Results 1 to 7 of 7
-
09-19-2008, 07:02 PM #1
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- Central PA, USA
- Age
- 68
- Posts
- 102
Red- 1995 Trans Am 6 Speed
Panhard Rod Adjustable vs. Non-Adjustable
Have a stock 1995 Trans Am with 105K miles. Its time to freshen up the suspension system. Considering upgrading the Panhard Rod to take advantage of the harder poly bushings. Have a question as to what advantages does an adjustable Panhard Rod have over non-adjustable. Plus what is the adjustablity buy in a stock configured F-Body?
If an adjustable is better, what is the criteria for ajusting it?
Considerng a suspension package from Hostchkins which only comes with an adjustable rod. Edelbrock makes a non-adjustable one that is on my list.
Will be making the upgrade in conjusting with replacing the lower trailing arms by Hostchkins. Also looking at replacing the front and rear sway bars with the larger Hotchkins sway bar (sold as a package.)
The rest of the TA is being kept stock with no power mods planned.
Comments please.
-
09-20-2008, 06:25 AM #2
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Location
- St. Clair Shores. Michigan
- Age
- 56
- Posts
- 1,602
Navy Blue Metallic- `98 Formula M6 HdTp
Give Sam Strano a call he's a Site Sponsor and is the Ultimate F-body Suspension guy.
I have his Springs Swabars and Koni 4/4's and I couldn't be happier.
As for your panhard bar question Adj. vs Non Adj.
All Factory F-bodies have the rearend biased to the driver side meaning it is not centered. Using an Adjustable Panhard bar you can shorten the length and move the rearend over towards the right. Same idea applies if you ever plan on lowering the car. I would suggest an on car adjustable one.Craig
Semi Retired Street Racer
2012 Lava Red Mustang GT Coupe Brembo/3.73's
Build Date 3/17/11, Last Lava Red GT
Gone but not forgoten
NBM `98 Formula M6 HdTp
1 of 1 Build Date 3/12/98
-
09-20-2008, 02:59 PM #3
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- Hamburg, Germany
- Posts
- 2,521
Silver- 1998 Camaro Z28 A4
i have the edelbrock non adjustable, works fine for me. definitely a gain compared to the stock one.
-
09-20-2008, 03:22 PM #4
I noticed no difference in ride with my adjustible rod ended phb. Get the adjustable one, no reason to change it otherwise imo.
-
09-20-2008, 11:06 PM #5
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- North Olmsted, OH
- Age
- 50
- Posts
- 506
Navy Blue Metallic- 2000 Camaro Z28
I agree unless you are lowering the car don't bother. When you do then get an adjustable.
-
09-21-2008, 02:22 AM #6
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- Beaver Dam KY
- Posts
- 7,745
79 T/A -91 Firebird- 1998 Trans Am -Oynx Black
Im considering on getting an aftermarket one just for the fact that the stockie hits my exhaust when the suspension is traveling. Probably getting a non adjustable
-
09-22-2008, 04:18 PM #7
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- Central PA, USA
- Age
- 68
- Posts
- 102
Red- 1995 Trans Am 6 Speed
Thanks folks. Will be call Mr. Strano this week to discuss. Will report back with my findings.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Question: Adjustable Panhard Bar
By 01WS6 in forum Suspension and HandlingReplies: 6Last Post: 12-18-2010, 04:48 AM -
Adjustable Panhard Bar
By 2001camaroSS in forum Suspension and HandlingReplies: 42Last Post: 12-14-2010, 07:49 PM -
Adjustable Panhard Rod Question!!!
By L3THAL_Z28 in forum Suspension and HandlingReplies: 21Last Post: 07-26-2007, 05:20 PM -
adjustable or non adjustable panhard?
By Z28LS1 in forum Suspension and HandlingReplies: 3Last Post: 03-12-2007, 02:07 PM -
WTB: Non-adjustable panhard bar
By Warbird in forum Parts Wanted / TradeReplies: 2Last Post: 09-23-2005, 10:15 AM
Bookmarks