Results 1 to 16 of 16
Thread: LT's + ORY + Flowmaster
-
03-07-2008, 10:29 AM #1
-
03-09-2008, 08:37 AM #2Party Time, Excellent...
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Bay Area, California
- Posts
- 256
Arctic White- 2000 Z-28
Sounds pretty good
-
03-09-2008, 10:06 AM #3
How old are the parts?? If there brand new, i wouldnt worry about it much because its prolly all the crap getting burned off. Was it cold outside? How old is ur oil and are u low/leaking it? Was the car cold when u did this or was the engine at operating temp?
-
03-09-2008, 02:09 PM #4
Parts are broken in 1000+ miles, engine was not cold, it was like 55 degrees out, car has never consumed oil in the past, but the battery was dead before i started it, so the learning curves in the computer were lost, but i'm still worried about it
-
03-14-2008, 11:44 AM #5
sounds good i wouldn't crank on it like that though at idle. i've always been told don't turn it over 2,000 rpm's unless it's under a load. especially at cold start up.
-
03-16-2008, 12:20 PM #6
well it wasnt a cold startup, it was at operating temp, and i cant see that hurting the engine since under a load it has more stress on it... idk
-
03-16-2008, 05:34 PM #7
-
03-16-2008, 06:10 PM #8
free revving a motor is like running down a hill. It is easier to do but it flings parts more quickly making for unstable harmonics and valve train instability. It may not hurt your engine right then and now but its simply not a good idea.
on the other hand running up a hill is more strainful but is more controlled, hope this analogy helps.
Ok OK every now and then i rev it to, just try not to do it to high.2000 auto camaro
13.54 @ 104 2.049 60' stock 2.73
12.94 @ 109 2.002 60' full exhaust, lid, tune, nitto 555r 2.73
11.899 @ 114.44 1.686 60' full exhaust, lid, tune, nitto 245/50-16 555r 3.73 moser 12-bolt 2800 fuddle, ls6 intake manifold, slp under drive pully,fiberglass hood, bmr k-member
-
03-16-2008, 06:25 PM #9
^^^ i agree, you're right, i think i only revved to about 5k, so not totally fuckin it over
-
03-16-2008, 08:02 PM #10
-
03-25-2008, 11:27 AM #11
-
03-25-2008, 03:25 PM #12
Not sure if I'm running lean, but I am planning to get a tune, and I'm a believer that a Flowmaster muffler is not "counter productive" rather people dont know what they're talking about and assume a muffler company who has been around many more years than others, would design a muffler that doesn't flow better than a stocker.....
-
03-25-2008, 03:26 PM #13
-
03-25-2008, 03:40 PM #14
i ran [email protected]
-
03-25-2008, 04:01 PM #15
not too shabby, good trap speed thats for sure
-
03-30-2008, 03:31 AM #16What's the matter?
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- Columbus Ohio
- Age
- 48
- Posts
- 254
Silver- At least its paid for.
I like the sound of the flowmaster cat backs. Too bad they don't flow very well. Yours sounds good with the Lt's and flowmaster.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
For Sale: flowmaster
By jodmari in forum Parts For Sale / TradeReplies: 0Last Post: 01-18-2016, 05:43 PM -
how bad really is flowmaster???
By Raoul-Duke in forum External EngineReplies: 10Last Post: 06-09-2008, 08:29 PM -
k&n and flowmaster, now what?
By johnnydjersey in forum General HelpReplies: 12Last Post: 09-20-2007, 10:30 PM -
F/S flowmaster
By tahoebigah in forum Parts For Sale / TradeReplies: 6Last Post: 09-05-2007, 01:06 PM -
Is Flowmaster All That Bad?
By blackls1ta in forum External EngineReplies: 26Last Post: 06-23-2007, 06:30 AM




Reply With Quote
You finally open her up with LT's and then throw the cork back in her mouth with the blowmasters.


Bookmarks