View Poll Results: turbo or super?
- Voters
- 876. You may not vote on this poll
-
I prefer a supercharger to turbos.......
389 44.41% -
I prefer turbos to superchargers........
487 55.59%
Results 61 to 80 of 464
Thread: Turbo or Supercharger poll
-
04-30-2006, 03:21 PM #61
- Join Date
- Sep 2005
- Location
- NJ
- Posts
- 757
Originally Posted by ericwilloughby
I just didnt see the point in measuring backpressure. In theory, a turbocharger is usually considered more efficient because it is using the wasted energy in the exhaust stream as a source of power. I always thought just using exhaust isnt actually draining power from the motor, but the supercharger clearly is.
-
04-30-2006, 10:08 PM #62
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Location
- murillo, ontario, canada
- Posts
- 63
silver- 2002 TA WS6 A4-Vert
Originally Posted by WinSomeLoseNone
-
05-01-2006, 07:19 AM #63Originally Posted by EE1983
Of course a turbo is more efficient. But not free. And much less efficient in the rear. The question was:
Does anyone know? at 3,000 and 6,000 RPM:
How much HP is wasted driving a SC and
How much HP is lost due to back pressure and the inability to use exhaust mods on a turbo?
-
05-01-2006, 09:44 AM #64Originally Posted by ericwilloughby
Turbo can benefit from Cams and certainly open exhaust. Turbos HATE restrictive exhaust systems so cut outs make a huge difference
-
05-01-2006, 09:52 AM #65Originally Posted by ericwilloughby
Turbo can benefit from Cams and certainly open exhaust. Turbos HATE restrictive exhaust systems so cut outs make a huge difference
-
05-01-2006, 10:47 AM #66
[QUOTE=ericwilloughby]Of course a turbo is more efficient. But not free. And much less efficient in the rear. The question was:
Originally Posted by ericwilloughby
Originally Posted by ericwilloughby
As an Example: Starting with a 300hp engine on a dyno (assume the N/A car makes 300 to the tires)
N/A = 300 (this is our base)
Roots blower at 15psi = 480 to 500
Centrifugal blower at 15psi = 520 to 545
Centrifugal with intercooler at 15psi = 565 to 585
Turbo intercooled at 15psi =585 to 600 but with about 100 to 140 ft/lbs more torque then the centrifugal
-
05-01-2006, 11:53 AM #67
Good numbers. If they are close then I was right. The "extra back pressure" caused by the turbo costs perhaps 40hp ay WOT.
If :
Turbo intercooled at 15psi =585 to 600
Centrifugal with intercooler at 15psi = 565 to 585
Then the turbo reduces output by almost as much as the blower because it only makes 15-20 more HP then the centifugal. If the blower is robbing 80 than the turbo is robing 50-60.
-
05-01-2006, 11:55 AM #68
The other post is not wrong.
You can't use cut outs on a rear mount turbo.
Headers are "almost" useless. Same with cam.
Unless you have some dyno experience that says otherwise. I'd like to know.
-
05-02-2006, 06:35 AM #69Originally Posted by ericwilloughby
-
05-02-2006, 12:55 PM #70
Of course there is extra back pressure. The scroll squeezes the exhaust down to about 1.6 inches or so. And you verified the amount of loss when you theorized the #'s for turbo vs. SC and there was not a 80 HP differance between the two.
-
05-02-2006, 02:38 PM #71Originally Posted by ericwilloughby
I then checked the back pressure in a 05 Mustang with a 12psi turbo and all 3inch single exhaust. At 6500 and 12psi it only has 18 psi in the exhaust. I then took the discharge tube of the intercooler and made a pass. Granted the car ran like Crap but it only has 4psi back pressure through the turbo exhaust but without the benefit of the turbo pressurizing the intake
What is the point? The turbo makes no more back pressure in the exhaust then the next system
-
05-02-2006, 04:04 PM #72
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Location
- south chicago burbs
- Posts
- 33
- 04 srt4 and 99 firebird
I dunno if someone has said this but it takes about 5hp from the engine to make a turbo give it an additional 100hp. It takes about 30hp from the engine to give it 100hp.
Sorry I admit I am biased and I think a turbo is better in almost everyway. I just hate the hillbilly thought of just strap the thing to the engine.
-
05-03-2006, 02:44 PM #73Originally Posted by Granatelli
What are you taking about? You are making the numbers that prove I am right but you refuse to see it. I am very impressed that you actually took the time and work to measure the back pressure.
18psi is significant. I didn't know it would be that high.
Of course the turbo creates extra back pressure. It's a restriction in the exhaust that drives a compressor. WTF.
The SC does not impose back pressure on the exhaust. You arn't measuring back pressure caused by the driving of the SC. You are measuring the exhaust pressure created by making more HP. The running of more fuel and air into and out of the engine.
-
05-03-2006, 09:22 PM #74
-
05-04-2006, 10:07 AM #75
are headers and hiflow cats useless to a turno setup? i was always planning a blower so i'm new to the turbo thang... but i have headers and hiflows awaiting install... if i sell them off i'll be that much closer to turbo if i go that route and wont gain anything... i'll be saving nearly a grand in installation if i can manage to run without them...
-
05-05-2006, 12:45 PM #76
I'm runnin a Procharger and I still say TURBO!
2001 Onyx Black SS
ATI D1-SC Procharger
Mcleod Twin DIsc Clutch
QA-1's all around
BMR LCA's,SFC's,TA,PHR
-
05-06-2006, 05:31 AM #77
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- Melbourne, Australia
- Posts
- 10
EF1 Dynamics Tuned- VX CALAIS LS1
I voted turbo but wouldn't knock back a cheap s/charger kit
-
05-08-2006, 12:28 PM #78Snake EaterGuest
turbo
-
05-08-2006, 03:39 PM #79Originally Posted by grandkodiak
Do any of the factory turbo cars have headers on them??????
I have asked before. Will an SC engine with headers and exhaust and maybe a cam make the same power as the same engine with a turbo?? Same boost and intercooler of course?
Granatelli, do you know?
-
05-08-2006, 04:20 PM #80Snake EaterGuest
yes.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
supercharger or turbo
By pipes_ta in forum Forced InductionReplies: 22Last Post: 11-17-2009, 01:34 PM -
Question: turbo vs supercharger
By SSMOKEshow in forum Forced InductionReplies: 29Last Post: 02-17-2008, 07:59 AM -
Supercharger or Turbo? What do you have/like
By fastfirebird2002 in forum Forced InductionReplies: 7Last Post: 01-27-2008, 10:58 PM -
who says you can't turbo a supercharger?
By third_shift|studios in forum Almost Anything GoesReplies: 33Last Post: 12-05-2007, 09:02 AM -
A4- supercharger or turbo?
By socialdbob in forum Forced InductionReplies: 28Last Post: 12-21-2006, 06:31 PM
Bookmarks