Results 1 to 20 of 30
-
04-13-2016, 06:20 AM #1
Now We Know The 2016 SS Is Capable Of An Honest 171 MPH
This ticket is gonna hurt...
Speeder Caught Going 171 MPH
-
04-13-2016, 06:24 AM #2
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Location
- Florida Man Status Acheivement
- Posts
- 11,808
Navy Blue Metallic- 98 T/A, 00 FBVert, 78T/A
I saw that yesterday.....
Your move Ford & Dodge....
-
04-13-2016, 08:13 AM #3
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Location
- San Diego, CA
- Posts
- 5,822
2002 Z28 A4 NBM- Sadly now demodded :(
I'm surprised the radar didn't automatically register WTF?!?!?
67 Camaro: K-K + 797-z (look it up), 454/Th400/4.10 12-bolt = 6mpg, PS/PDB/PW tilt, tach, gauges...
2005 Corvette LS2/M6 Magnetic Red Metallic (What else would it be?) w/ Cashmere interior
2002 Z28: NBM/Tan, MTI smooth lid, smooth bellows, !AIR, !cats, 1-3/4" QTP SS LT's, 2-1/2" TD's with X-pipe, MagnaFlows dumped at axle, custom welded SFC's, MidWest Chassis body mount adjustable T/A, 3400 stall, 3.23 gears (was 2.73). Tuned: 343rwhp/357rwt (before TD's). Best: 12.559 @ 108+, 1.73 60' @ 3500' DA w/MT ET Street DR's.
Carbon footprint? CLOWN SHOE!
-
04-13-2016, 08:38 AM #4
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Location
- Florida Man Status Acheivement
- Posts
- 11,808
Navy Blue Metallic- 98 T/A, 00 FBVert, 78T/A
I'm surprised the guy slowed down......
-
04-13-2016, 04:12 PM #5
That's all? Pfft.
Sent from my SM-G900V using TapatalkBoost gets you laid, unless your name is Jon.
-
04-13-2016, 07:05 PM #6
Huh?
The SS is a better car in most aspects than the charger, but it can't beat an SRT8 in the quarter mile or top speed. We won't even bother to compare the SS to a charger hellcat. Ford doesn't seem to care beyond the Taurus SHO, which will run with an SS with a quick tune.this post is meant as a joke and in no way should it be interpreted as a serious or meaningful reply. The author of this post cannot be held liable for any damages, both emotional and physical, that may be incurred from the reading of this post. By acknowledging this disclaimer you hereby release the author from any and all liability
-
04-14-2016, 06:09 AM #7
- Join Date
- Sep 2010
- Location
- Bel Air, Maryland
- Posts
- 1,750
Silver- '02 Trans Am WS-6, 6M
Are you trying to say that the Taurus SHO will gain more than 100 hp/tq with a quick tune? I know the SHOs are fairly quick and the AWD helps but its also a hefty-er car, even with a "quick-tune", Id imagine the SHO would start falling off by the 1/8th mile vs a Camaro SS, especially the automatic one.
SLP Air Lid/Smooth Bellows
L76 6.0L block, PRC Ported 243 heads, Texas Speed 224R cam.
Kooks Emissions LT Headers/Catted Y pipe
Elite Engineering PCV Oil Catch Can
SLP Smooth Air Lid and Smooth Belows
NGK TR55 plugs
Magnaflow Cat-back
Spohn Front Upper Tubular Control Arms
UMI Front Lower Tubular Control Arms
UMI Front Sway Bar
UMI Rear Lower Control Arms/ Adjustable Panhard Rod
UMI Welded-on Two Piece Subframe Connectors
Factory C5 Z06 17x9.5 wheels w/ 285-40-17 Continental Extreme Contact Sports all the way around.
Dyno Dynamics dynoed @ 415 rwhp
Weight reduction via removal of dead mice
-
04-14-2016, 08:43 AM #8
-
04-14-2016, 08:47 AM #9
It is VERY easy for a twin turbo V6 to pick up 100/100 with a quick tune.
365HP stock.
Intake/exhaust/tune = 550HP and 600+tq.Demanding something free on top of a discount is just being a Democrat
-
04-14-2016, 12:58 PM #10
I didn't read the article. I thought he was referring to the Chevy SS sedan. But yeah, the 2016 Camaro SS shits all over a mustang GT. The GM products will out-handle their counterparts, but dodge doesn't seem to care. They're still selling all the hellcats they can build
-
04-14-2016, 07:02 PM #11
-
04-14-2016, 09:19 PM #12
It's retarded to compare modified cars to factory stock cars. A new camaro is an infinitely better car than a fourth gen in every conceivable way.
-
04-16-2016, 03:01 AM #13
-
04-16-2016, 03:05 AM #14
-
04-16-2016, 03:33 AM #15
-
04-16-2016, 10:53 AM #16
That's all you got? Lol. I don't need to own one to know that it's absolutely retarded to compare old modified cars to new ones. How about we bust out the old mustang fox body argument just to drive home how stupid it is. And yeah, sixth gens are hard to see out of... If you're a midget that always drives in reverse.
What color is your sixth gen by the way? I've owned several fourth gen f bodies, and spent a week in a sixth gen rental. The fourth gen is a gigantic pile of shit compared to the new ones. But that shouldn't be surprising to anyone with a brain. The sixth gen is far newer in terms of technology and engineering, and we can't forget the the f bodies were crap when they were new. Good engine, yeah, and nice looking, but otherwise crap. There's a reason f bodies didn't sell well.Last edited by 5.0THIS; 04-16-2016 at 11:19 AM.
-
04-16-2016, 11:43 AM #17
- Join Date
- Nov 2009
- Location
- bernaillio county
- Posts
- 292
navy blue- 2002 camaro ss
The 2016 camaro ss is a rocketship!!!! The automatic is a hair quicker than the manual, The auto runs consistent 12.30s at 116 mph!!! Thats right there with the srt8!!!
-
04-16-2016, 02:13 PM #18
-
04-16-2016, 02:34 PM #19
-
04-16-2016, 05:18 PM #20
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
US Intel Shows That Iran Is Now Capable of Building a Nuke
By theorangeguy in forum Political / Debate ForumReplies: 8Last Post: 01-31-2014, 08:22 AM -
Well, At Least She's Honest...
By DJ Red Barron in forum Almost Anything GoesReplies: 6Last Post: 10-12-2010, 09:12 PM -
How honest is LS1.com???
By blackSS01 in forum Almost Anything GoesReplies: 47Last Post: 09-02-2009, 10:26 AM -
Is this cam capable of these numbers!!!
By NeeD4SpeeD in forum Internal EngineReplies: 14Last Post: 08-23-2006, 11:55 AM -
Iran buys surface-to-surface missiles capable of hitting Europe
By zleeper z in forum Political / Debate ForumReplies: 14Last Post: 04-30-2006, 07:49 PM
Bookmarks