Results 21 to 40 of 42
Thread: Tell me why
-
04-07-2010, 05:11 PM #21
I've got a stock suspension except for Hotchkis swaybars,275's front 295's rear and it corners like its on rails.
Last edited by 383ls6; 04-07-2010 at 05:55 PM.
-
04-07-2010, 05:15 PM #22Four Seat Vette
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Location
- pasadena md
- Posts
- 2,034
- Blog Entries
- 2
Black- 2002 SS Camaro
see im not the only one lol^^^
-
04-07-2010, 07:42 PM #23
I thought my 97 TA handled well, they she got modded and it was even better... that was compared to a 95 Vette. My SS is as stiff as a 12 year old Omish Boy in Hooters!
Hard Top, G2 LCA's, UMI TA, 1LE rear springs, Bilstiens, Eibach Sport Line front springs, UMI 3pt SFC, UMI PHR. I've been driveing the last 2 days with no rear sway, soon to have a Spohn 1" Sway on my 9" and DA LCA's.
IMHO, tires make a huge differnce, BFG's compared to say a Renken... BFG's win, twice the cost, twice the fun factor, F1's are great but spendy.
-
04-07-2010, 07:48 PM #24Four Seat Vette
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Location
- pasadena md
- Posts
- 2,034
- Blog Entries
- 2
Black- 2002 SS Camaro
i use nexen tires and they do extremely well
-
04-08-2010, 05:24 AM #25
-
04-08-2010, 05:40 AM #26Junior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Location
- ohio
- Age
- 35
- Posts
- 85
pewter- 2000 ss slp
i just go fast in a strait line soo i dnt have anything to say about handling lol
-
04-08-2010, 09:00 AM #27Senior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Location
- Milwaukee
- Posts
- 3,276
Arctic White, red/gray- 1997 Corvette, 92 Typhoon
They handle decent, but I didnt like mine on stock suspension. Although when i bought the car my main DD was a supra with eibach coilovers. After i changed the suspension around on the T/A it was alot better. I agree get rid of stock suspension and you will know what you were missing.
-
04-08-2010, 02:05 PM #28Four Seat Vette
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Location
- pasadena md
- Posts
- 2,034
- Blog Entries
- 2
Black- 2002 SS Camaro
-
04-08-2010, 02:23 PM #29
love my bridgestone potenza re050a's. not so good on the snow i recently found out lol
-
04-08-2010, 02:26 PM #30Four Seat Vette
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Location
- pasadena md
- Posts
- 2,034
- Blog Entries
- 2
Black- 2002 SS Camaro
hahaha i found that out too
-
04-08-2010, 06:10 PM #31
-
04-10-2010, 01:23 PM #32Junior Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Location
- Oklahoma
- Age
- 37
- Posts
- 13
Black- 1998 Chevrolet Camaro Z28
Yeah man i dont understand either. I have a 98 Z28 with 96k miles on it and just replaced basically everything suspension wise with aftermarket stuff. Stock I dont think Camaros handle GREAT but they arent that bad. But I have bilsteins, eibach springs, torque arm, strut tower brace, front sway bar, sub frame connectors, parnhard rod, and lower control arms. While it does reduce the ride quality and is bouncy as hell its still a BLAST to drive. It handles like its on rails. I plan to do a road race soon in Oklahoma City in May so I will see if it passes the test haha.
-
04-10-2010, 06:11 PM #33
-
04-10-2010, 08:51 PM #34

2018 Tahoe - Silver - OEM
2008 Z06 - Velocity Yellow - BBE exhuast - Airaid CAI **sold**
2002 Z06 - Electron Blue Metallic - D1 - E85 - 701 rwhp 687 rwtq **sold**
2002 Z28: M6 NBM - cam and boltons - 396rwhp 357 rwtq **sold**
-
04-10-2010, 08:57 PM #35
I thought the suspension handled pretty good for stock but kindof jittery. I added Strano springs, Koni adjustable shocks, and umi adjustable panhard bar. I also gave my alignment guy Sam Stranos alignment specs. The car rides a little rougher but it feels very stable ( not jittery ) and handles 10 times better.
-
04-10-2010, 09:07 PM #36
-
04-10-2010, 09:36 PM #37
-
04-10-2010, 10:29 PM #38
-
04-11-2010, 12:54 AM #39
-
04-11-2010, 02:08 AM #40Senior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2009
- Location
- NOVA
- Posts
- 1,266
2002 C5 - M6 - Blue- 2000 Z28 - A4 - Pewter

Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)



Reply With Quote
fbody+snow=fail 100% of the time


We still love you MC!!

Bookmarks