Page 5 of 9 FirstFirst 123456789 LastLast
Results 81 to 100 of 180
  1. #81
    Impounded
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    park bench
    Posts
    1,399
    gmcheviac

    Yeah, I hate it. And the whole bloated ass huge thick car with a short roof thing. The vert looks way better with the roof down. DOn't particularly like it either. I don't like the driving position or interior of 4th gens either. My dad doesn't understand why I hate driving the Formula. No height adjustment and I have a really short torso for 6'. Also, the previous owner wore out the bottom and bolsters with his fat ass. Power adjustables coming soon...

  2. #82
    Member CJREX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    GA
    Posts
    701
    Gone:2001 Camaro SS #4846

    The new 5.0 redlines at 7000 rpm.

    I can't wait to hear one. Love my LS1 but I confess that the Ford V8s sound better.

    Couple that with a manual trans and it will be as good as sex.

    Ford Article

  3. #83
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Detroit
    Age
    43
    Posts
    1,664

    Black/Red/Black/Red
    98WS6/06MCSS/86GN/06H3

    Quote Originally Posted by CJREX View Post
    The new 5.0 redlines at 7000 rpm.

    I can't wait to hear one. Love my LS1 but I confess that the Ford V8s sound better.

    Couple that with a manual trans and it will be as good as sex.

    Ford Article
    +1 man that is realtalk

  4. #84
    Impounded
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    park bench
    Posts
    1,399
    gmcheviac

    And the fuel mileage is up from 23 to 25 mpg... Good shit

  5. #85
    Senior Member snaggeltooth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    alabama
    Posts
    7,203

    Gray
    2012 Challenger R/T

    Quote Originally Posted by wheeliE-maxx View Post
    And the fuel mileage is up from 23 to 25 mpg... Good shit
    get a new 6 speed

  6. #86
    Impounded
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    park bench
    Posts
    1,399
    gmcheviac

    That makes sense. Still very badass

  7. #87
    Member F-my-body's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Midlothian Virginia
    Posts
    271

    Black
    2002 Z28

    so a 2011 V6 mustang will almost be able to beat a 2010 GT? since theres only a 10HP difference...aaannd will a 02 Z28 be able to beat a 2010 GT with ease?

  8. #88
    Impounded
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    park bench
    Posts
    1,399
    gmcheviac

    The 4.6 still has a good bit more torque than a v6 which is important in a heavy ass car, so no. And your car should bitch slap a '10 gt with ease bone stock

  9. #89
    Member CJREX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    GA
    Posts
    701
    Gone:2001 Camaro SS #4846

    Not so sure about bitch slapping a 2010 with ease.

    Motor Trend got one to a 13.5 @ 105 in the 1/4, and they are not the quickest drivers.

    A 2010 GT would probably be very close to a drivers race with a stock LS1.

  10. #90
    Impounded
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    park bench
    Posts
    1,399
    gmcheviac

    Bitch slapping doesn't have an exact definition but.. Anyways 315 horsepower and 325 lb/ft in a heavier car doesn't even sound close in real life

  11. #91
    Team Skeet Captain JHayesLS1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Winter Garden, FL
    Age
    37
    Posts
    2,061

    Black
    1999 Camaro Z28

    I hope I can find me a 2011 GT when they come out thats not 20G over sticker.

  12. #92
    Impounded
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    park bench
    Posts
    1,399
    gmcheviac

    i'm sure they will play the shit out of the 5.0 moniker... Or Boss 302, some shit like that

  13. #93
    Member CJREX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    GA
    Posts
    701
    Gone:2001 Camaro SS #4846

    Quote Originally Posted by wheeliE-maxx View Post
    Bitch slapping doesn't have an exact definition but.. Anyways 315 horsepower and 325 lb/ft in a heavier car doesn't even sound close in real life
    Yes, but remember that Motor Trend only got a 13.5 when they tested a WS6 T/A, exact same as the 2010 GT.

    It took the GT 10 years to reach parity, but give credit where it is due.

    It closely matches stock LS1 performance with a liter smaller engine.

    And you can bet that "The Return Of The 5.0" will be heralded in the commercials. Too much nostalgia in that 5.0 badge.

  14. #94
    Senior Member big hammer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    manitoba, canada
    Posts
    1,731

    silver
    2002 ws6

    Quote Originally Posted by wheeliE-maxx View Post
    i'm sure they will play the shit out of the 5.0 moniker... Or Boss 302, some shit like that
    a boss 302 would be the shit!

  15. #95
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    florida
    Age
    49
    Posts
    156
    http://media.ford.com/images/10031/2...g_GT_Specs.pdf

    Almost 4000 pounds also.Man they need to offer a stripped model.

  16. #96
    Impounded
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    park bench
    Posts
    1,399
    gmcheviac

    Quote Originally Posted by CJREX View Post
    Yes, but remember that Motor Trend only got a 13.5 when they tested a WS6 T/A, exact same as the 2010 GT.

    It took the GT 10 years to reach parity, but give credit where it is due.

    It closely matches stock LS1 performance with a liter smaller engine.

    And you can bet that "The Return Of The 5.0" will be heralded in the commercials. Too much nostalgia in that 5.0 badge.
    I think 346 cubes is closer to a 5.6 really (may be wrong) so it has six tenths of a liter on the five oh. And It's all apples to oranges. dohc, 4 valves etc. And Ford chose that displacement. Gm chose a larger displacement, who's problem is that. No Ford bashing here though, GT>5th gen by miles.

  17. #97
    Member CJREX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    GA
    Posts
    701
    Gone:2001 Camaro SS #4846

    We were comparing the 2010 GT which is still 4.6 liters.

    The new 5.0 is in a different league.

  18. #98
    Impounded
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    park bench
    Posts
    1,399
    gmcheviac

    Oh well, still Ford's problem (or maybe not, Mustangs actually sell) for making the small motor

  19. #99
    Senior Member snaggeltooth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    alabama
    Posts
    7,203

    Gray
    2012 Challenger R/T

    Quote Originally Posted by wheeliE-maxx View Post
    Oh well, still Ford's problem (or maybe not, Mustangs actually sell) for making the small motor
    if the 5.0 is the same block as the 6.2 , which I think it is .. it can be bored and stroked to 427CU.. .so look out ..

  20. #100
    Impounded
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    park bench
    Posts
    1,399
    gmcheviac

    I don't have a stake in any of that, but.. How long have sbc's and lsx's been in the 400+ cube range?

Page 5 of 9 FirstFirst 123456789 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 4 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 4 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. 2012 Ford Mustang Boss 302 - The Boss Is Back
    By Ed Blown Vert in forum Almost Anything Goes
    Replies: 102
    Last Post: 08-19-2010, 06:12 PM
  2. Ford strikes back.
    By 02transamce in forum Almost Anything Goes
    Replies: 180
    Last Post: 03-04-2010, 11:52 AM
  3. Question: What is the offical name of the WS6 hood?
    By supersporter13 in forum Appearance Section
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 08-12-2008, 09:17 PM
  4. Thats it I gave up. and it is offical!
    By Knighthawk LS1 in forum Rocky Mountain Members
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 09-28-2006, 04:22 PM
  5. It's offical the challenger is back!!!!!!!!
    By Murder after Midnight in forum Almost Anything Goes
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 07-05-2006, 03:28 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •