Maybe Daniel Craig should look in to being one of the main guys in a Nicholas Sparks movie if he wants to feel more creative and have more meaning...
Printable View
I look at it like this, if you want long and deep character development go into tv, you have to damn near make a perfect movie to get it in a 2-3 hr movie and even then you still will not likely get that.
That was one weird movie.
He made that between Bond films.
Do you watch "The Blacklist"? James Spader does an awesome job in it.
I stick to FX and HBO shows these days...watch a few others but mainly those two channels when it comes to a series.
He still has his private island in the Bahamas that cost him $7million. He got rid of a large portion of his Ferrari collection to get out of the debt his financial advisor got him in to. The guy who should be burned at the stake is the guy who was supposed to be managing his money and was instead burning through it and stealing from him.
wasn't he the same adviser that got W. Snipes in trouble too.
It's my opinion. I'm not trying to promote anything in my favor. Despite some actors doing it better than others, Bond has always had a fairly constant personality, and the movies a certain tone. The new "darker" Bond figure is an instance (to me) where producers ran out of ideas and had to put their own original take on a classic character. :shrug:
Nope...it was because of the Austin Powers movies. They made them so "funny" and "comical" that the writers thought "there's no way they could pull it off like that" so they went with the direction they went. Heard it on an interview with Daniel Craig.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tXKQ6XAaHiU