Results 41 to 53 of 53
Thread: Si wants some
-
02-14-2008, 06:10 PM #41
-
02-14-2008, 06:45 PM #42
Sweet, well maybe this bitch of a race will go down on sunday
-
02-15-2008, 02:13 PM #43
-
02-15-2008, 02:22 PM #44
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- Syracuse, NY
- Age
- 40
- Posts
- 61
Black- 1994 Z28 SOLD 2000 GT
There have been very few Cobalt SSs in the 13s but it is possible. I would look to run a SI before considering one of those.
With a pulley swap they are going to walk you.
-
02-15-2008, 02:44 PM #45
Yea but omg they gain soo much from it, im not really sure if the V8s gain that much from A/C removal but I am sure it helps. I remember when my friend first got an older CRX Si, first thing he did was remove the A/C and his car responded a lot. Very noticeable. That was back when I had the V6 camaro, I would use to beat him by like 2 bus-lengths, and after the a/c removal I can only beat him by a few car lengths. So yea its a great "mod" for the CRXs
-
02-15-2008, 02:51 PM #46
Thats a factor of motor size.
The engine is so small, that turning the AC compressor takes a large portion of the engine's total output. However, with the A/C off, the clutch should be freewheeling, which create almost no drag at all. So maybe his A/C clutch was seized up or something.
-
02-16-2008, 02:39 PM #47
this is the 06 model so i dont know if there is a deffrence but this is wut i found
[/QUOTE]
The normally aspirated, 2.0-liter mill makes 197 horsepower at 7800 rpm and 139 lb.ft. of torque at 6100 rpm. A high revver, you say? That’s for sure. This 16-valve, dual overhead cam, normally aspirated, Multi-Point fuel injected engine is CARB certified as LEV2 (Low Emissions Vehicle). Honda’s iVTEC™ valve control system uses cams with 2 profiles to maximize low end and high end efficiency. Compression ratio is 11:1. Of course, with that high compression premium fuel is recommended. With modest torque the low-end grunt is less than impressive, but get her over 4500 and feel the fun. There’s something exciting and race-car-like about driving at higher revs all the time.
The Civic Si weighs less than 3,000 pounds and EPA estimates are 23 mpg in the city and 32 highway. The fuel tank holds 13.2 gallons and I only got about 300 miles on the first tank of fuel before the warning light came on. I’m guessing I was at the lower end of the mileage scale since I was running her hard. I believe, in my heart of hearts, that the Civic Si will be great fun even driving gently and I’m going to try very hard in the next couple of days to check that out. It ain’t easy though.[/QUOTE]
full reveiw at http://www.theautochannel.com/news/2...14/011248.html
hope thatwill help.
-
02-16-2008, 06:55 PM #48
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- pocola oklahoma
- Age
- 53
- Posts
- 1,121
black- 2002 firehawk 94 Z28
3 pages of reading this post im ready to line up with this dude. GITTER DUN and film it to plz.
Last edited by t-rock; 02-17-2008 at 09:49 AM.
-
02-16-2008, 08:10 PM #49
a fully gutted civic. with headers back and a CAI i think it would be a great race.
-
02-17-2008, 06:02 AM #50
civic has no chance
-
02-17-2008, 09:51 AM #51
-
02-17-2008, 10:18 AM #52
DAMN, suppose to meet up to race again today, but guess what? Another rainy day...
-
02-17-2008, 11:32 AM #53
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks