v6 Mustang with decals and exhaust so it must have been fast!

**TrickStang37** · 11-25-2007, 10:23 PM

Originally Posted by TransAm11973

no i am just pissy cuz all the mustang guys here always gotta come up to me while i mind my own business and they act all like " i got the best car in the world" reving and being jackasses. then i blow doors off. .......you know that feeling in the summer when you aer trying to eat and those damn little flys keep pissing you off and flying around your head. thats all i am trying to say. Like I said its not just the speed of the car, if you can honestly tell me mustangs now adays are made better than a taurus ever was then i am crazy. cheap cheap cheap. i like the retro styling of the newest mustangs, but to get anything worthy out of that car you gotta but the super duper waste your money package....and even then its a 07 ford. ford= take every little shortcut to save money. my fathers company supplies them with fords and has for years, and every year they fall apart.

Dude, you need to get laid. Chill out. You're all over the place.

**Redegal** · 11-25-2007, 10:26 PM

Originally Posted by basballny2

......stock for stock a trans am will take a grand national

I challenge you to find a stock GN.

**TrickStang37** · 11-25-2007, 10:30 PM

i think my neighbors is stock, not sure. I've always wanted one.

**basballny2** · 11-25-2007, 11:16 PM

Originally Posted by Redegal

I challenge you to find a stock GN.

all im saying is stock for stock a fbody will run about a second faster

**TransAm11973** · 11-26-2007, 03:37 AM

TRICKSTANG,

Suck a fat one and get rid of your piece of shit ford. Go to do a different site as well. One that doesnt say LS1, as in NOT FORD, on it. And not really all over the place as you say, just in front of your POS ford......thats all.

**TransAm11973** · 11-26-2007, 03:40 AM

I would have to be some sort of IDIOT to want to go on a ford mustang website when I drive an LS1. Seriously. Why is it that its the other way around. Enough of this we respect all cars on this site............waaa waaa waaa only a wus stang owner would come on a GM LS1 site, makes no sense

**Redegal** · 11-26-2007, 06:10 AM

Originally Posted by TrickStang37

i think my neighbors is stock, not sure. I've always wanted one.

I bet if you talked to him you would find out he's got at least some goodies other the hood.

Stock for stock the GN ran a 13.9 @99 compared to the mid to low 13 sec capability of the LS1.

**mnypitZ** · 11-26-2007, 06:36 AM

Originally Posted by CHRRRIS

*cough* Supra */cough*

Supra is not a V6, its an I6.

Also, check this out, Justin Starkey's V6 Mustang. Dont get me wrong, I cant stand Mustangs, but damn.

Justin's TT 00 Mustang V6 runs 10.9@127 with a totally stock 3.8L engine making 450RWHP at 17psi:
Video: http://www.v6power.net/images/justin/v2/109.wmv
Timeslip: http://www.v6power.net/images/justin/v2/109slip.jpg
Pics and Info: http://v6power.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=36444

**blue02Z** · 11-26-2007, 06:39 AM

Originally Posted by TransAm11973

TRICKSTANG,

Suck a fat one and get rid of your piece of shit ford. Go to do a different site as well. One that doesnt say LS1, as in NOT FORD, on it. And not really all over the place as you say, just in front of your POS ford......thats all.

dude! get a clue, its a free world and they can come on here, there are so many people on here that drive fords or any other car for that matter. you are the reason people think f-body owners are dicks, these terminators on here you are referring to would waste your ass in a race. it takes around a full bolt on ls1 to hang next to a stock 03-04 cobra. i have yet to see a stock termy...

also, you compare the build quality of 05+ mustang and it is loads better than that of our f-bodys. our cars are built out of cheap plastic with minimal options. and BTW an 05+ mustang gt is a drivers race for an ls1. stock for stock

**blue02Z** · 11-26-2007, 06:49 AM

.....

**mnypitZ** · 11-26-2007, 06:53 AM

I think what a lot of people are missing is era to era comparisons. The Grand National, or even the 89 pace car Trans Am with the GN engine were built in the 80s. When most f-bodies couldnt pull off 200rwhp, and be lucky to get into the low 15s with an average driver. Secondly you are comparing a 1998 LS1 to a new Mustang with a supercharger. Just imagine if GM had continued developing the f-body into the current LSx engines, without a supercharger. Yeah there is the cubic inches argument, but lets face it, Ford could have upped the CI instead of throwing a S/C on there.

Now compare the 80s fox bodies to the 80s f-bodies.

OK I hate Mustangs with a passion, but I think this is a fair analysis. To the general public, non enthusiasts, the argument goes Z28 to Mustang GT. You know the magazine article warriors.

Dont get me wrong, I am not bashing Mustangs, but lets try to compare apples to apples. There are some pretty fast Mustangs out there.

**rajiv1998** · 11-26-2007, 10:30 AM

This is getting good

**hutch1999** · 11-26-2007, 12:14 PM

Originally Posted by TransAm11973

I would have to be some sort of IDIOT to want to go on a ford mustang website when I drive an LS1.

I guess im one of those IDIOTS, lol. Hey the only reason I go to other sites is to find info on my enemies and to spread the gospel of the Ls1.

**blk_jaws** · 11-26-2007, 01:23 PM

Hey, I'll always own a Trans Am but I wouldnt care one bit to have a Mach 1 or a terminator cobra sittin in the garage right beside it, and i would say a lot of guys on here would agree.

**rajiv1998** · 11-26-2007, 01:30 PM

Originally Posted by goose_von

Hey, I'll always own a Trans Am but I wouldnt care one bit to have a Mach 1 or a terminator cobra sittin in the garage right beside it, and i would say a lot of guys on here would agree.

i was gonna sell my car for a termi

**basballny2** · 11-26-2007, 02:50 PM

Originally Posted by Redegal

I bet if you talked to him you would find out he's got at least some goodies other the hood.

Stock for stock the GN ran a 13.9 @99 compared to the mid to low 13 sec capability of the LS1.

i believe it was 14.2.....compared to low 13

**JwMonE99** · 11-26-2007, 06:49 PM

Originally Posted by TransAm11973

I would have to be some sort of IDIOT to want to go on a ford mustang website when I drive an LS1. Seriously. Why is it that its the other way around. Enough of this we respect all cars on this site............waaa waaa waaa only a wus stang owner would come on a GM LS1 site, makes no sense

WTF are you to come on here to say that, what gives you the power to tell him what to do?

**basballny2** · 11-26-2007, 07:08 PM

every1 stfu ..... its over .... back to wut we were talking about......

**Redegal** · 11-26-2007, 10:11 PM

Originally Posted by basballny2

i believe it was 14.2.....compared to low 13

Eh, Whatever...

**TrickStang37** · 11-26-2007, 10:19 PM

Originally Posted by mnypitZ

I think what a lot of people are missing is era to era comparisons. The Grand National, or even the 89 pace car Trans Am with the GN engine were built in the 80s. When most f-bodies couldnt pull off 200rwhp, and be lucky to get into the low 15s with an average driver. Secondly you are comparing a 1998 LS1 to a new Mustang with a supercharger. Just imagine if GM had continued developing the f-body into the current LSx engines, without a supercharger. Yeah there is the cubic inches argument, but lets face it, Ford could have upped the CI instead of throwing a S/C on there.

Ford couldnt have just upped the CI, the engines are huge (not displacement wise) as it is. There is very little room to grow in the modular. It's not about "developing". Also, you can compare an 02 F Bod to an 03 Cobra, your only talking one year difference.