Cam suggestions......

[garygnu65]

do poly motor mounts while doing headers.you are in california what about emissions?

[Darkrider02]

man i dont think im going to let emissions get in the way of getting faster

[Darkrider02]

what about tick polluter cam?

[Firebirdjones]

I know this might sound like BS ,but that F13 along with my LS6 Heads ,3.73 gear, SS4000 yank ,and stock SLP Dual/Dual cat-back ,my car is quiet as hell and drives just as good when I had the TSP 224 cam and 3200vig with stock 3.23's .

Don't be afraid of a 230/232 cam. I'm sure you know that it's all in the tune.

It's not the 230 at .050 cam that I'm worried about. I have a couple of cars here with 250+ at .050 and they drive nice on the street. I'm sure I could get the 230 cam to do the same, I'm just not looking to make my 4th gen the fastest thing out there. I only run a 3400 converter in it and don't plan to go any larger. It's a nice cruiser, I'm not really looking for too much of a choppy idle per say either.
The lobe profiles peaked my interest. They seem to differ from Comps version of the cam.

[PFM]

TV2 or a F14

[need4z]

Ya, I was looking at their F5 cam on a 114 (224/228) for mine. Looks very much like the 224/228 cam straight out of Comps catalog, but their is no mention of the lobe profile on Futrals site. Something is a tad different though because the lift is a reverse split for Futral and the other way around on Comps site. Prices are about the same.

Allan Futral uses Cam Motion lobes. FACT: His cams have on average produced more hp and tq on various dynos vs comp lobes. The F13 is about the perfect sized cam for a 346 if you balance out everything. That cam loves TFS 215 or AFR 205 heads milled down to 59 to 60cc. Ported FAST 90/90 with all the bolt ons and I've seen numbers anywhere from 460-480 RWHP with a great torque curve as well on a manual car.