Results 1 to 14 of 14
Thread: Knight Rider trans am vs mustang
-
12-31-2007, 10:47 AM #1
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- Houston TEXAS
- Age
- 41
- Posts
- 466
ASC# 285 Born Oct 26 2001- 2002 Collectors EDTA
Knight Rider trans am vs mustang
Good Read hehe
http://www.popularmechanics.com/auto...s/4237588.html
heheh
Acceleration: 0 to 60 mph: 0.2 seconds with power boosters. Standing quarter mile: 4.286 secondsLast edited by Rojerlockless; 12-31-2007 at 11:07 AM.
-
12-31-2007, 11:09 AM #2
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- Houston TEXAS
- Age
- 41
- Posts
- 466
ASC# 285 Born Oct 26 2001- 2002 Collectors EDTA
haha the new knight rider doesn't have a flame thrower the old one does! =p
-
12-31-2007, 11:53 AM #3
sorry man repost
http://www.ls1.com/forums/showthread.php?t=73373
-
12-31-2007, 12:08 PM #4
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- Houston TEXAS
- Age
- 41
- Posts
- 466
ASC# 285 Born Oct 26 2001- 2002 Collectors EDTA
oh well
still cool =p i want a car that can go 0-60 in .2 seconds...
-
12-31-2007, 12:15 PM #5
oh yea lol
-
12-31-2007, 12:36 PM #6
hahahaha did anyone notice that the mustang KITT has 24 hour roadside assistance!!!!!!
you see even though its KITT , its still a FORD POS so one must have 24hr assistance.
-
12-31-2007, 01:11 PM #7
How bout this....
I have yet to see someone make a mock-up of how KITT would look as a 1998-2002 Trans Am....why? But I did see a 1998-2002 Trans Am on E-Bay a while back that was an actual update of KITT. I think the guy wanted like $20-25,000. Has anyone seen that car? Does anyone have any pics of this car?
-
01-01-2008, 10:23 AM #8
the new kitt is a disgrace to the knight rider series. plus, not really a fair comparison of the two cars, the main one being the original KITT car is 25 years older, alot of technology changes in the 2 1/2 decades. The made for tv movie will bomb huge.
-
01-01-2008, 10:49 AM #9
A futuristic car with a retro designed?????WTF??????WTF?????
This just sounds retarded. Who would make a bad ass car of the future and make it look old?This just stinks.
-
01-01-2008, 01:11 PM #10
Sorry, but KITT is and always should be a Trans AM. I like all F-bodies but I think it would still be odd if KITT were a Camaro. I dunno maybe its because I was a kid when Knight Rider came out and thats the reason for my feelings. I know we're not going to watch the TV movie mainly because they choose a Mustang over a TA.
Also GM is at fault for this. I'm glade they're bringing the Camaro back, however why couldn't they bring back the Trans AM? Mustangs are a POS in my honest opinion but atleast Ford never screwed the customer base by cancelling and all american sports car icon legend.
Who ever was the person or people who decided to stop making TA's and Camaros should have thier assholes sewn shut for life.
-
01-01-2008, 01:24 PM #11
I agree with jamessr
-
01-01-2008, 03:39 PM #12
-
01-01-2008, 05:44 PM #13
some one kill mustangs and ford..... kitt is a pontiac and shuld have stayed pontiac ... they shuld have used a g8 or something .... i think new kitt is b/s
-
01-02-2008, 09:39 AM #14
Or the GTO, I dont hate the mustangs but I do agree that it should of stayed a trans am or even the new GTO
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
New Mustang as Knight Rider (not news...)
By JwMonE99 in forum Almost Anything GoesReplies: 74Last Post: 02-18-2008, 09:39 PM -
New Knight Rider Mustang
By Black R/A in forum Almost Anything GoesReplies: 19Last Post: 02-15-2008, 04:49 PM -
New TV Knight Rider is officially a Mustang
By apache in forum Almost Anything GoesReplies: 11Last Post: 02-06-2008, 05:15 AM -
WTF....Knight Rider with a Mustang!!!!!!!
By 01ws6er in forum Almost Anything GoesReplies: 10Last Post: 01-06-2008, 12:52 PM
Bookmarks