Results 121 to 140 of 583
-
08-26-2006, 10:21 PM #121
nope...03/04 cobra's aren't slow...why do you think as an LS1 owner i have it modded all to hell with a cam that the pistons had to be fly cut for to fit with my heads.
it's all fun and games in the end...there are wicked cobras out there just like there are wicked LS1's, etc.
-
08-28-2006, 04:43 AM #122
-
08-28-2006, 07:55 PM #123Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2006
- Location
- new england
- Posts
- 56
Torch Red- 2K3 SVT Cobra 10th Av.
-
08-28-2006, 07:57 PM #124Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2006
- Location
- new england
- Posts
- 56
Torch Red- 2K3 SVT Cobra 10th Av.
-
08-29-2006, 04:36 AM #125
-
08-31-2006, 06:06 AM #126Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2006
- Location
- new england
- Posts
- 56
Torch Red- 2K3 SVT Cobra 10th Av.
i am sure... the thing was no fun to work on though, even for a basic tune up... i am used to easier stuff i guess... i used to own a 91 LX 5.0 and you don't get any easier then that... my cobra is fairly simple and straight forward as well...
i know they stuff the motor in there like they do for weight distribution, god knows they had room to move it forward more if they wanted too.
thats why i was put off by the idea of heads, because they look like a nightmare to get off w/ the engine in the car since more then half the motor is in under the firewall.
someone once told me you can't ge tthe rear head bolts out because they hit the firewall, and you lift the head off the block w/ the bolts unscrewed but still in the head... has to go back in same way.
i don't know, never tried, just what i heard.
-
08-31-2006, 06:41 AM #127Evr sena bdgr killa snak?
- Join Date
- Dec 2005
- Location
- Research Triangle Park, NC
- Age
- 48
- Posts
- 1,811
Pewter- '99 Z28 M6
I just did a head swap on my Z the last couple weeks. I prolly told you about that already. I had a lot of stuff to do, so it has taken about 2 10 hr Saturdays, and about 4 or 5 2/3 hr after-work days. And a whole lot of bread.
Hell, I am just now getting to the damn blown slave, and that was the reason I parked it!!!
That trans is proving to be the biggest headache of all, just cause I don't have the proper workplace. Heads weren't that bad, except I had two rear bolts on the driver's side that acted like the threads were stripped or sumthin'. I think it was cause GM put some dried loctite garbage on there, and caused a seal, so as the bolt was going down it was compressing the chamber, instead of allowing air to pass. Hope I don't get a nasty coolant leak. I will be real f*k'n MAD.
Otherwise, the head swap wasn't that bad. I put the cam in there too, it wasn't too bad either. That damn tranny is longer than the driveshaft, seems like. Looks real heavy. I am going to have to dead lift it to get it back in, and I am not looking forward to lining up the input shaft, dead lifting it, AND trying to get a bolt in her p*ssy at the same time.
Gonna be like givin' to a woman and
at the same time. REAL FRICKIN HARD!!! haha
You wanna help hurtindude, I'll buy the beer!!!
-
08-31-2006, 09:31 AM #128Awaiting Activation
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Location
- Dixie
- Posts
- 102
-
08-31-2006, 09:35 AM #129Awaiting Activation
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Location
- Dixie
- Posts
- 102
-
08-31-2006, 09:38 AM #130Awaiting Activation
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Location
- Dixie
- Posts
- 102
-
08-31-2006, 09:42 AM #131Awaiting Activation
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Location
- Dixie
- Posts
- 102
I'd like to see that link. All I have seen at 20 psi are nowhere near a screw blower on torque. Mine makes 580 rwt well below 4k rpm. If you seen a PC making 580 he had to be pushing well over 25 psi. That's one reason not many run a PC on an 03/04. To get the low end you have to pump a lot of air through it. I'm talking about a street driveable car with the stock bottom end. At 25 psi the bottom end will fall out of an 03 eventually.
-
08-31-2006, 10:15 AM #132Evr sena bdgr killa snak?
- Join Date
- Dec 2005
- Location
- Research Triangle Park, NC
- Age
- 48
- Posts
- 1,811
Pewter- '99 Z28 M6
I meant the SLOPE of the curve. Screw type superchargers make massive low-end torque, but the curve decreases, or stays pretty much flat, with RPM's. With centrifugals the low end torque is not impressive, but it improves with rpm, like the hp curve.
That is a sweet time on that Cobra by the way.
04 with Procharger, note the torque curve increases with engine speed.
http://www.mustangmuscleonline.com/FeatureRide3.aspx
I am sure you have seen thousands of 03 roots graphs where the torque curve skyrockets then levels and decreases with RPM. No need to even give a link.
Also, check out where a Z06 with a twin turbo set at 15 psi MADE MORE POWER than an 03 twin turbo at 16 psi.
Chalk one up for the 2V LS6 engine vs. the "boost-friendly" 4V Cobra.
http://www.turbochargedpower.com/
BTW, I never said the Procharger would make more torque, I said it would RESEMBLE the HP curve.Last edited by Roastem; 08-31-2006 at 10:21 AM.
-
08-31-2006, 12:17 PM #133Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2006
- Location
- new england
- Posts
- 56
Torch Red- 2K3 SVT Cobra 10th Av.
our cobras have no umph with less then 4Gs on the tach anyway.. so for me, a twin screw vs a procharger isn't a desision made based upon low end torque.
i personally like the prochargers more because of less heat soak compaired to any charger on top of the motor, of the factory "heaton", and they are more efficent..
i am with roastem on this one, procharger all the way.
As for the Z06 making more power... well thats to be expected at similar boost levels... more displacement.. and we all know the tried and true saying that there is no replacement for displacement... Z06 also has much higher compression, which gives additional power as well. The 4v cobra is designed for boost w/ 4v and low compression... so rather then displacement and compression, you add more boost and fuel... thats your power adder...
at some point you are going to start to grenade things, but that is true on any car.Last edited by hurtindude; 08-31-2006 at 12:25 PM.
-
08-31-2006, 12:36 PM #134
I need a supercharger i am getting beat by cars that have turbo a mustang GT had a turbo and did not tell me and smoked me he ran 12.5 and i ran 13.8. I hate cobras one beat me in quater mile he ran 13.1 and i ran 13.5. How embarrasing i lost to 2 mustangs.
-
09-01-2006, 09:54 AM #135Awaiting Activation
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Location
- Dixie
- Posts
- 102
Torque gets you off the line(ET) and HP gets you down the track(speed). A roots blower will not drop off that much. I'll try to post a link to my Eaton and KB dyno sheets. It's the area under the curve that makes a good race car and getting that torque down low improves that greatly.
For a daily driver, you can't beat a roots blower especially stop light to stop light although I won't street race. Usually if someone messes with me I can give the car 3/4 throttle in third at 60 mph and it will roast the tires but I'm also running a 3.90 gear. That's my limit of showing my ass. It usually sends most looking elsewhere.
I didn't read your link but it isn't an apples/apples comparison. To begin with, if you put forced induction on a car with 10.5 CR then it will make more power per pound of boost compared to an engine with 8.5:1 like the 03 Cobra. And it will be making more junk per pound of boost when the pistons melt. FI needs 8.5 CR or less. Anything over that is not good especially appoaching 10:1. Like I said, I didn't read your link so I don't know what each engine has done to it or size in CI's. But, I will tell you this, a 281 four valve engine will make more power than a 350 2v push rod engine at the same boost levels because of the heads on the 4v. The owner of Accufab runs a basic 281 4V with twin turbos and he's running over 200 in NMRA.
-
09-01-2006, 10:04 AM #136Awaiting Activation
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Location
- Dixie
- Posts
- 102
This is my last dyno with the Eaton using a chiller I made for the IC. It dyno'd about as high as any stock unported Eaton I've seen. The curves are on seprate graphs but you can still see all the area under the curve and how raising torque down low increase that area. It means the amount of work it does. HP is work. The torque may have dropped off but at 5000 RPM it's HP that is getting the car down the track at speed.

This is with the KB and a crappy tune. It runs pig rich at high RPM's but it's safe. This is about the same boost as the Eaton graph above around 19 psi. You can see the difference in parasitic loss of roots versus screw. If you look at a PC, the torque will lessen the area under the curve. You'd have to really up the boost to run with a KB. A PC at 19 psi on an 03 will lose badly to an 03 with a KB at the same boost.
Last edited by Pumped03; 09-01-2006 at 10:10 AM.
-
09-01-2006, 11:23 AM #137Evr sena bdgr killa snak?
- Join Date
- Dec 2005
- Location
- Research Triangle Park, NC
- Age
- 48
- Posts
- 1,811
Pewter- '99 Z28 M6
Displacement doesn't mean anything? Your spicket might be a little bigger, but your bucket is 20% smaller.
That LS6 engine had head work done and low compression pistons, if I am not mistaken.
LS series heads that have port work and big valves can flow a massive amount of air. Vipers and Z06's both have 2V engines, the Cobra has a 4V and needs a supercharger to match their output?
How many N/A 281 cube 4V Cobra's have you seen that make 500 rwhp. Not too many, I gather. You can find Z06's all over putting that down.
Now if you had 351 cubes and a 4V motor, then you can start talkin' N/A turkey. I don't know why they haven't added big cubes to a 4V engine. I would love to see a 429 cu. in. 4V motor in a new Cobra. Add a supercharger to that baby and well...it will get ugly for the competition.
-
09-01-2006, 12:40 PM #138
"How many N/A 281 cube 4V Cobra's have you seen that make 500 rwhp. Not too many, I gather. You can find Z06's all over putting that down."
Hell i have a hillbilly raggedy ass 347 camaro and its putting down damn near that N/A
-
09-03-2006, 01:26 AM #139Junior Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Location
- Fresno
- Age
- 44
- Posts
- 21
Red- 1993 Mazda rx7
Hey Roastem, sorry to get off toipc here but... that looks like a big ass catfish on your avatar. How big was it?
-
09-03-2006, 01:37 PM #140Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Location
- Long Island, NY
- Posts
- 123
Black- 1987 Grand National
If he had a turbocharged Mustang and only ran a 12.5, he should be shot. My turbocharged 99 GT ran a well documented 10.92 on the bone stock longblock & pump gas. I had a great setup and DFI tuned by Job Spetter Jr. but 12.5 I hope was at 6 psi or less. Then it would make sense.
Hell, my little 231 ci(Now built 235) would run that with $300 in mods. Don't be embarrassed, I killed many unsuspecting GM vehicles with my GT. My GN is well built also and I spared a C5 today that was screwing with me. Getting older and having a son has calmed me down I guess.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
2008 Cobra Jet Mustang - Return Of The Cobra Jets
By Ed Blown Vert in forum Almost Anything GoesReplies: 1Last Post: 05-27-2009, 09:16 AM -
Ford 428 Cobra Jet Build - Deadly Cobra - Engine T
By Ed Blown Vert in forum Almost Anything GoesReplies: 0Last Post: 11-17-2008, 11:40 AM -
Mr T facts
By Nastyfoot in forum Almost Anything GoesReplies: 12Last Post: 12-10-2006, 05:50 PM -
Pinks:All Out [New series, straight heads-up racing]
By Warbird in forum Almost Anything GoesReplies: 3Last Post: 11-08-2006, 09:39 PM -
facts to ponder
By Zboner in forum Almost Anything GoesReplies: 16Last Post: 03-28-2006, 11:10 PM






Bookmarks