Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 131
  1. #41
    Member Ls1_385hp_T/A's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Nor-Cal
    Posts
    543

    Black
    1999 Trans Am Ws6/M6

    Quote Originally Posted by clg82 View Post
    I can't believe that's all they run with 400+ horsepower.....?!?!!?
    Yeah, pretty much all the new "muscle" cars suck

  2. #42
    Member 01 SS Vert's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Knoxville, TN
    Posts
    301

    White
    01 SS Vert

    $8K market adjustment....what a joke. If anything, they need to LOWER the price with this shitty economy we are having lately. Hood luck selling it when you can get just about any car you want for that price.

    I love the looks, hate the price. Great job by Dodge, but like most domestic manufacturers....they produce a product that the public likes about 3 years too late.

  3. #43
    Something Diabolical... chuckie669's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    Posts
    2,677
    2000 C5 Torch Red

    If you check out ebay you can find em in some different colors. The silver/black and black/black look pretty nice. They need to release it in the plum crazy purple color and it will be sick! Although the price tag will deter many.
    http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Cars-...6.m14.l1308#lg

    http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Cars-...3756.m14.l1318

    http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Cars-...3756.m14.l1308

  4. #44
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    South of Heaven
    Posts
    121

    Black
    2002 WS6

    Black looks great. I don't know why they are building so many orange ones. The fuel mileage is horrible for a modern V8. Should have good power with mods, but the car is too heavy.

    Beautiful styling though.

  5. #45
    Member BrntWS6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Land of the FOID
    Posts
    330

    SOM
    2002 WS6 M6 - 461hp 406tq

    Yeah Plum crazy would be a great color to bring back. Didn't realize the first year were numbered car's, so I'm guessing that's part of the reason for dealer mark-up. How much more desirable will that really make them later though?

  6. #46
    2004 HEAD/CAM CTS-V 9t8z28's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    doylestown, Pa
    Posts
    6,817

    SILVER
    2004 CTS-V

    Quote Originally Posted by 310stanger View Post
    This car is kinda like the hot chick from hs that is now fat. You finally get to bang her and you find out that shes just heavy and her performance in bed isnt what you thought it was gonna be. Nothing but a let down and low return on the investment lol
    Haha! So true!

  7. #47
    2004 HEAD/CAM CTS-V 9t8z28's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    doylestown, Pa
    Posts
    6,817

    SILVER
    2004 CTS-V

    Quote Originally Posted by Too Fast View Post
    F@#kin' sexy. Long hood, short deck. Sexy, reminds me of me '67 GTO I had. Heavy pig, tho. 425 factory HP makes up for that. Gas MPG sux.
    Not even close! 67 GTO's are big cars and very long.

  8. #48
    down in it 310stanger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    nj
    Age
    43
    Posts
    11,020

    white
    90 Mustang 5.0

    Quote Originally Posted by 9t8z28 View Post
    Not even close! 67 GTO's are big cars and very long.
    Yeah I was thinking the same thing. That body style is nothing like this one. The 67 gto had more of a sedan look with a big trunk lol IMO the 67 GTO is one of the best looking cars in automobile history and this challenger is not even one of the best looking cars to come out in the last 5 yrs lol

  9. #49
    Formulatastic yellowv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    S. Florida
    Age
    47
    Posts
    1,271

    Red
    98 Formula /93 Z28

    Thats what people forget. They expect the new musclecars to be lightweight, high horsepower, great handling, exotic looking supercars. When in actuality musclecars started out as big, heavy, plain looking, horibble handling and braking cars with a big engine. That is why I never understood people complaints when the new GTO came out and people complained it was plain looking and didn't handle well enough. I think the new Challenger is damn nice and should perform quite well for what it is. You have to think Chrysler is not building these things for us, but rich older guys that can afford to spend 50 grand on a retro musclecar. The only thing i have a complaint about is the price. Especially with the markup.

  10. #50
    Formulatastic yellowv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    S. Florida
    Age
    47
    Posts
    1,271

    Red
    98 Formula /93 Z28

    Oh and yeah an old Goat and a Challenger new or old have nothing in common looks wise at all.

  11. #51
    Junior Member dfillmore827's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    joppa,md
    Posts
    60

    Blue Metallic
    1999 Chevrolet Camaro SS

    Quote Originally Posted by snaggeltooth View Post
    cant wait to hear what people say when the new Camaro gets here ...
    yea really, the new camaro isnt the prettiest car in the world either, personally the taillights on the concept are ugly

  12. #52
    member since may 2000 nhraformula's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    n/w chicago
    Age
    56
    Posts
    6,932

    black
    2000 nhra edition formula

    Quote Originally Posted by 01 SS Vert View Post
    $8K market adjustment....what a joke. If anything, they need to LOWER the price with this shitty economy we are having lately. Hood luck selling it when you can get just about any car you want for that price.

    .
    dude, those cars are selling even with the mark up, shitty economy or not.
    2000 nhra edition formula
    a few bolt ons, 379 rwhp
    11.96 @113.25

  13. #53
    Senior Member snaggeltooth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    alabama
    Posts
    7,203

    Gray
    2012 Challenger R/T

    Quote Originally Posted by dfillmore827 View Post
    yea really, the new camaro isnt the prettiest car in the world either, personally the taillights on the concept are ugly
    just saying ...People complained when the GTO came out , when the new Mustang came out , when the Challenger came out ..exspect alot more when the new Camaro comes out .. Seems the only thing they dont complain about is when the C6 came out and that thing dont look half as good as the C5,,,my 2 cents

  14. #54
    Paid 2 Post Daycrew SexOnWheels's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Canada
    Age
    46
    Posts
    9,481

    Blood Red
    Z28

    Did you hear it run pecha?

    Also nice KTM!

  15. #55
    Senior Member snaggeltooth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    alabama
    Posts
    7,203

    Gray
    2012 Challenger R/T


  16. #56
    NY Representative basballny2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    NeW YoRk
    Posts
    3,394

    Red
    2001 ws6

    nice looking car IMO

  17. #57
    Senior Member clg82's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    California
    Age
    43
    Posts
    2,453
    2000 Trans Am

    Quote Originally Posted by snaggeltooth View Post
    That isn't stock ^^^^ i still can't believe they don't run very fast with 400+ horsepower.........i hope the g8 GXP isn't this disapointing when it comes out!!

  18. #58
    Senior Member pecha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    2,439

    black
    98 WS6

    Quote Originally Posted by 01 SS Vert View Post
    $8K market adjustment....what a joke. If anything, they need to LOWER the price with this shitty economy we are having lately. Hood luck selling it when you can get just about any car you want for that price.

    I love the looks, hate the price. Great job by Dodge, but like most domestic manufacturers....they produce a product that the public likes about 3 years too late.
    put the crack pipe down bro
    most of them in bay area and LA area have already deposits on
    it's hard to just go into dealership and buy one
    AND ON TOP OF THAT the car is gone already!

  19. #59
    Senior Member Too Fast's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Age
    62
    Posts
    5,188

    Black
    2000 WS6 6spd Hooker LT

    Quote Originally Posted by 9t8z28 View Post
    Not even close! 67 GTO's are big cars and very long.
    Actually a '67 GTO was a mid size car back in the day! Do you remember how long the Grand Prixs were? Or a Bonneville? I still think the new Challenger is great looking, haven't seen one in person tho to see how big it is. I loved my '67 GTO, my wife totalled it almost 10 years ago. IMO the Challenger has classic styling like the '67 GTO did.

  20. #60
    King 0f n00bz shady milkman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Shepherd, Michigan
    Age
    37
    Posts
    11,770

    blacker than wesleysnipes
    98' trans am

    Quote Originally Posted by clg82 View Post
    That isn't stock ^^^^ i still can't believe they don't run very fast with 400+ horsepower.........i hope the g8 GXP isn't this disapointing when it comes out!!
    dont get so caught up into h/p numbers...that doesnt mean shit..the power to weight ratio is where it is at.

Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. challenger vs. me
    By Ws6islife in forum Firebird / WS6
    Replies: 65
    Last Post: 05-31-2010, 07:20 PM
  2. 98 ss vs 09 challenger rt
    By ivan1 in forum Kill Stories
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 05-03-2010, 10:01 PM
  3. 02 z/28 vs 09?srt-8 challenger
    By blue02Z in forum Kill Stories
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 03-30-2010, 11:24 AM
  4. Challenger R/T
    By 1 RedHot TransAm in forum Kill Stories
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-19-2010, 11:27 PM
  5. 2008 Dodge Challenger SRT8 - '08 Challenger SRT8
    By Ed Blown Vert in forum Almost Anything Goes
    Replies: 82
    Last Post: 04-13-2008, 11:19 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •