Results 41 to 60 of 68
-
12-03-2009, 12:05 PM #41
Obviously driver mod in both instances. I MURDERED a slightly older Cobalt SS stage 2, whatever that means, when I was a bolt on car but that's not a fair comparison. Also had a 16-17 yr old kid talkin shit to my buddy in his cai and catback T/A last year about how bad his 09 coballt ss would take us blah blah..saw him about 2 weeks later and raped him without lube as well.
Back to straight line vs cornering...I have never driven one so I wouldn't know, but how many times have we heard that American cars can't handle, especially pertaining to ls1 f-bodies? The answer is far too many, and this is also an American car. Now we get into the tuner/ricer market with these cars which is were many of these "claims" of "tuner" cars with "superior" handling capability compared to American cars are coming from. I don't even want to begin going into this argument, just stating my observations on the subject.
My 01 T/A with no front way bar, completely stock suspension (yea thats right I dont even have sfc's) and stock springs/shocks with 94k on the clock handles pretty damn well and I push my car pretty hard through corners. Now, its nothing compared to even an f-body with suspension mods but it damn sure doesnt suck.
-
12-03-2009, 12:09 PM #42
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Location
- Milwaukee
- Posts
- 3,276
Arctic White, red/gray- 1997 Corvette, 92 Typhoon
The older cobalts were low 14 second cars, almost 1/2 second slower. Im not saying the new SS si that fast, a ls1 should win that race. As for handling the new cobalt SS has set a couple records for being on of the fastest FWD cars out there, even keeping up and sometimes beating the evo X and STI on some courses. F-bodys handle decent but there are many better platforms for handling.
-
12-03-2009, 12:10 PM #43
Isn't this the point of a DD...? Also, I wasn't comparing the Cobalt SS and Camaro v6...In case you missed it I was voicing my extreme dissapointment with the 2010 Camaro especially with it being used as a DD. The base model Cobalt (or any other car for that matter) would obviously be the much better choice for one who is looking solely for a commuter car/ DD
Last edited by 01ws6er; 12-03-2009 at 12:18 PM.
-
12-03-2009, 12:12 PM #44
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Location
- Milwaukee
- Posts
- 3,276
Arctic White, red/gray- 1997 Corvette, 92 Typhoon
-
12-03-2009, 12:21 PM #45
-
12-03-2009, 12:30 PM #46
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Location
- Milwaukee
- Posts
- 3,276
Arctic White, red/gray- 1997 Corvette, 92 Typhoon
http://www.autospies.com/news/Car-an...ars-Did-35974/
This is from car and drivers lightning lap
2008 Times
LL5 MOSLER MT900S 2:45.9
LL3 DODGE VIPER SRT10 ACR 2:48.6
LL5 FERRARI 430 SCUDERIA 2:54.6
LL3 NISSAN GT-R 2:55.6
LL2 CHEVROLET CORVETTE Z51 3:01.2
LL2 CADILLAC CTS-V 3:04.0
LL2 BMW M3 3:05.6
LL2 MERCEDES-BENZ C63 AMG 3:06.5
LL1 CHEVROLET COBALT SS TURBOCHARGED 3:13.0
LL2 MITSUBISHI LANCER EVOLUTION MR 3:13.3
LL2 BMW 135i 3:13.7
LL2 LEXUS IS F 3:14.0
LL2 AUDI S5 3:14.6
LL2 HONDA S2000 CR 3:15.0
LL2 DODGE CHALLENGER SRT8 3:16.3
LL2 LOTUS ELISE SC 3:16.6
LL2 INFINITI G37 SPORT 3:17.5
LL2 SUBARU IMPREZA WRX STI 3:19.0
LL1 DODGE CALIBER SRT4 3:20.8
LL2 VOLKSWAGEN R32 3:21.8
LL2 HONDA CIVIC MUGEN Si 3:24.8
LL1 VOLVO C30 T5 VERSION 2.0 3:26.6
If you ask me the cobalt ss beat some impressive cars and the cars that beat it are some super pricey autos.Last edited by Zinergy; 12-03-2009 at 12:50 PM.
-
12-03-2009, 01:20 PM #47
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Location
- Toronto
- Posts
- 1,083
SOM- 2002 SS
The big problem when comparing the 2 is the cobalt is smaller, and is FWD. I don't think I will ever own anything that has the words 'performance' and 'front wheel drive' linked in its description. Well actually not I like the civic si but that's more of a grocery getter with a little cool motor that can rev.
I have issues with the new camaro but see some potential in modifications. Stock they look like tanks and I still cant warm up to the rear end. even from the side some of the styling gets to me. I hate the steering wheel and the interior is almost horrible but some things are neat like the guages and centre stack etc.
those are mainly the reasons why I am leaning heavily towards the new stang v-6. Rumors from detroit are that on tighter racetracks they are outgunning the new 430 hp coyote powered GTs. Less weight and better weight balance are said to be why.
I do want a daily driver but I want something that i can maintain and work on. Something that will last a long time and look great. Styling that is timeless. something that has presence and has history (camaro and stang). Those are some of the reasons why I did buy my 01 =)
-
12-03-2009, 01:27 PM #48
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Location
- Milwaukee
- Posts
- 3,276
Arctic White, red/gray- 1997 Corvette, 92 Typhoon
Yes the cobalt is small. But the other cars mentions are midsize 15 foot cars. IMO you have the vette for history and presence now get a economical car that you wont get bored with. If the evo and subarus arent fast enough for you, some exhaust work and a tune will get you 40-70 more whp, easily putting those cars into the 12s and raping the v6 stang or camaro. But if you really want that mustang and can get a deal cause you work for ford then do what you want and get it. Life is about making you and your family happy if the v6 stang does that for you then go for it.
-
12-03-2009, 01:58 PM #49
I own both an Ls1 f-body and an 09 Cobalt SS. There is such a massive difference in handling that it's not even funny.
If you've never driven a Cobalt SS, then yea, an fbody with minor suspension mods will grip "well", but in comparison it doesn't even hold a candle to the Cobalt. It puts and end to the "American cars don't handle" image, as seen by thhe track times posted earlier
-
12-03-2009, 02:01 PM #50
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Location
- Toronto
- Posts
- 1,083
SOM- 2002 SS
Well I dont want an economical car that I dont care about. If I dont like the way it looks, i just wont care about it. Sadly the sub,mistu and cobalt all fall in that category.
-
12-03-2009, 02:05 PM #51
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Location
- Toronto
- Posts
- 1,083
SOM- 2002 SS
I know im being a bastard about it and there are better and worse looking cars of each but..
VS
..Comon... if you had a choice....
-
12-03-2009, 02:12 PM #52
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Location
- Toronto
- Posts
- 1,083
SOM- 2002 SS
I know which interior I'd rather interact with every day. I'm not saying the cobalt interior is bad or uglier. i just prefer the stang. I like the retro guages. i also love it when the console is high and fat and the shifter doesn't look like a school bus shifter sticking out of the floor.
VS
-
12-03-2009, 02:12 PM #53
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Location
- Milwaukee
- Posts
- 3,276
Arctic White, red/gray- 1997 Corvette, 92 Typhoon
-
12-03-2009, 02:19 PM #54
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Location
- Toronto
- Posts
- 1,083
SOM- 2002 SS
I guess debating car styling is very very subjective we all know that. I think a legacy looks like a maxima or any other daily driver I see moms driving every day. I need something sexy. My wife says it all the time maybe I should get a custom plate that says NVRGROUP
-
12-03-2009, 02:22 PM #55
Suggestion: If you are particularly irritated by another member's posting habits and are constantly fighting the urge to flame them, you can click on that person's profile, and select "Add to ignore list." This will make that person's posts invisible to you.
-
12-03-2009, 04:01 PM #56
-
12-03-2009, 06:28 PM #57
-
12-04-2009, 07:12 AM #58
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Location
- Milwaukee
- Posts
- 3,276
Arctic White, red/gray- 1997 Corvette, 92 Typhoon
Yea I bought the legacy because I wanted a sti that didnt look like a tuner car more of a sleeper and because I hardly ever see any legacys even mroe so turbo legacys, they seem few and far between. I just think having a v6 stang or camaro is like stuffing your pants. Sure you look good at first but when its time to take those pants off your in for disappointment.
-
12-04-2009, 07:34 AM #59
I wouldn't, if it isn't the SS model, or a v8 that is optioned out, its not really my taste.
-
12-27-2009, 04:51 AM #60
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Location
- OHIO
- Posts
- 70
WHITE- 99 CAMARO SS
keep your z
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Question: Too Trade or not to trade
By BiGPaPaSMuRF in forum Camaro / SSReplies: 14Last Post: 09-07-2011, 02:37 PM -
GTO trade for a 5th Gen ??
By snaggeltooth in forum GTOReplies: 63Last Post: 05-21-2010, 01:10 PM -
Anyone interested in a A4 for M6 trade or WS6 wheel trade near upstate SC?
By Maul in forum Southern MembersReplies: 7Last Post: 12-01-2006, 07:54 AM -
To trade or not to trade
By Mark01WS6 in forum GM TrucksReplies: 13Last Post: 08-10-2006, 04:24 AM -
F/S or Trade: 02 Explorer Sport 4X4 2 door 43kMi Trade up or down
By NDelmoore in forum Vehicles For Sale / TradeReplies: 2Last Post: 08-06-2006, 04:05 PM
Bookmarks