Results 521 to 540 of 1145
Thread: Been testing Oil
-
05-29-2009, 11:57 AM #521
hmmm.. was checking this out on the amsoil site, then cross-checked with the nmma.org site list of their approved/certified oils... http://nmma.org/certification/progra...asp?y=TCW32008
and Amsoil isn't listed at all, anywhere in the list... wonder why?? is it REALLY certified/approved???? interesting...
was happy to see the pennzoil multipurpose stuff I got yesterday was on the list tho :-) even tho it's not a synthetic... which is what I would really like to use, which was why I was looking into the amsoil... heh...
.Last edited by 06MonteSS; 05-29-2009 at 12:08 PM.
06MonteSS
2006 Monte Carlo SS -- CAI, Poly mounts, STB's,
Flowmaster Super 40's, Custom DiabLew Tune!
Email: 06MonteSS@diablewtune.com
-
05-29-2009, 03:15 PM #522
-
05-29-2009, 07:31 PM #523
-
05-30-2009, 06:28 AM #524
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- Texas Department of Corrections
- Posts
- 18,128
- Retired Outlaw Sum Bitch
I get your point. All I am saying is get a TC-W3 2stroke oil. Regardless of brand. We are saying the same thing.
Now with that said I don't get my BVD's in a wad over certifications. Be they API or whomever. I look at the specs of the lube. Certification is just another way for organizations to make money. I'll have a look at this Amsoil oil and report.
-
05-30-2009, 06:34 AM #525
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- Texas Department of Corrections
- Posts
- 18,128
- Retired Outlaw Sum Bitch
Well it (Amsoil HP Injector oil) meets TC-W3 (actually exceeds it)....has superior add packs.....
Originally Posted by Amsoil
But the bottom line I would use the Amsoil with no hesitation.
-
05-30-2009, 08:24 AM #526
-
05-30-2009, 09:49 AM #527
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- Texas Department of Corrections
- Posts
- 18,128
- Retired Outlaw Sum Bitch
Well we really haven't "documented" any positives or negatives amongst the various brands of TC-W3 oils out there. One would assume more detergency is a good thing but I could not say definitively one way or the other.
-
05-31-2009, 03:03 PM #528
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Location
- North Jersey
- Posts
- 11,496
Phantom Black Metallic- 2004 GTO M6
My customers don't complain when we use AMSoil instead of the recommended Castrol or Mobil1. Surprises me when they tell my boss they have heard high praises regarding AMSoil.
-
05-31-2009, 03:04 PM #529
Sarge -- using the oil as recommended, is there still a need to occasionally run a fuel system cleaner like Chevron Techron?
-
05-31-2009, 03:08 PM #530
-
05-31-2009, 03:13 PM #531
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- Texas Department of Corrections
- Posts
- 18,128
- Retired Outlaw Sum Bitch
I run either Shell/Chevron-Texaco gas almost exclusively. Top Tier gas needs less "cleaning"....the 2 stroke oil does clean and treat (moisture/corrosives)....however I use Techron 2wice a year myself.
Top Tier Gasoline Retailers:
76
Chevron
Conoco
Entec Stations
Kwik Trip/Kwik Star
MFA Oil Company
Phillips
QuikTrip
Shell
Somerset Refinery
Texaco
Tri-Par Oil Company
Canada:
Petro-Canada
Shell-Canada
Sunoco-Canada
Chevron-Canada
Hawaii:
Aloha Petroleum
-
05-31-2009, 03:19 PM #532
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Location
- North Jersey
- Posts
- 11,496
Phantom Black Metallic- 2004 GTO M6
OK. I see no mention of BP or Hess. I use:
Hess
BP
Shell
Sunoco
So then I should use Techron. Remember, I haven't used Techron since I bought my GTO. Should I use the Techron anyway?
-
05-31-2009, 07:00 PM #533
Ok I have been thinking. (I know its a bad idea)
What about using E-85 with the 2-stroke oil, like as in a race car with E-85 compatable fuel system? Now the flames can commence.
-
05-31-2009, 10:35 PM #534
To license or not to license
That’s good question. Let me see if I can help answer that.
In the lubricants industry we see a full array of third party entities which help to standardize and shape the market. These third parties organize and develop standards and specifications they feel manufacturers should adhere to. They also offer Licensing/Certification to a manufacturer which is generally very costly.
For the most part this is usually a good thing for consumers in making sure the products they buy are within grade and specification. However, these specifications that are set in place to protect the consumer can also be a hindrance in technological advances towards a better performing product.
For the sake of conversation, I’m going to pick the third party entity, American Petroleum Institute (API) rather than National Marine Manufacturers Association (NMMA).
Most anyone who has ever purchased motor oil for their car has probably noticed the API Donut and Starburst on the label of the oil bottle, e.g.
Let’s take a quick look at some motor oils which ARE currently API Licensed.
- Amsoil XL Extended Life 10W-30 Synthetic
- Schaeffer Supreme 7000 Synthetic Plus 10W-30
- Royal Purple 10W-30 High Performance
Now let’s take a look at some motor oils which are NOT API Licensed.
- Amsoil 100% Synthetic High Performance 10W-30
- Schaeffer Supreme 9000 Full Synthetic 5W-30
- Royal Purple 5W-30 XPR Extreme Performance & Racing oil
- Red Line Synthetic Oil (Nothing Red Line makes is API Licensed)
So what’s the point?
The point is there are many examples of non-licensed oils performing as well as, or in many cases better than the licensed stuff. So when you see the words “meets” or “exceed” specs on a bottle of motor oil, the chances are that manufacture has done the home work and knows how to meet or exceed the specs listed.
In the case of Amsoil, Inc., they had the first fully API qualified 100% synthetic motor oil in 1972 before API had motor oil licensing. And as noted above, Amsoil currently makes their XL line which is API licensed. Basically, Amsoil knows what goes into achieving API specs even if the end product is not going to be licensed. So why would they go through the trouble of meeting or exceeding the specs and then not licensing it? Amsoil explains this better than I can. Click HERE to read the full explanation.
Alright, so after all that, back to the question of Amsoil HP Injector TC-W3 2-cycle oil not being NMMA certified. It’s not NMMA certified, but it does meet or exceed the specs. Actually Amsoil claims it has “up to 30 percent more additives than other TC-W3 two-cycle oils for “super clean” operation” so it may very well be that it exceeds the specs, which is the story I’m sticking to.
CompSyn
-
05-31-2009, 10:44 PM #535
-
06-01-2009, 03:51 AM #536
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Location
- North Jersey
- Posts
- 11,496
Phantom Black Metallic- 2004 GTO M6
Rear seems better with the AMSoil than it did when I bought my car. Maybe it's me. I dunno.
extreme dimensions, driveshaft shop, harrop, hid(35watt/6k) lows, hurst, k&n, led fogs, maverick man, mishimoto, nitto, revshift, slp, stern st-1, smoked sidemarkers, whiteline poly radius rod bushings
-
06-01-2009, 04:46 AM #537
-
06-01-2009, 04:47 AM #538
-
06-01-2009, 04:49 AM #539
-
06-01-2009, 08:05 AM #540
Well I give to the forum my experience.
I started with Lucas then a passed to standard TC-W3 and yesterday I put for the first time HP Injector.
Lucas the worst.
Standard TC-W3 good.
Hp Injector the Best.
Why the best ?
I straight away noticed the car is more quite, in the acceleration the engine does different noise, more gloomy.
I think this is because the Viscosity index is better, the oil hold better the high temperature, and because the ratio is very low this is crucial.
I use around 700:1 ratio at moment maybe I will improve the dose and see if there are benefits.Last edited by mephy; 06-01-2009 at 09:38 AM.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 4 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 4 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Testing
By mrwdjv in forum Almost Anything GoesReplies: 5Last Post: 05-11-2009, 03:11 PM -
testing
By Spikito in forum Almost Anything GoesReplies: 55Last Post: 02-21-2009, 03:56 PM -
Well testing
By 99formulals1 in forum Almost Anything GoesReplies: 8Last Post: 11-28-2008, 08:12 PM -
Testing
By Y2KPewterSS in forum Camaro / SSReplies: 0Last Post: 04-25-2007, 06:41 PM
Bookmarks