To anyone, that is ever challenged by a GT!

[blackSS01]

He said 15k, he may have been taken to the cleaners, that I am not going to argue about. The best I have ever run was a 12.9 at 113 mph. I haven't taken it to the track in a while and have little track experience.

[sprayed cobra]

To anyone ever challenged by a Ford Mustang GT (Not Ford hating or tying to start a riot) I raced a 2003 from a 10 mph roll the other day.

He had as listed:

Supercharger with 6psi
Off road H Pipe
315/35/18's tires in the rear, 17's up front
Short throw shifter
UD Pulleys
4:11 gears
Aluminum Driveshaft
Different camshafts (don't know the exact specs)
Some other misc shit (He told me he had about $15,000 into the car)

Now, he did evenually win, but by so little and for so much more money he has in his car. In 1st I had him by about a car and a half. 2nd by about a car, 3rd still about a car, 4th he was even with me and by the top of 4th he was maybe half a fender ahead. Then we both shut it down. He was really cool and everything, but if a GT wants to race, tell him for money because unless he has a ton of money in it, not a chance.

Hes lying to you !there is no way he has 15 grand in the car .....maybe total but not in mods or you would have got really burned I have around that in mine a bit actually and you would be so far behind so dont believe him ,just another guy blowin smoke out his ass!

[sprayed cobra]

You actually think that is 15k worth of mods? That is probably round 5k depending on how much his rims were.

6psi kit? that car is probably barely over 350rwhp. Most people run almost twice that.

BINGO !!

[sprayed cobra]

how can u even say only 5k... he bougth a supercharger.. i dont care what psi you run... a supercharger costs a butt load to buy... ur right about the hp... cuz 6psi wont do much.. but the cost of 15 grand.. easily is correct

No way ......NOT EVEN CLOSE !MIne cost me 4500 Ihave meth injection as well with the proper blow off valves this guy was a bullshitter extrordinaire !

[sprayed cobra]

15k easily? Do you even have a clue?? Here is some math for ya. I should have said closer to 6k orginally.
Supercharger with 6psi-non-intercooled kit 3,000
Off road H Pipe-120 bucks
315/35/18's tires in the rear, 17's up front-I will say 1000(unknown what rims)
Short throw shifter-150
UD Pulleys-75 bucks
4:11 gears- 300 including install
Aluminum Driveshaft-250
Different camshafts (don't know the exact specs)-600

Thats 5495. I didnt know this was near zo6 MSRP.

Thats better!

[2000T/A Guru]

Id say around 6k for parts but this guy sounds like a douche bag and douche bags have parts put on at a shop so you have to factor in the shop costs and the tune, probably around 8-10k.

[Kavslayer]

8 month year old still for sale anyone?

whats a month year old???? and how much boy or gurl you got a power adder on it? new motor? tranny rear end what you got done?

[2000T/A Guru]

It has nitrous vomit spray direct port injection good stuff.

[MikeSomething]

Well, either way guys, our cars are pretty bad ass! I've beaten EVERY GT I ever came across from when I was stock, to when I threw on MODs. 5.0's, Terminator's & Mach1's are what I'm going for from now on...

[stanger88]

I have owned a couple of GT's, they are ok. I think that they are not in the same class as an LS1 or even an LT1, 2004 and older that is. The new GT is pretty fast. And can hang with a LS1, not win, just keep up.

The GT's are alot cheaper than the LS1's. Even back in the LT1 days the GT was still alot cheaper. You get what you pay for. A GT loses its resale value alot faster than the Z28 or TA's ever did.

In the late 80's the shoe was on the other foot, the 5.0 GT's were beating the 5.0 and 5.7 Z28's or TA's. The 87 5.0 had 225 horse, but 300 foot pounds of torque. They ruled the streets and everybody wanted a 5.0. The 5.0's were more powerful and they weighed less than the F bods.

It switched in 1993 with the LT1. And ironically in 1993 the GT was de tuned to 205 horsepower. A 1993 GT will lose to a 1992 by alot. So when the LT1 went to 275 horse, the GT dropped way down, as a matter of fact the GT took untill 1999 just to get to 260 horse. By then the LS1's were rated at 305 but actually did 350 horse. So of course a 93-02 F body will wax a 93-04 GT. Its as simple as horsepower numbers.

I raced a guy in a 95 GT with a 100 shot of NOS and alot of other crap, and I had exhaust, knn, lid, tune, and I beat him by a car length in my 1999 LS1, we raced 3 times, He was pissed.

So no, it doesnt matter the money you spend on mods, it matters what you start with. But in the GT's defense, they are cheaper, so they sell alot more cars to people.

I know the new Maro will be faster then the new GT coming out, but price wise, the GT will sell more. They always do.

LMAO, no. There was no "detune" Ford had made revisions starting in 1987 to the 5.0 that each year lessened hp (supposedly) and then in 93 the rating changed. 93 5.0's turn the same times as 87 5.0's normally. They also dyno the same. Do you think that 'vettes lay more down than F-bods too? lol

[preston1980]

LMAO, no. There was no "detune" Ford had made revisions starting in 1987 to the 5.0 that each year lessened hp (supposedly) and then in 93 the rating changed. 93 5.0's turn the same times as 87 5.0's normally. They also dyno the same. Do you think that 'vettes lay more down than F-bods too? lol

Yes the 97-2000 LS1 vetted was tuned more agressivly than the 98-00 LS1 maros and TA's. A Vette will dyno higher those years than the F-bods.

And in 1987 the 5.0 recieved the E7 heads and a better intake, this increased horsepower to 225 and the torque to 300, in 89 the 5.0 went to a mass air meter instead of speed density. This lowered the horsepower a little, but they didnt officially change the rating. The mass air made the car except mods better, like a cam or headers, by adjusting the air fuel ratio. Anyway, the engine and horsepower stayed the same from 1990 through 1992. In 1993 the 5.0 went to a new cast hypereutectic piston, and Ford released the horsepower rating at 205, with only 275 torque.
LOL, wow Im cool. You dont think that just because the 87-95 had the 5.0, that they were all the exact same horspower, do you? LOL


Here are some quarter mile times before and after the de-tune(or whatever you want to call it) in 1993:

1991 Ford Mustang GT: 7.3 sec. 0-60 mph, quarter mile= 15.6 sec.
1993 Ford Mustang GT: 7.9 sec. 0-60 mph, quarter mile= 15.9 sec.

See the differance????????????????????????????? And yes they did dyno differant too.

[96z28]

who cares if you piss off them ford guys!! aint that right ford guys and gals

[preston1980]

who cares if you piss off them ford guys!! aint that right ford guys and gals

Thats right, who cares? Id rather be pissed off than pissed on.

[Danger731]

Lol he raced a 2003 GT a 2007 GT is a bit different lol, if his car is S/C you better be too. Or have atleast cam work done.

spray

[2000T/A Guru]

Eh, never liked spray on american muscle unless of course you have everything else done too lol.