Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 41
  1. #21
    King 0f n00bz shady milkman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Shepherd, Michigan
    Age
    37
    Posts
    11,770

    blacker than wesleysnipes
    98' trans am

    Quote Originally Posted by rel3rd View Post
    Having been there and done it, I'd have to disagree with both statements. Throwing more horsepower at something naturally puts more stress on everything. More load and stress = less reliable, no matter how perfect it runs. If it was "very very easy" then there'd be a whole lot more cars that could do it. There's tons of people who worry about how high it dyno's, but can't run a number anywhere near impressive at the track. LUCK has a good bit to do with it also IMHO. I've whooped up on cars with 100+ more dyno proven horsepower, and know at least one guy who ran quicker than me with less horsepower. (My 3755# SS made 344rwhp yet ran a best of 11.61@116).


    .
    dyno numbers dont mean shit...a high peaking set up will never run as well as a broad curve with tons of power underneath the curve...that is why i laugh when i see people go off of peak numbers and expect to beat every car with less power....people over-cam their cars 80% of the time if not more..they go for big duration ..instead of really paying attention to EVO,EVC,IVO,IVC....dyno numbers mean nothing...ETs mean everything

  2. #22
    Member rel3rd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Baltimore, MD.
    Posts
    733

    Bright Red
    2000 Pontiac Trans Am WS6

    Thumbs up

    Quote Originally Posted by shady milkman View Post
    dyno numbers dont mean shit...a high peaking set up will never run as well as a broad curve with tons of power underneath the curve...that is why i laugh when i see people go off of peak numbers and expect to beat every car with less power....people over-cam their cars 80% of the time if not more..they go for big duration ..instead of really paying attention to EVO,EVC,IVO,IVC....dyno numbers mean nothing...ETs mean everything
    EXACTLY!!!

  3. #23
    King 0f n00bz shady milkman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Shepherd, Michigan
    Age
    37
    Posts
    11,770

    blacker than wesleysnipes
    98' trans am

    Quote Originally Posted by rel3rd View Post
    EXACTLY!!!
    after doing a lot of research the cam i will be getting will look rather small on paper..but its a torque bish with alot of power under the curve, with a shit ton of low end/mid and a decent high end... and it will love my 3600 stall i am getting and the AFR 215 heads i hope to surprise a few folks

  4. #24
    used and abused at wot ibanez7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Crystal Lake IL
    Age
    49
    Posts
    2,517

    Pewter
    2001 Camaro Z28 M6

    how much hp you make per rpm will always dominate peak hp.

    This is why the new ls3, ls7 and ls9 are great engines, they make a more power per rpm then our ls1 engines did.

  5. #25
    Slow'er'Ass Mr. Luos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Thornton, CO
    Posts
    23,773

    Red Tint Jewelcoat
    2008 Trailblazer SS

    Been running over 500RWHP without much issue for over 4 years now.
    Granted, that is only 11K miles on that motor.

  6. #26
    King 0f n00bz shady milkman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Shepherd, Michigan
    Age
    37
    Posts
    11,770

    blacker than wesleysnipes
    98' trans am

    Quote Originally Posted by ibanez7 View Post
    how much hp you make per rpm will always dominate peak hp.

    This is why the new ls3, ls7 and ls9 are great engines, they make a more power per rpm then our ls1 engines did.
    not to mention..basically at idle the ls9 makes what the ls1 did at peak for torque

  7. #27
    Veteran 0rion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    ohio
    Posts
    22,554

    98 Formula
    06 duramax

    cheap.....fast....reliable


    Pick 2.

  8. #28
    I don't sell out! blackSS01's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    5,558

    Black
    2001 Camaro SS M6

    Quote Originally Posted by rel3rd View Post
    Having been there and done it, I'd have to disagree with both statements. Throwing more horsepower at something naturally puts more stress on everything. More load and stress = less reliable, no matter how perfect it runs. If it was "very very easy" then there'd be a whole lot more cars that could do it. There's tons of people who worry about how high it dyno's, but can't run a number anywhere near impressive at the track. LUCK has a good bit to do with it also IMHO. I've whooped up on cars with 100+ more dyno proven horsepower, and know at least one guy who ran quicker than me with less horsepower. (My 3755# SS made 344rwhp yet ran a best of 11.61@116).

    As far as cheaply being out of the question...that's definitely a matter of opinion as to what exactly is expensive and what's cheap? With a house payment and 3 kids, I have to shop around for my mods, and it easily saves me a ton of cash.

    I started with a bone stock 2000 SS that had 110,000 miles on it. ($8000)
    Did all the common A4 street/strip mods...free ramair, lid ($100), used catback ($200), used ory w/used longtubes ($200 for both), drag radials ($320), and a used Vigilante 3600 stall ($450), and a basic tune for $400. The car went 12.66@107 in the heat and humidity of the Summer.
    I bought a used cam ($200), new 918 springs, pushrods, and gaskets ($300 or so), and also bought my own used copy of HPTuners ($200). The car went 11.75@114 the first time back to the track and soon after some tweaking to the tune, went 11.60's@115 all day long, best of 11.61@116. It'd go 11.80's in the middle of the Summer. With heavy TT2's (instead of ProStars) at all 4 corners it ran 12.0's all day long. There was no high dollar suspension work, no fancy high dollar transmission or rear, and the car could be driven anywhere/anytime, by anybody, yet still yanked the front wheels at every launch. Gotta love that.

    Even if everything was bought new, it still was a nice dollar to horsepower ratio IMO. Especially when you look around at all the higher budgeted 400+ horsepower cars that can't get out of the 12's.




    Not sure where you have gotten this info, but it just isn't true. If properly broken in, valvesprings are designed to last 100,000 miles +. Obviously, a higher lift cam is harder on them than a stock cam would be, but the reality of it is that you do not zing the engine to redline more than you just cruise around. Revving to 6500 every time you take off from a red light would surely wear out springs quicker than if you didn't, but even then it isn't as dramatic as you seem to think. FWIW, I beat the crap out of my car everytime I drove it (it was a toy). I made well over 150 passes on it over two Summers. And my old 918 springs still let the car rev easily to it's 6800 rpm redline anytime it wanted to.



    .

    .
    Have to respectively disagree with a few things. Cheap and Cheaper are two different things. You did it cheaper then it would have been before shopping around but you didn't do it cheap (I hope). And performance parts are built better then stock, thats why they add performance thus they should last longer if properly maintained. People have gotten into the 11's with stall/cam/couple bolt ons, that too me is easy. But hey, we all have our different opinions

  9. #29
    Member rel3rd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Baltimore, MD.
    Posts
    733

    Bright Red
    2000 Pontiac Trans Am WS6

    Thumbs up

    Quote Originally Posted by blackSS01 View Post
    People have gotten into the 11's with stall/cam/couple bolt ons, that too me is easy. But hey, we all have our different opinions
    I'm one of them, so I know it's possible.
    So, you're saying that you'll easily run mid 11's when you've gotten the cam and converter installed? Because you should. Just don't be surprised if you don't find it as easy as you think. The whole package is what makes the difference between the ones that can do it, and the ones that should do it.

    Good Luck with your setup.

  10. #30
    used and abused at wot ibanez7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Crystal Lake IL
    Age
    49
    Posts
    2,517

    Pewter
    2001 Camaro Z28 M6

    Quote Originally Posted by rel3rd View Post
    I'm one of them, so I know it's possible.
    So, you're saying that you'll easily run mid 11's when you've gotten the cam and converter installed? Because you should. Just don't be surprised if you don't find it as easy as you think. The whole package is what makes the difference between the ones that can do it, and the ones that should do it.

    Good Luck with your setup.
    so true I have seen many cars run 11s with simple basic setups. then other car owners expect to run the same or faster with similiar builds and cry when they dont even come close.

  11. #31
    Senior Member Z28Thunder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Broken Arrow, Ok
    Age
    60
    Posts
    4,542

    Arctic White
    2000 Z28

    Quote Originally Posted by JoshieDoom View Post
    11s that usually means a larger cam swap and changing out springs often..
    A .224/.228 will get you in the 11's. Heck 11's are possible without a cam. And I am not talking Nitrous. Why would you have to change springs often???

    Run mid 11's myself here. I have the same 918's since what 04. And I run .598/.595 ...
    Last edited by Z28Thunder; 06-15-2009 at 02:41 PM.

  12. #32
    Senior Member Z28Thunder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Broken Arrow, Ok
    Age
    60
    Posts
    4,542

    Arctic White
    2000 Z28

    Quote Originally Posted by blackSS01 View Post
    People have gotten into the 11's with stall/cam/couple bolt ons, that too me is easy. But hey, we all have our different opinions

    Stall/cam and gears here. And IMO while it seems and looks simple. It does take the correct setup.
    Last edited by Z28Thunder; 06-15-2009 at 02:45 PM.

  13. #33
    down in it 310stanger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    nj
    Age
    43
    Posts
    11,020

    white
    90 Mustang 5.0

    In regards to the valvesprings issue. If you are changing valvesprings at 20k, you are either buying shit springs that arent sufficifent for the cam you are using, you didnt use the right length pushrods or both. Who wants to change springs at 20k? i sure dont. Its not "hard" but its enough of a pain in the ass that you shouldnt have to. I believe that if your combo is correct, and the right parts were chosen, you can have close to stock reliability. Its the engines that were built for 1/4 mile times and have dfi and stand alone computers that have constant reliable issues.

  14. #34
    I don't sell out! blackSS01's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    5,558

    Black
    2001 Camaro SS M6

    Quote Originally Posted by rel3rd View Post
    I'm one of them, so I know it's possible.
    So, you're saying that you'll easily run mid 11's when you've gotten the cam and converter installed? Because you should. Just don't be surprised if you don't find it as easy as you think. The whole package is what makes the difference between the ones that can do it, and the ones that should do it.

    Good Luck with your setup.
    I have a M6 so I will have to work a little harder for my 11's And I didn't mean mid 11's. Just breaking into them

  15. #35
    Member rel3rd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Baltimore, MD.
    Posts
    733

    Bright Red
    2000 Pontiac Trans Am WS6

    Thumbs up

    oops, I forgot 6 speed cars need 500rwhp to run mid 11's, lol...

    j/k...good luck with your setup. I sold mine a month ago to take a little break from this nasty and sometimes expensive habit, lol.

  16. #36
    I don't sell out! blackSS01's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    5,558

    Black
    2001 Camaro SS M6

    Quote Originally Posted by rel3rd View Post
    oops, I forgot 6 speed cars need 500rwhp to run mid 11's, lol...

    j/k...good luck with your setup. I sold mine a month ago to take a little break from this nasty and sometimes expensive habit, lol.
    Yeah, its worse then crack

  17. #37
    Slow'er'Ass Mr. Luos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Thornton, CO
    Posts
    23,773

    Red Tint Jewelcoat
    2008 Trailblazer SS

    Quote Originally Posted by rel3rd View Post
    oops, I forgot 6 speed cars need 500rwhp to run mid 11's, lol...
    That's just me.

  18. #38
    Veteran Hi-Po's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    10,467

    Black
    1999 TA WS.6

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Luos View Post
    That's just me.

  19. #39
    Member jb3golf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Zona
    Posts
    600

    Red
    1998 Camaro Z28 Conv. M6

    Quote Originally Posted by shady milkman View Post
    dyno numbers dont mean shit...a high peaking set up will never run as well as a broad curve with tons of power underneath the curve...that is why i laugh when i see people go off of peak numbers and expect to beat every car with less power....people over-cam their cars 80% of the time if not more..they go for big duration ..instead of really paying attention to EVO,EVC,IVO,IVC....dyno numbers mean nothing...ETs mean everything
    +1 Milkman!!!! Well done.

  20. #40
    Impounded 86 IROC-Z's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    .
    Age
    37
    Posts
    11,676

    Everything fiberglass
    2005 Amberlamps

    Strong bump.


    And ewwwww, joshiedoom

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Reliable 500 HP
    By smbyda in forum General Help
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 06-04-2008, 07:36 AM
  2. Imports are more reliable
    By NdrSiege in forum Almost Anything Goes
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 06-29-2007, 11:52 AM
  3. how reliable are turbos
    By Oldladykiller in forum Forced Induction
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 03-08-2007, 03:12 AM
  4. How reliable is your LS1 thus far?
    By myk02k in forum General Help
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 05-19-2006, 01:49 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •