Urine Test

**86 IROC-Z** · 04-17-2007, 08:54 PM

I've always thought it was funny that I needed a drug test to clean up popcorn from theaters but I didn't need one to be a lifeguard.... doesn't make sense to me

**JonB** · 04-17-2007, 08:58 PM

Originally Posted by 86 IROC-Z

I've always thought it was funny that I needed a drug test to clean up popcorn from theaters but I didn't need one to be a lifeguard.... doesn't make sense to me

I think its pretty funny I need to pass a drug test to have a job but don't have to pass one to get free money. Fuck working i'm quiting tommorow and going on welfare I might just pick up some weed on the way to the welfare office.

**blackSS01** · 04-18-2007, 12:56 PM

Ok, I did take to the post a little wrong. I totally agree with this post, now that it has been clarified. I guess the alcohol last night didn't let me see that.

**Kjz99z28** · 04-18-2007, 01:22 PM

Haha.. alcohol will do that.

**2000T/A Guru** · 04-18-2007, 02:39 PM

I just wanna say that i work a full time job have an apartment a kid 2 cars and i have smoked weed everyday since i was 16 so i mean its all what you do with your life. I work hard and like to smoke a bowl or blunt after a long day of work.

I do agree that they shouldnt be smoking when they are jobless and need money for other things and other people who there are supposed to be caring for like there children. I used to live in a very bad part of Milwaukke my neighbor was the guy who didnt have a job and just smoked pot all day.

**minty99z** · 04-18-2007, 05:49 PM

if you have enough money to buy weed somehow, then you dont deserve to get welfare.......

**FasstChevys** · 04-19-2007, 06:39 AM

Originally Posted by blackSS01

Ok, I did take to the post a little wrong. I totally agree with this post, now that it has been clarified. I guess the alcohol last night didn't let me see that.

I have no problem with welfare recipients having to pass a drug test to get assistance. I think that's a great idea.

As far as what you've said......you did back off a little bit......but let's put it in to perspective. Would you want someone on drugs working along side you on a construction site? Or, since you are/were in the service, fighting along side you??

I think you see the point. When people get fired for failing their drug test THE SECOND TIME, they deserve to be terminated. Period. When people are hired with the understanding that there's a drug policy, they need to decide if they want to work for that company right then. Not after.

**blackSS01** · 04-19-2007, 12:58 PM

You would not believe how many people in the Military smoke, I know more people in all my life that smoke, then people that don't. And with that being said, it is not that I try to find them, you just do. I don't mind working construction (I am a plumber) or fighting by them as long as they are not high at the time, or at work. Just keep it at home were it belongs. I quit smoking, but will probably go back eventually, not because I have to, but because I want to. I personally like it, but that is my own opinion. I was a little rowdy in my other posts, but I was also intoxicated (which does not justifiy anything) which proves one of my points, with marijuana I am never that aggresive, with booze I can be (not all the time).

**FasstChevys** · 04-19-2007, 01:24 PM

Originally Posted by blackSS01

You would not believe how many people in the Military smoke, I know more people in all my life that smoke, then people that don't. And with that being said, it is not that I try to find them, you just do. I don't mind working construction (I am a plumber) or fighting by them as long as they are not high at the time, or at work. Just keep it at home were it belongs. I quit smoking, but will probably go back eventually, not because I have to, but because I want to. I personally like it, but that is my own opinion. I was a little rowdy in my other posts, but I was also intoxicated (which does not justifiy anything) which proves one of my points, with marijuana I am never that aggresive, with booze I can be (not all the time).

When you were rowdy while being intoxicated doesn't really prove any point except for the fact of how it affects you, and you only. Everyone is different and reacts to alcohol, drugs, and/or whatever in different ways.

**davidz28guy** · 04-19-2007, 01:30 PM

but how many drunk people have you seen starting a fight, now how many people that were high, exactly

**2000T/A Guru** · 04-19-2007, 01:31 PM

I think that if you are a good tax paying respectable member of society that the government should send us up standing people who smoke, free bud lol.

**FasstChevys** · 04-19-2007, 02:01 PM

Originally Posted by davidz28guy

but how many drunk people have you seen starting a fight, now how many people that were high, exactly

Right now today, which one is illegal, and which one isnt'? Exactly.

**2000T/A Guru** · 04-19-2007, 02:13 PM

Your statement about which one is legal and which isnt proves nothing. Except your dumb as fuck.

**astyles** · 04-19-2007, 02:49 PM

i'd rather work with a pot head than a drunk anyday!

**astyles** · 04-19-2007, 02:50 PM

leagality of weed is a issue of who gets paid for it and who looses money if it is leagal

**FasstChevys** · 04-19-2007, 03:20 PM

Originally Posted by 2000T/A Guru

Your statement about which one is legal and which isnt proves nothing. Except your dumb as fuck.

Now it's personal.

Fuck you, you 19 year old, snot-nosed jack ass that doesn't know shit yet. Thanks.

**my5thNewUsernameHere** · 04-19-2007, 03:27 PM

Originally Posted by JonB

Personally I think there should be none of this government assistance crap. It would come down to survival of the fittest, but thats a whole other thread we could start.

I think getting rid of government assistance all together would be a mistake. It's the abuse of it that needs to be stopped. There's a big difference between the crack smokers that sit at home on welfare and those that receive aid due to a disability or other special need (i.e. Single mother with 2 kids recently diagnosed with cancer and unable to work while being treated).

Take it to the next level: Should you also be fired from your job because your cholesterol is too high and the company doesn't want to bear your insurance risk?

http://www.businessweek.com/magazine...tm?chan=search

**2000T/A Guru** · 04-19-2007, 03:30 PM

Lol i dont shit once again another post that proves so many points saying i dont know shit like you know me once again proving nothing except your dumb as fuck. What point did your post prove that said one is legal and one isnt huh. Alchohol can actually kill you in one night of drinking pot cant, you proved nothing except your and ignorant red neck piece of shit.

**FasstChevys** · 04-19-2007, 03:31 PM

Originally Posted by my5thNewUsernameHere

I think getting rid of government assistance all together would be a mistake. It's the abuse of it that needs to be stopped. There's a big difference between the crack smokers that sit at home on welfare and those that receive aid due to a disability or other special need (i.e. Single mother with 2 kids recently diagnosed with cancer and unable to work while being treated).

Take it to the next level: Should you also be fired from your job because your cholesterol is too high and the company doesn't want to bear your insurance risk?

http://www.businessweek.com/magazine...tm?chan=search

I agree with you, getting rid of government assistance all together would be a mistake. I also believe in what the initial thread starter said. People sitting at home on their asses getting wasted (drugs or booze) don't deserve the assistance.