The BCS is a crock of shit

**Y2KPewterSS** · 12-05-2006, 01:54 PM

Originally Posted by Big D Z

Seeding wouldn't mean shit because there won't be home field advantages. The playoffs would be played at "Bowl" facilities.

So, no, every game would NOT matter. Take OU, they lost two games and have no chance to play for the title because they lost two games. In a playoff system, they would still have made it to the playoffs and have a chance to play for the title. So those two loses by OU then don't matter really.

OU's record might be 11-2 but realistically they won 12 games, that Oregon disaster should have been wiped off the books IMO

**Mr. Luos** · 12-05-2006, 01:56 PM

Originally Posted by Packy

They aren't number one in their conference and they have already lost to OSU. Easy decision...

You are going to hate me by the end of this conversation.

No, it didn't. But did you see who did? Team by the name of Ohio State. Maybe you've heard of the Buckeyes? Undefeated. Ranked first in the country. Beat Michigan in Columbus by the grand total of three whole points.

And feel free to show me in the BCS handbook where it says you've got to win your conference to play in the championship game.

**Y2KPewterSS** · 12-05-2006, 01:57 PM

Originally Posted by ADAM-00SS

Check this...

If Flordia blows OSU out and Michigan blows USC out the AP polls have the power to vote a split title between UM and Flordia. The reason is because the computer's already have Flordia and UM tied in points and I think there are more voters in the AP's than the Harris. I'm hoping that OSU wins, but I think Flordia is going to come to play just like we did in 2002. Either way it's going to be a great game. BUCKS-42 gators-24

The BCS championship has no ties to the AP championship, so yes, there can be a split. Last split was USCs first title year. USC won the AP that year and LSU won the BCS title.

**Y2KPewterSS** · 12-05-2006, 01:58 PM

Lots of teams have not won their conference and played in the BCS game.

**Mr. Luos** · 12-05-2006, 02:01 PM

Just one more....

Ask the coaches at Vanderbilt (the Commodores played both Michigan and Florida this season) who is the better team, and the consensus pick -- privately, of course -- is the Wolverines. Florida has more speed and a handful of players to die for, they say, but Michigan is more physical, would control both sides of the line of scrimmage, has wonderful wide receivers, and is led by a quarterback who doesn't make many mistakes.

Ask them who would give Ohio State the better game, and you'll get the same answer.

I am a fan of a GREAT football game. And I believe the game would have been better if we saw the rematch.

**Packy** · 12-05-2006, 02:05 PM

Should there be a tournament? I say yes to fix these types of issues. However, with the current system Florida gets the nod and deserves it in my eyes with a stonger schedule, strong road wins, and 12-1 over 11-1!!!

**Packy** · 12-05-2006, 02:07 PM

Originally Posted by Mr. Luos

You are going to hate me by the end of this conversation.

More of the reason why there should be a tourney.

**Mr. Luos** · 12-05-2006, 02:09 PM

Agreed.
I am not trying to take anything from Florida. They earned it.

But so did Michigan.
I really hope Florida can make it a game.

**Packy** · 12-05-2006, 02:10 PM

Originally Posted by Mr. Luos

Just one more....

I am a fan of a GREAT football game. And I believe the game would have been better if we saw the rematch.

I think that the Florida vs. OSU game will be better than a re-match because now you have two teams that normally don't play each other going at it! Sort of a Northern style versus Southern Style football game!

**Packy** · 12-05-2006, 02:14 PM

Originally Posted by Mr. Luos

Agreed.
I am not trying to take anything from Florida. They earned it.

But so did Michigan.
I really hope Florida can make it a game.

They will!

**Y2KPewterSS** · 12-05-2006, 02:17 PM

Originally Posted by Mr. Luos

Agreed.
I am not trying to take anything from Florida. They earned it.

But so did Michigan.
I really hope Florida can make it a game.

Both teams have earned it, thats what is being lost in all this. Stupid computers and journalists

**Nasty TA** · 12-05-2006, 05:09 PM

Originally Posted by skar

That was before the game. (Ohio vs Mich) By both coaches. I am sure Tressel
would NOT like a rematch But Carr and his team would and that's all you read about or see on TV here in MICHIGAN . Rose bowl or the national championship game. I think they would rather be playing for the championship.

I agree but this is why the BCS is so retarded. Waht are you going to do.

**tpilews** · 12-05-2006, 06:45 PM

Originally Posted by Packy

Should there be a tournament? I say yes to fix these types of issues. However, with the current system Florida gets the nod and deserves it in my eyes with a stonger schedule, strong road wins, and 12-1 over 11-1!!!

Your punishing Michigan because the big ten doesn't have a conference champ game.
Bottom line is the big ten needs a conference championship game. What kind of loop would that throw into the BCS computer system if there was and michigan beat ohio st.. Then you would have Michigan, Ohio St., and Florida all at 12-1. Who deserves it then? Get rid of the BCS please, once and for all.

**snaggeltooth** · 12-05-2006, 10:26 PM

so if OSU and Mich. had played would BCS still be a 'croc o shit " ???

**Sassy Cassie** · 12-06-2006, 12:06 AM

**Packy** · 12-06-2006, 08:54 AM

Originally Posted by tpilews

Your punishing Michigan because the big ten doesn't have a conference champ game.
Bottom line is the big ten needs a conference championship game. What kind of loop would that throw into the BCS computer system if there was and michigan beat ohio st.. Then you would have Michigan, Ohio St., and Florida all at 12-1. Who deserves it then? Get rid of the BCS please, once and for all.

I already agree that the system sucks. I just feel that Florida deserves it more than Michigan. For a lot of reasons most of which I am not going to name again. Here is another one for you though. Michigan played Ball State and barely beat them. You have to admit they have had a weaker than normal schedule this year.

If Michigan would have beat OSU then... Shoulda, coulda, woulda.

In all honesty Michigan fans quit acting butt hurt about the loss to OSU! That is really what this is all about. You guys wanna see a rematch but your not getting it!

**StangKiller615** · 12-06-2006, 08:58 AM

Originally Posted by Camaro2fast4u

What a bunch of Shit, Florida getting in over Michigan. Fuck the BCS.

Who wants to see OSU kick Michigan's ass again?? Go Gators!!

**Vols Fan** · 12-07-2006, 04:10 PM

Michigan had there shot 3 weeks ago an got beat. Yeah it was a close game in the horseshoe but didn't OSU have 4 or 5 turnovers? Michigan could have easily gotton blown out in that game. I'm not a Flordia fan but I am glad the SEC gets its shot at OSU. Earlier in this post the comment was made about Flordia losing to Auburn by 10 points you didn't watch that game did you guy? The Gators were down 3 an lost the ball on the last kickoff of the game an it was ran back for a td after a failed lateral. Teibow or Havin neither had a touch in the second half of that game that will not be the case against OSU. If you have never been to Jordan-Hare Stadium on a Saturday night for a SEC game trust me its just as hostile as the Horseshoe. Play calling an another officals bad call lost Flordia that game if not for that this would be a mute point Flordia would be undefeated.

**Ice Spiral** · 12-07-2006, 06:21 PM

The BCS is going nowhere.

The bowls and the events and preparations that go with them are far too powerful of a lobby.

**StangKiller615** · 12-08-2006, 06:54 AM

Michigan played OSU and lost, Both Florida and Michigan had one loss. Florida had a tougher schedule, this is the reason Florida will be in the National Championship game. The SEC is the best conference in college football. The SEC has been screwed out of National Championship games and Hesimen trophies. Peyton Manning was screwed out of the Hesimen trophy by Charles Woodson. Go Gators!