Results 1 to 6 of 6
Thread: lt1
-
07-23-2014, 09:35 AM #1
lt1
What's the difference between 1995 trans am and 1996 s.s camaro watch one would u rather have
-
07-23-2014, 10:06 AM #2
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Location
- Florida Man Status Acheivement
- Posts
- 11,785
Navy Blue Metallic- 98 T/A, 00 FBVert, 78T/A
Engine, trans, rear = no difference.
Main body & interior.
I've had a 96FB and regarding the interior I like the firebirds best over the Camaros of that time period (93-97). BUT I like the Camaro body style of the era more.
Your asking which is best and almost everyone here will tell you pass and get an LS1 car (98-02). I have a buddy that has 94 body with a LS1 conversion. Looks like a bang up POS but it's becoming a true sleeper.
Are you looking at buying one?
-
07-23-2014, 11:52 PM #3
The 95 will be OBD1 with a single cat exhaust setup, and be rated at 275hp. The 96 is OBD2 and will have dual cats, and be rated at 305hp. Other than that, it's all aesthetics.
Personally I'd take the SS, purely on aesthetics.
-
07-24-2014, 05:45 AM #4
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Location
- Annapolis, MD
- Posts
- 1,111
BLK/BLK w/CGM Stripes- 2010 Camaro 2SS/M6
Dual cat was rated at 285. Only WS6 with Ram air was 305, but that was 1997
I like work. It fascinates me. I can sit and look at it for hours.
My Cardomain Site My Fquick site Custom Installs
-
07-24-2014, 10:52 AM #5
-
07-24-2014, 10:53 AM #6
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Location
- Annapolis, MD
- Posts
- 1,111
BLK/BLK w/CGM Stripes- 2010 Camaro 2SS/M6
I stand corrected*
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks