Results 1 to 17 of 17
Thread: Is this a good setup for my V6?
-
01-23-2012, 10:18 AM #1
Is this a good setup for my V6?
Right now my '97 has a custom catback and intake on it, but would this make a good setup?
-Pacesetter mid length headers
-Pypes x-pipe with 2 cutouts
-chopping up the custom catback to fit with the x-pipe
-no cat or muffler.
Let me know what you guys think and give me suggestions on what you think would sound good and perform well. Thanks!
-
01-23-2012, 11:20 PM #2
Have you ever heard a 3800-II N/A without a muffler on a stock cam?
IMHO not the most pleasant sound.. They have a heavy drone that can not be overcome by rpms because by the time you crank it up to where is starts sounding good it fell on it's face 2000 rpm ago.
It's not the engines fault though, definetly a good engine, it's the stock heads/cam that kills it..
A nice set of worked stock heads, or an after market set with better than stock flow, and a lumpy cam and you'll have no trouble getting into L67 numbers without a blower.
I mean heck,, you'll need a tune to make full use of the headers/exhaust, and to turn off the cat code it will throw anyways.
IMHO headers are always a good idea, espeacially since the 3800 could definetly use a little more top end.
Just my .02Last edited by Smittro; 01-24-2012 at 04:38 AM.
Suggestion: If you are particularly irritated by another member's posting habits and are constantly fighting the urge to flame them, you can click on that person's profile, and select "Add to ignore list." This will make that person's posts invisible to you.
-
01-25-2012, 09:59 AM #3
I'll take that .02 and put it in the bank, thanks for the tips! Ive got about $900 to work with so we'll see what I can accomplish with that. It will be a couple months but I'll keep you guys posted.
-
01-25-2012, 10:29 AM #4
That's enough cash for a real good start.
The Buick guys have made sure over the years that the after market is pretty strong for the 3800's.
You can get into a new set of heads for $300-600.
A set of 1:6 rockers for less than that iirc and you'll be well on your way..
-
01-30-2012, 08:09 AM #5
When you put your setup on, post up a vid for us to hear
-
02-01-2012, 06:52 PM #6
I think he is an LT1 V8 and not a V6......
-
02-01-2012, 09:37 PM #7
-
02-02-2012, 12:54 PM #8
If you are getting headers, possibly go true dual. Ive heard some true duals on 3800, and it sounds pretty damm mean.
Goodluck on the setup though.
-
02-03-2012, 06:28 AM #9
-
02-03-2012, 09:35 AM #10
Are you sure?
The L36 stockers are kinda a weak link in the valve train, the L36 also does'nt have compression reducing pistons as the L67 does.
I have'nt done the math but I am not sure 1:8's will work with L36 pistons due to having less clearance.
Also many folks upgrade to 1:6 rockers from the L36 stockers..
I'd have to pull tha manuals to see the actual L36 stock rocker ratios, I'll have a look when I get to the shop later.
-
02-03-2012, 11:22 AM #11
I thought you had an LT1 though? What happened to it?
-
02-03-2012, 01:59 PM #12
-
02-03-2012, 02:38 PM #13
Results from 2 seperate manuals
1996-1999 F-body L36 3800 series 2 N/A rocker ratio is ~1.315
On 96 -99' 3800 a 1.6 is about as far, (MAX) as I would go because of the greater spring length than the pre 1999, 3800 F-body..
1999-2000, (or one model year) they were 1.72 this is where the 1:8 ratios come in..
There was also a change in valve spring height in 2000, with the springs being changed from 1.981 to 1.960 inches.
2001 to 2002 F body 3800-II saw anything from 1.690 to 1.750. (sloppy final builds of an aging/dieing platform) but still a stout design for sure.
With that said,, it's safe to say a set of 1:8 rockers on the N/A 3800 would see slight gains over stock in those years.
On a 1996-98 3800-2,, I would be worried about running a 1:8 ratio rocker because as stated above there was a spring change which there also shows a valve length difference..
Personally/Seperately,
It was'nt until the return of the 60*v6 or "X" type (LQ1 reborn ) that Camaro v6 gained a more precise and far more powerful v6 engine..
That's where I would head the car personally.. I can't for the life of me figure out why the LQ1 was'nt even an option for the v6 F-body.
LQ1 was cranking 3800 series 1 sc, numbers N/A with smaller displacement and a wider power curve..
Everyone says, the 3800 has more torque and they are right...~5 ft-lbs more..lol
Only thing I could come up with was if for nothing else maintanance reasons..
Taking care of a 3800 is night and day different than taking care of an LQ1..
Sorry I ramble sometimes..Last edited by Smittro; 02-03-2012 at 02:43 PM.
-
02-03-2012, 07:39 PM #14
-
02-04-2012, 06:32 AM #15
I have to say the couple I've been into did'nt look any different to me either, but I did'nt think about measuring them either cause I was'nt messing with the valve train.
I also agree about the manuals, sometimes they are off, or leave out info..
The plastic intake 3800's are all prone to leaks, and many F-body 3800's have had the leak too includeing me..
Both the LQ1 and the 3800 use the same type and material LM gaskets.
If anything the problem is in the factory gasket materials and Dexcool imho..Last edited by Smittro; 02-04-2012 at 06:35 AM.
-
02-04-2012, 08:10 AM #16
Blew it twice? Damm that really sucks. Shit i blew my engine twice. 1st time cracked the long block, 2nd time spund a bearing. If the 3rd time ever pulls around its not longer worth it.
-
02-06-2012, 08:49 PM #17
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Good Setup?
By Sarge91 in forum External EngineReplies: 1Last Post: 10-13-2008, 06:42 AM -
Is this a good setup?
By JwMonE99 in forum Camaro / SSReplies: 9Last Post: 08-11-2007, 04:05 PM -
New car.. Is this a good setup?
By SteelmanLS1 in forum Camaro / SSReplies: 18Last Post: 04-17-2007, 06:42 AM -
Good Cam For Setup
By B.A.N.A.T.A. in forum Internal EngineReplies: 0Last Post: 09-10-2006, 11:48 PM
Bookmarks