Now this is Seriously bad!!!

[joerockhead]

Say it is not so!

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070323/..._maplesyrup_dc

UDLOW, Vermont (Reuters) - In the seasonal rhythm of New England, March marks the start of sugar season, when farmers tap thawing maple trees for their sap. But some worry that a warming climate is endangering their future.


Long skeptical of claims that the planet is warming as a result of human activity -- the release of greenhouse gases through the burning of fossil fuels -- syrup-maker Doug Rose said he's started to wonder.

"I've always been, 'Oh, global warming, I don't know about that.' But now I do think we need to start thinking about it, because we are seeing changes," Rose said in an interview at Green Mountain Sugar House in Ludlow, a rustic Vermont town settled in 1761.

"We're seeing production go down, we really are."

His concerns, shared by several syrup-makers around the state, were piqued by a study by the Proctor Maple Research Center at the University of Vermont, which showed that the month-long season has gotten about three days shorter over the past four decades.

"What we're seeing is about a 10 percent reduction in the season," said Timothy Perkins, the center's director.

If that trend continues, it could mean that one day sugaring -- the process of boiling the sap down to sweet, aromatic, amber maple syrup -- would no longer be economically feasible in the region.

Perkins is currently working on a study on how climate change could change maple production in the region over the next half-century.

"You don't need to get to the point where you have zero (sap production) before people stop making maple syrup," Perkins said. "They're going to stop doing it when the economics of it no longer work."

Vermont last year was the largest producer of maple syrup in the United States, supplying 32 percent of the country's 1.4 million gallon (5.3 million liter) total output, according to Agriculture Department data. In 2005, the most recent year for which data is available, U.S. farmers produced $37.1 million worth of maple syrup.

MODERNIZATION OF MAPLE

The traditional way of making maple syrup was labor-intensive. Farmers bored holes about 1.5 inches deep into maple trees, inserted taps, hung buckets on the side of the trees and waited for the sap to start to run. Then they would return each day to empty the buckets and carry the sap back to a "sugar house," where they boiled it down to syrup.

Sap flow is stimulated by swings in temperature. At night, when the temperature drops to around 20 degrees Fahrenheit (-6.66C), the trees suck up water from soil, which they convert into sap. During the day, as the tree warms to about 40 degrees Fahrenheit (4.44C), the sap expands and runs out the hole.

Once the temperature stops dropping below freezing overnight and the trees start to produce buds, the sap starts to taste more bitter and the syrup season ends.

While the tree's role in the process remains the same, almost everything else has changed. Today most syrup-makers use plastic tubing to collect the sap, which saves daily trips to each tree.

But there's still a lot of work to be done, and for most the year starts with long days on snowshoes, drilling holes into their trees and checking the tubing. Once the sap begins to run, they work late into the night boiling it, since the faster it's made into syrup, the better it looks and tastes.

Using the tubing allows Rose and his wife, Ann, to gather sap from about 10,000 taps, enough to make up to 5,000 gallons (18,927.1 liters) of syrup a year, far more than they could manage with buckets.

The sap starts out as mostly water, with about 2 percent sugar content. To reduce it down to the 66.9 percent sugar content required for it to be called maple syrup, some modern syrup makers first run the sap through a reverse-osmosis machine that reduces its water content and then boil it.

"Because energy is so expensive now, we try to bump it up to 12 to 14 percent (sugar) before we start to boil," said Rose. Before that machine, it took about 4 gallons (15.1 liters) of oil to produce 1 gallon (3.8 liters) of maple syrup. Now it takes about 1.5 gallons (5.7 liters) of oil, he said.

Not all New England syrup makers have entirely switched over to the modern technology.

Lawrence Howrigan, who has 15,000 taps at his H.J. Howrigan & Sons farm in Fairfield, Vermont, said he still uses buckets for some of his production, keeping four teams of horses to help him haul the sap around.

"I hate to think it's all nostalgia, but, I don't know," Howrigan said. "We kind of like having a few horses around and that gives us a reason to have them, I guess."

Still, with the region warming and the season shortening, most large-scale syrup makers say they have modernize as much to keep production high and not over-tax their trees.

"We all see that the climate is changing, global warming, we all see that that is happening," said Cecile Branon, whose Branon Family Maple Orchards in Fairfield, Vermont, has 50,000 taps and produces about 14,000 gallons (52,995.8 liters) of maple syrup a year. "We worry and that's why we're real careful how we tap."

[Dax]

That was worth a read. Usually I'd assume global warming would be better for ag than not, but this seems to be an exception.

[joerockhead]

My pancakes are gonna cost me a fortune!!!!

[310stanger]

That really sucks because theres nothing like real maple syrup. When you have the real vermont or canadian stuff you cant eat pancakes with the fake shit. Theres no comparison.

[eddierox]

Here's an example of a positive attribute of Global Warming.

You can tap your maple syrup nice and warm straight from the tree.

[Crimson Sin]

Sadly no, it takes over a gallon of sap boiled down slowly to produce a pint of syrup. Your pancakes would float away on a sea of sap and would still taste like piss.

[INMY01TA]

Jeez, not more global warming bs again.

[myk02k]

Jeez, not more global warming bs again.

Yea man. First they whine about the carcinogens in cigarettes, then they nag about lead used in gas, later they bitch about the asbestos used in walls, and now they're complaining about the carbon dioxide in the atomosphere! It's all a bunch of hooplah to put promote terrorism.