i read on a magazine and looked on here that the new v6 camaro is suppost to have a 3.6L vtec 260hp engine....but its an american muscle car? so that means the ricers will be going after these now?
Printable View
i read on a magazine and looked on here that the new v6 camaro is suppost to have a 3.6L vtec 260hp engine....but its an american muscle car? so that means the ricers will be going after these now?
Fucking sweet!
VTAC!
:wwf:Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Luos
its the same motor in the new cts and it 296hp, and its the same family of motors that have been in gm cars since 2004 and from what I've found digging around the old internet its produced in North America and Australia.Quote:
Originally Posted by jd1666
http://www.media.gm.com/us/powertrai...2008/08car.htmQuote:
Originally Posted by colesherman86
its the LLT motor
yea but where was it originaly produced? its a v6 so it doesnt really matter to me its still a japanese motor in a muscle car defeats the purpose to me for a camaro/firebird
who cares if it's a good engine. That's like saying that the duramax diesel is a POS because it was designed by Isuzu.
thats why its a base car, all the posers that just want a camaro will buy the v6 model just like all the v6 stangs that are EVERYWHERE, from what I understand the 2 v8 options will be a A6 with just under 400hp and a M6 with about 420hp, so let the 16 year old girls get the v6 model and bolster the sales figures while the real camaro fans buy the v8 modles and continue to beat ricers assesQuote:
Originally Posted by jd1666
i understand but it defeats the purpose of still a muscle car to me didnt say the engine was badQuote:
Originally Posted by bluefields88
Then don't buy one. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by jd1666
New Camaro is pretty ugly anyways.
great point sirQuote:
Originally Posted by bluefields88
its not really a muscle car is a base car, just like the orig. strait 6 camaros were in the 60's, if you wanted a v8 you had to order one that wayQuote:
Originally Posted by jd1666
im not id get the z28 coupe or convertible they look pretty good the concepts look uglyQuote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Luos
good point, I don't consider any v6 cars to be muscle cars in any way. I just think, "oh, a v6, sucks that they don't have the v8". unless it's a grand national, then I'm like, "sweet, a grand national." turbo v6's can be cool.Quote:
Originally Posted by colesherman86
haha my v6 firebird beats lts1 like there standing still if there stock im getting a supercharger pretty soon hopefully around 450-500hp size of the motor doesnt matter its what you do with the engineQuote:
Originally Posted by bluefields88
a modded car beating a stock car......holy shit ..that's uncomprehendable :chuckles:Quote:
Originally Posted by jd1666
still, there's no replacement for displacement (said on this site once every 0.0032 seconds :yup:)....what do you have done to your v6? And what is this "lts1" you speak of...some kind of imbreeding? Did the LS1 finally get tired of all the nagging and just stick it in the LT1's tailpipe?Quote:
Originally Posted by jd1666
:blowme: lolQuote:
Originally Posted by shady milkman
hey i made with what i had when i got it lol but atleast i can say i did the work to make it that fast instead of just buying a modded car from some1 elses work
true.Quote:
Originally Posted by jd1666
it has all of the torque of the lt1 and the hp of the ls1..............wait...the ls1 already has all of that ...i guess it would be a iron block ls1 :shrug:Quote:
Originally Posted by Mustang=Breakfast