Retards wreck a mustang

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

10-20-2009, 01:03 PM
GoldenFlame

I dunno, I test drove a 97 LT1 M6, a 97 LT1 A4, and my 99 LS1 A4 at the ripe age of 19 by myself, just had to prove insurance... I actually remember my buddy test drove a 2001 LS1 Trans-Am a while ago (3 of us total, (18, 17 and 17)) and they let us go by ourselves, the oldest was driving, just needed proof of insurance.
10-20-2009, 03:44 PM
cammed goat

Looks like someone tossed some C4 in there and remote-detonated it. :eek2:
10-20-2009, 03:52 PM
SeVeReDiStOrTiOn

They're better off...who wants to buy a 2010 4.6 when the 4v 5.0 is supposed to come out in 2011.
10-20-2009, 05:20 PM
ls1camino

Quote:

Originally Posted by SeVeReDiStOrTiOn

They're better off...who wants to buy a 2010 4.6 when the 4v 5.0 is supposed to come out in 2011.

:haha:

True.
10-20-2009, 09:01 PM
zmg00camaross

Quote:

Originally Posted by SeVeReDiStOrTiOn

They're better off...who wants to buy a 2010 4.6 when the 4v 5.0 is supposed to come out in 2011.

o yea no doubt
10-20-2009, 09:31 PM
0verkill

but its still a rustang
10-20-2009, 10:42 PM
bluefields88

Quote:

Originally Posted by SeVeReDiStOrTiOn

They're better off...who wants to buy a 2010 4.6 when the 4v 5.0 is supposed to come out in 2011.

seriously, took them long enough to get a better engine in there.
10-21-2009, 07:48 AM
SMWS6TA

Quote:

Originally Posted by SeVeReDiStOrTiOn

They're better off...who wants to buy a 2010 4.6 when the 4v 5.0 is supposed to come out in 2011.

Ohh Great, now I going to start hear :blah: about how the 2011 Buttstang will kick my car's ass and how much power it will have.

Just when I get all the dumbass around here to shut up about the GT's, Ford put's out one that will try to give the 5th Gen Camaro a run for it's money.

I know no matter how fast I build mine up there is always someone faster. I guess it's time I start doing research into a Stroker and saving up $$ for it.

It's funny I really don't hate the Buttstang as much as I hate the owners. It's their ego!!
10-21-2009, 07:57 AM
transamprincess98

Working in the auto body business and looking at that pic I wouldn't say it held up that well. Had those kids still been in the car they would have serious injuries.
10-21-2009, 08:16 AM
GTP231

Quote:

Originally Posted by ls1camino

Salesman is either stupid or an (ex)friend :lol:

100mph isn't that much...I do that on a daily basis in my GTP, not to mention my Trans Am. I don't understand why people get all scared over that speed.

Hey you gotta do what ya gotta do on the Parkway :lol:

Wasn't this posted like 6 months ago?
10-21-2009, 01:08 PM
SHines-IT

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoldenFlame

I dunno, I test drove a 97 LT1 M6, a 97 LT1 A4, and my 99 LS1 A4 at the ripe age of 19 by myself, just had to prove insurance... I actually remember my buddy test drove a 2001 LS1 Trans-Am a while ago (3 of us total, (18, 17 and 17)) and they let us go by ourselves, the oldest was driving, just needed proof of insurance.

Exactly, I was 18 and test drove the Trans Am by my self... They really don't care, just depends on how much the car worth's. I did not need to prove insurance though... Put it this way, never got to test drive a car over $10,000 by my self, with out proving that I either have the cash or financing arranged.
10-21-2009, 05:40 PM
310stanger

Quote:

Originally Posted by ls1camino

Salesman is either stupid or an (ex)friend :lol:

100mph isn't that much...I do that on a daily basis in my GTP, not to mention my Trans Am. I don't understand why people get all scared over that speed.

Because you can die in a fuckin fiery wreck? Dude you feeling alright? lol
10-21-2009, 05:41 PM
86 IROC-Z

speed limits:
70 - open casket
100 - closed casket

conclusion: lawmakers are creepers who like looking at dead bodies.
10-21-2009, 05:44 PM
310stanger

Quote:

Originally Posted by transamprincess98

Working in the auto body business and looking at that pic I wouldn't say it held up that well. Had those kids still been in the car they would have serious injuries.

They likely crashed at 100 tap, "working in the bodyshop" (like we dont all know by now) j/k i keed i keed.... working in the bodyshop just how many cars do see that crashed at 100 and are there for repairs besides 0.00000000? If i'm not mistaken that car gets a 5 star rating, I guess Ford should go back to the drawing board and design the car to withstand a 100 mph front end collision as opposed to the industry 5-10 mph standard?
10-21-2009, 07:47 PM
transamprincess98

Quote:

Originally Posted by 310stanger

They likely crashed at 100 tap, "working in the bodyshop" (like we dont all know by now) j/k i keed i keed.... working in the bodyshop just how many cars do see that crashed at 100 and are there for repairs besides 0.00000000? If i'm not mistaken that car gets a 5 star rating, I guess Ford should go back to the drawing board and design the car to withstand a 100 mph front end collision as opposed to the industry 5-10 mph standard?

I have seen plenty 100mph crashes. Didn't say they were getting repaired. I have seen cars take a much better hit considering passengers not getting injured and in tact cabin at that speed.

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page