and it's not an ls1 either
http://www.southeasttexas.com/autos/....cfm?id=325365
Printable View
and it's not an ls1 either
http://www.southeasttexas.com/autos/....cfm?id=325365
That looks legit. I can tell because I've driven quite a few 260 mph third gens in my time.
wow
I kind of want to troll the shit out of this guy.
"drove like normal car Racing chip Handles like Cadillac until punched and racing chip kicks in"
Uhhh, I don't buy. 260mph yeah right.
Becarefull his posting chip with kick in!!Quote:
Originally Posted by 86 IROC-Z
"When this baby hits 88 mph you're gonna see some serious shit!":suicide:
I know it has been posted but this is more legit..
http://www.autoblog.com/2008/12/22/e...pontiac-trans/
DISGUSTING!!! :thumbup:Quote:
Originally Posted by imprtkillr2810
LOL read this reply..
9Ray
5:19PM (12/29/2008)
...not much Bobby, Firebirds are ALWAYS tougher and more powerful than Camaros--I've owned 6 of them from the SOHC 6 on up, dream on!
You guys see anything wrong here?
:thinking:Quote:
Originally Posted by Smittro
yup there's no such motor in an f-body.lol only OHV's..Quote:
Originally Posted by cammed goat
:rotfl:Quote:
Originally Posted by Smittro
And they say that 3rd gens are all slow. :D
Yeah there was, ohc inline six was available in first gens
too legit to quit.
200+ mph if pushed out of a plane at 50k feet.
Me thinks his speedo is fucked up!!!
:loser:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=krEp5grhYlk
this one went 276 but shoot deployed early ..
Well damn, I forgot about that motor. Did'nt think it was availible in f-bodies but I was wrong. Here you go..I stand corrected.:Pow:Quote:
Originally Posted by wheeliE-maxx
http://firstgenfirebird.org/firebird/1968/history.html
I believe it because you'd have to be going that fast to suck that much dirt and leaves and crap under the hood like that.Quote:
Originally Posted by bandit95