Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 23
  1. #1
    LSX whore allbaugh_04's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Omaha, NE
    Age
    38
    Posts
    5,894

    Pewter
    2000 Z28 Camaro

    My dyno numbers.

    Basically my mods are, SS400, full exhaust, LS6 intake, and a 230/230.

    I put down 336rwhp with cutout opened and 328rwhp with cut out closed.

    I forget the TQ numbers off hand, but they were just a tich lower like 318.


    It was tuned on a Mustang dyno. Any idea what this converts to? 390ish on dynojet? 500 crank hp?

  2. #2
    BANGIN GEARS>STAB N STEER BLK2KSS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Jacksonville FL
    Age
    41
    Posts
    855

    TRIPLE BLACK
    2000 CAMARO SS M6 #2100

    are you being serious with those dynojet and crank numbers?

  3. #3
    LSX whore allbaugh_04's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Omaha, NE
    Age
    38
    Posts
    5,894

    Pewter
    2000 Z28 Camaro

    Yep, the guy that owns the shop has a turbo 2V and puts down very low 400s and runs 10s.

    It's a conservative dyno.

    Everyone i talk to doesn't seem to know the conversion numbers cuz there really isn't any exact numbers or percentage. It depends on the tuner, if he wants to impress you or not.

    All I know is that I'll be in the 11s.
    Last edited by allbaugh_04; 05-17-2010 at 11:25 AM.

  4. #4
    King 0f n00bz shady milkman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Shepherd, Michigan
    Age
    36
    Posts
    11,770

    blacker than wesleysnipes
    98' trans am

    there is no way you are pushing anywhere close to 500 crank tho allbaugh
    mods- suncoast creations hood with functional lt1 style airbox, ls6 intake, QTP longtube headers, QTP ORY, UMI SFC, Adj. LCA with relo brackets, UMI adj. panhard bar, Koni SA and strano springs,Torq Thrust M 17s 9.5 and 10.5 with nitto 555Rs, tuned by Frost
    Quote Originally Posted by Modulistic View Post
    sometimes you get owned, sometimes you own.

  5. #5
    BANGIN GEARS>STAB N STEER BLK2KSS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Jacksonville FL
    Age
    41
    Posts
    855

    TRIPLE BLACK
    2000 CAMARO SS M6 #2100

    Ok, I still think that 54hp difference is a lot and 500 crank hp is pretty high as well. If those were the case then those mustang dyno numbers are waaaayyyyyy wrong, lol. They seemed pretty low when I first read this. This is what I hate about dyno numbers, there needs to be a set type and calibration equation so there are not huge differences like this would be. Makes no sense to me, there should not be a 54hp difference between a mustang and dynojet.

  6. #6
    King 0f n00bz shady milkman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Shepherd, Michigan
    Age
    36
    Posts
    11,770

    blacker than wesleysnipes
    98' trans am

    Quote Originally Posted by allbaugh_04 View Post
    Basically my mods are, SS400, full exhaust, LS6 intake, and a 230/230.

    I put down 336rwhp with cutout opened and 328rwhp with cut out closed.

    I forget the TQ numbers off hand, but they were just a tich lower like 318.


    It was tuned on a Mustang dyno. Any idea what this converts to? 390ish on dynojet? 500 crank hp?
    with 500 crank you would be putting down 420ish to the floor or for shits and giggles with a 20% loss you would be putting down 400 to the floor

    they say there is up to a 13% difference between the md and dj ...however the md is considered to be more of a true reading
    Last edited by shady milkman; 05-17-2010 at 11:37 AM.

  7. #7
    LSX whore allbaugh_04's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Omaha, NE
    Age
    38
    Posts
    5,894

    Pewter
    2000 Z28 Camaro

    Hmm IC.

    Another guy I know has similar mods to me, even a 230/230 cam, but higher LSA and lower lift. Not sure if he has headers yet though.

    He made 320rwhp.

    I thought it was cool to see the cutout actually did add HP.

    Before the cam and cutout I made 334/340 on a dynojet.

  8. #8
    Veteran Hi-Po's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    10,467

    Black
    1999 TA WS.6

    Screw the numbers Tim. Run that thing at the track and let the auto/4000 eat!

    If it run's 13.3 then your numbers you have might mean something

  9. #9
    LSX whore allbaugh_04's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Omaha, NE
    Age
    38
    Posts
    5,894

    Pewter
    2000 Z28 Camaro

    Only thing I've ridden in that pulls harder is Clint195's cammed Z06.

    A friend of mine has a Viper that puts down 440rwhp I think. He wants to race this week.

    Still haven't made it to the track, supposed to get a call tomorrow about a job though.

  10. #10
    King 0f n00bz shady milkman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Shepherd, Michigan
    Age
    36
    Posts
    11,770

    blacker than wesleysnipes
    98' trans am

    Quote Originally Posted by Hi-Po View Post
    Screw the numbers Tim. Run that thing at the track and let the auto/4000 eat!

    If it run's 13.3 then your numbers you have might mean something
    yup

  11. #11
    Junior Member need4fun2469's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Mesquite,Tx
    Posts
    69

    SOM
    2002 WS6

    numbers seem a little low,imo

  12. #12
    Member natews6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    173
    1999 WS6(sold) 2003 Cobra

    Money well spent on the cutouts

  13. #13
    408 ci + 4000 stall = fun lancesT/A's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Abilene Texas
    Age
    40
    Posts
    345

    red
    2002 SS

    numbers arent low for a mustang dyno id say on a dynojet you would prolly make 350-370 but like hi po said those numbers dont matter its ET that matters. with numbers you also gotta take into account that your a stalled auto which will decrease your numbers but increase your performance. on a dynojet mine made 564rwhp but on a more accurate MD it made 501rwhp the only reason i even got it done on both is bc i was unhappy with the tune by the guy that used the dyno jet so i went to another shop which used a MD

  14. #14
    NY Representative basballny2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    NeW YoRk
    Posts
    3,394

    Red
    2001 ws6

    ehhh.....maybe a LITTLE low, but with an a4 its not too bad. if it was an m6 putting that down id say something was wrong

  15. #15
    Veteran 35th-ANV-SS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Wherever life takes me
    Posts
    12,526

    Red
    02 35th LE Camaro SS

    I put down 330rwhp and 342rwtq on a MD with LTs, Exhaust, and a lid through a 9" and run low 13's with a decent 60' time for using Nitto's of 1.906.

    I'd guess if I were to drive my M6 perfect, I MIGHT be able to achieve 12.7/12.8. That's getting my launch down to 1.8X.

    Good luck Tim.

  16. #16
    LSX whore allbaugh_04's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Omaha, NE
    Age
    38
    Posts
    5,894

    Pewter
    2000 Z28 Camaro

    My roommate has the same cam and almost the same mods. He's run a 7.5 in the 1/8th and I've beaten him 3x now.

    The car is getting fixed cuz I lost 3rd and 4th gear.

    As soon as it does, I will race a Viper that has head work, lts, and other unknown mods 430hp/490tq. (dynojet)
    Last edited by allbaugh_04; 06-01-2010 at 09:24 AM.

  17. #17
    Veteran 35th-ANV-SS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Wherever life takes me
    Posts
    12,526

    Red
    02 35th LE Camaro SS

    What was your A/F readout?

  18. #18
    LSX whore allbaugh_04's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Omaha, NE
    Age
    38
    Posts
    5,894

    Pewter
    2000 Z28 Camaro

    The charts are in the car. I believe it was like 11.9-12.0, but that's just off the top of my head.

    It pulls so much better. So happy I decided to put the cam in.

  19. #19
    Veteran 35th-ANV-SS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Wherever life takes me
    Posts
    12,526

    Red
    02 35th LE Camaro SS

    13.0-13.1 is ideal so hopefully your memory is wrong

  20. #20
    LSX whore allbaugh_04's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Omaha, NE
    Age
    38
    Posts
    5,894

    Pewter
    2000 Z28 Camaro

    Quote Originally Posted by 35th-ANV-SS View Post
    13.0-13.1 is ideal so hopefully your memory is wrong
    Yea, I've read that is ideal for an N/A car.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. I want dyno numbers
    By 2K2SLPSS in forum Mid-West Members
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-13-2010, 05:41 PM
  2. LOW dyno numbers?
    By 05gtoautoX in forum GTO
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 10-27-2008, 11:34 AM
  3. Tr230 dyno numbers 98 heads=bad numbers?
    By phoenix1987 in forum Dyno Information
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 09-11-2007, 08:33 AM
  4. dyno numbers
    By imprtkillr2810 in forum Firebird / WS6
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-28-2007, 07:33 PM
  5. Cam Only Dyno Numbers!!!......236/236
    By Demonicbird00 in forum Eastern Members
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-08-2006, 08:11 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •