Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Pac 1518

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    columbus, ohio
    Posts
    90

    black
    1999 T/A

    Pac 1518

    I was wondering if any one had experience with these springs. I just picked them up and was trying to find out what a realistic lift would be.(they claim .650 max)

  2. #2
    Member side2000's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    md
    Posts
    861

    red
    2000 camaro ss

    it depends on what rpm you plan on doing with them, but generally their max is conservative so they dont have a bunch of people complaining about mangled valvetrains and grenading motors. realistically, you wont get a cam even close to .650 lift (w/ stock cubes) so dont sweat it. seem overkill though but if you got 'em use 'em.

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    columbus, ohio
    Posts
    90

    black
    1999 T/A

    Actually I had purchased the 1218 springs but they we're out of stock and i got a pretty good deal on the upgrade.

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    RI
    Posts
    165

    Mag Red
    2002 Vette

    The amount of lift they are good for will be based on how you install them. Once you measure installed height you should be able to compute distance to coil bind and from that value, with the required clearance, determine lift capability. The advertised lift really doesn't mean much.

  5. #5
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    columbus, ohio
    Posts
    90

    black
    1999 T/A

    I guess i should have said this. the 1218s are rated at .600 max lift and the 1518s are rated at .650 lift. Their the same spring just with a coating/ surface treatment. does this sound reasonable?

  6. #6
    Awaiting Activation
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    635

    SOM
    1998 T.A.

    Quote Originally Posted by vettenuts View Post
    The amount of lift they are good for will be based on how you install them. Once you measure installed height you should be able to compute distance to coil bind and from that value, with the required clearance, determine lift capability. The advertised lift really doesn't mean much.
    ^^^^^^^ Vettenuts nailed it!!! Again!!!!lol

    I like to shim until I am .060 from coil bind. This gives the best seat pressue for better valve control and better valvetrain harmonics. I have read it even gives longer spring life......
    Last edited by SOMbitch; 01-08-2009 at 01:16 PM.

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    San Antonio
    Age
    52
    Posts
    289

    Silver & Black
    99 Camaro SS

    Quote Originally Posted by SOMbitch View Post
    ^^^^^^^ Vettenuts nailed it!!! Again!!!!lol

    I like to shim until I am .060 from coil bind. This gives the best seat pressue for better valve control and better valvetrain harmonics. I have read it even gives longer spring life......
    It seems somewhat counter-intuitive but that would be true (in and to itself). I don't know a whole lot about engine internals, but springs for the most part, will last longer and perform more linearly if they are used closer to the full compressed side. (Given the same distance of travel.)

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •