Results 1 to 4 of 4
Thread: cam testing
-
01-14-2009, 04:25 AM #1
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Location
- ohio
- Posts
- 393
black- 1998 Camaro SS
cam testing
http://www.superchevy.com/technical/...en3/index.html
You guys should check out this site and see what you think. im kind of confused by reading it because everyone ive talked to on here says go bigger than a 220 because it is too mild but that site shows that the mildier cam posted bigger torque numbers than the more aggressive ones. the bigger cam put out about 10 more hp than the smaller one but not until redline. Wouldnt a cam with more torque and hp at lower rpms be best for a daily driven street car? i just wanted to know what you guys think........Thanks
-
01-18-2009, 09:17 PM #2
I just dropped a 220/224 in my goat and love it.
just remember, super big cam and a very high peak hp number make great bragging rights, but a good setup with a smaller cam can and lower peak hp number can be a lot quicker, and more friendly to drive on the street .
power under the curve is where its at
-
01-20-2009, 04:54 AM #3
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Location
- ohio
- Posts
- 393
black- 1998 Camaro SS
just curious why did you choose the 220/224 over a 220/220 or 224/224. is there an advantage buy having more duration on the exhaust side?
-
01-20-2009, 06:13 AM #4
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Testing
By mrwdjv in forum Almost Anything GoesReplies: 5Last Post: 05-11-2009, 03:11 PM -
testing
By Spikito in forum Almost Anything GoesReplies: 55Last Post: 02-21-2009, 03:56 PM -
Well testing
By 99formulals1 in forum Almost Anything GoesReplies: 8Last Post: 11-28-2008, 08:12 PM -
Testing
By Y2KPewterSS in forum Camaro / SSReplies: 0Last Post: 04-25-2007, 06:41 PM
Bookmarks