View Poll Results: K&N or Air Hog
- Voters
- 10. You may not vote on this poll
-
K&N
7 70.00% -
Air Hog
3 30.00%
Results 1 to 17 of 17
Thread: K&N or Air Hog
-
06-22-2008, 06:58 PM #1
K&N or Air Hog
Which filter do you like better.
99 Trans Am, LS1/6MT, MTI B1 cam, Lid, cat back, LS7 clutch/flywheel, Short Shifter, LT's, ORY.
-
06-22-2008, 07:29 PM #2
- Join Date
- Dec 2002
- Location
- n/w chicago
- Age
- 54
- Posts
- 6,932
black- 2000 nhra edition formula
neither. paper filers work just as well and cost alot less
2000 nhra edition formula
a few bolt ons, 379 rwhp
11.96 @113.25
-
06-22-2008, 08:16 PM #3
Neither!
I would buy a S&B or a AEM dry style cotton.
The S&B is much better in quality!Don't be afraid of the bottle!!! Be afraid of your tune!!!
-
06-22-2008, 08:22 PM #4
Gonna go ahead and second paper.
-
06-22-2008, 08:36 PM #5
Don't go with either. Both are cotton gauze oiled filters, which don't even filter as well as paper and can foul the mass air flow sensor. Paper filters well, but sucks for airflow and needs to be replaced periodically.
Your best bet is one of the new style synthetic media high flow filters, like the DryFlow made by AEM or an Amsoil filter. Both can be cleaned with soap and water, neither require oil, and both will outflow both paper and cotton gauze style filters.
My prediction is that K&N will soon switch over to the new synthetic non-oil types, since they have been having so many issues with their filter ruining perfectly good mass air sensors on a variety of vehicles.
-
06-23-2008, 03:32 AM #6
Unless you are mud bogging
IMO unless you are mud bogging or live down a gravel road use the stock filter or equivalent from any auto store. Money ahead and change every time you do the oil. No MAF issues and will flow fine unless you are putting down a sh-t pot full of HP and by then you probably have a different set-up anyway.
2000 Z28 M6, SLP Lid, SLP Bellows, SLP UD,
P&P Maf, TB By-Pass, PS Shorties, LS6 Intake, FAST 78mm TB, Hooker CB, Hurst Billet, Front Tower Brace, small 218/218....527/527....114 cam.
337rwhp/348rwtq
-
06-23-2008, 05:04 AM #7
been running K&N filter for 6 yrs and NEVER had any issues with it
-
06-23-2008, 06:29 AM #8
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- Jacksonville, FL
- Posts
- 2,723
Been using the same K&N since '01, just don't over oil it. With FTRA my filter gets dirty quickly.
-
06-23-2008, 07:40 AM #9
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Location
- LIVONIA,MICHIGAN
- Age
- 58
- Posts
- 786
PEWTER- 2000 CAMARO SS #3821
That is another reason not to use it, they do not trap as much so you are letting more get into your engine with the k/n. Sarge has talked about how the air filters affect the oil UOA's and the contamination getting thru.
-
06-23-2008, 08:00 AM #10
Used K&N's on my last 5-6 cars. no issues here. Biggest thing is to not over oil them. over-oiling is what fouls the MAF. Had the AEM on my wifes honda. Worked good too
-
06-23-2008, 04:42 PM #11
I have K&N, but I have to say, cleaning and oiling the thing is a pain in the butt. Next time I need to clean it, prolly just getting a paper filter.
-
06-24-2008, 04:27 AM #12
-
06-24-2008, 06:37 PM #13
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Location
- Chowchilla CA
- Age
- 69
- Posts
- 287
White- 2001 Z28
I dumped the K@N and went to an Amsoil Eao. My UOAs are far better in terms of grit in my motor.
-
06-24-2008, 06:51 PM #14
-
06-24-2008, 07:03 PM #15
- Join Date
- Nov 1999
- Location
- over here...
- Age
- 45
- Posts
- 25,709
[]D [] []V[] []D- 1999 trans am
i have a k&n... don't ever bother with the recharge kit... they will screw up your MAS for months!!! paper filters SUCK... when my k&n junk is dirty enough i'm swapping to something better... they flow great and all.. but when they get dirty... grrr...
-
06-24-2008, 07:38 PM #16
I have a K&N on my car, but I just bought it and I'm thinking about trashing it and getting either S&B or Amsoil Eao. Which is the best?
-
06-26-2008, 04:45 PM #17
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks