Results 1 to 8 of 8
-
11-08-2006, 07:54 AM #1
Which has better insulating properties, Ceramic or Stainless Steel?
Hi guys, I am looking at some new headers for my '01 Z28. Looking at some stainless ones on Ebay, but a little aprehesive as i will be using on the street as a dailey driver. Live in the snow belt and we use salt on roads. the corrosion resistance of stainless interest me, but I also want to keep under hood temps down. any thoughts on which is better, stainless or ceramic.
thanks.
-
11-08-2006, 08:09 AM #2
For heat the ceramic coated are way better. Stainless has no heat insulation properties that I know of. When I changed the headers on my '56 from steel (painted, not stainless) to ceramic the floor board heat went waaay down.
I think the stainless will discolor near the heads too (heat colors, blue, violet, orange, etc).
For electrical insulation, the ceramic wins too. JK.
-
11-08-2006, 12:09 PM #3
Ceramic coated and stainless are a trade-off. You could get the stainless and heat-wrap them to keep temps down. But stainless won't rust over time. Other headers will. And with living in an area with lots of moisture, I'd go stainless so they don't rust through.
-
11-08-2006, 01:33 PM #42018 CTS-V: °°668rwhp/658rwtq°°
2013 ZL1: °°590rwhp/576rwtq°°
"Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience."
-
11-08-2006, 03:34 PM #5
Stainless does retain heat better than mildsteel.
-
11-10-2006, 03:03 AM #6
- Join Date
- Nov 2006
- Location
- Indianapolis
- Age
- 61
- Posts
- 5,188
Black- 2000 WS6 6spd Hooker LT
Ceramic coated run a lot cooler that stainless. I just bought some Hooker LT ceramic for that reason. Should be getting them next week....
-
11-10-2006, 03:03 PM #7
- Join Date
- Jul 2006
- Location
- Vancouver,B.C.,Canada.W.Coast
- Posts
- 513
Navy Blue Metallic- '99 T/A WS6 M6
My underhood temp seems much cooler now with my Ceramic LT's than with my factory manifolds. I imagine it is cooler than with S/S also.
99 WS6 M6 NBM !Cags,!Cats,Vinci/Crane,Hurst,Detroit TruTrac,3:73,31 Splne,Edel.Race LT's,ORY,QTEC,Flow,ARP,Percy,MSD,SLP,AC/DELCO,Bosch,GMPP,Cntrfrce DF,Htchkiss,Susp.Tech,Lakewood,285's,Bilstein,Pro-kit,SLP,RK Sprt,A/Meter,Red Optima,Magnaflow S/S Tips,Hd Pins,Tint,Fire.Ex,[*4 Hot Rod Power Tours*]
-
11-13-2006, 07:10 AM #8
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- East Central Florida
- Posts
- 43
Silver/Black- 2002 Camaro SS Cnvt
Stainless steel has lower thermal conductivity than
mild steel or most other metals. But the real deal is
surface emissivity and surface-air transfer. SS and
black iron have high emissivity and throw heat. Here
the ceramic coatings kick ass, this is exactly what
they were engineered for. Gravel, sand and salt
with twice-daily thermal shock however, are not.
The ideal would be coated stainless. But I've got
a used set of Jet-Hots that look like they'll last
me long enough, with maybe a bit of high temp
POR-15 touchup on occasion.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Stainless 409 or Ceramic Coated?
By BADASS2000SS in forum External EngineReplies: 1Last Post: 08-24-2008, 08:15 AM -
Which insulates better, Stainless steel or Ceramic.
By Cliffy in forum External EngineReplies: 14Last Post: 11-21-2006, 07:42 PM -
Where can I buy Stainless Works Stainless steel headers?
By bene in forum External EngineReplies: 1Last Post: 07-07-2006, 01:02 PM -
Ceramic coated vs. stainless steel headers
By 99blueZ in forum External EngineReplies: 6Last Post: 05-31-2006, 10:39 AM -
ceramic or stainless headers
By GottaHaveLS1 in forum External EngineReplies: 1Last Post: 10-22-2005, 05:28 AM
Bookmarks