Results 1 to 6 of 6
Thread: AEM or K&N
-
04-25-2007, 11:21 AM #1
AEM or K&N
Is there any difference from an AEM intake from a K&N or is it just preference
-
04-25-2007, 01:43 PM #2
with everybody with a F body using K and N how could you go wrong? sticks with what works, plus that will be the last filter u ever by for that car
-
04-27-2007, 12:59 PM #3
Holley is good ( and requires no gasket )
-
04-28-2007, 10:53 AM #4
hey might be good, idont know but thats all k n really makes (actually makes) and not made from some other company then put there names on it
-
04-30-2007, 12:45 PM #5
isn't AEM for imports? i've never heard anyone havin an AEM intake on any muscle car.
1999 Trans Am M6
SLP Short Throw, Lid and CAI, Strano Springs, Koni Sport Shocks, BMR STB and SFC, UMI PHB, Pacesetter LT's and ORY, Magnaflow Catback, DMH 3" E-Cutout, LS7 Clutch, Motive 4.10, 160 T-Stat, MSD wires,, 17x9.5 Chrome C6's wrapped in Hankook 275/40/17
Tuned at Mongillo Motors in New Haven, CT - 303 RWHP and 308 RWTQ
-
04-30-2007, 12:49 PM #6
yes there is a difference. AEM is a cheap and pathetic excuse for an intake, and though k&n thinks they are better than they really are, at least their products work. i assume youre talking about a cone type intake, which is about the only type AEM makes, and they are used primarily in 4 cylinder applications. i do contend that they suck (from experience using one on an old ricer of mine). get whats proven, a lid, a good filter and cai.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks