Results 1 to 20 of 60
Thread: PCV Delete debate
-
12-24-2009, 08:01 PM #1
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Location
- Deltona, FL
- Age
- 49
- Posts
- 1,220
Sebring Silver Metalic- 2002 Camaro Z28
PCV Delete debate
I feel this won't be a short post, so crap a six pack of what ever you like now, .
OK, I thought General Info was a good place to start this thread. I decided to start my own debate thread. I didn't want to side track or hog Sarge's thread over in the GTO section, great thread BTW.
OK, so after reading Sarge's thread about the PCV system. I started following other links posted. I got to thinking. Why are there more opinions on what the right answer is for something I thought should be a just little more cut and dry. And why is it when I think of something fun to do I always find that one post somewhere that scares the crap out of me. Or at least makes me feel like I am going to blow up my engine.
The big debate. I would like to kick it off with someone listing what they feel is the Pros and Cons of running a PCV delete, and at least describe your actual delete.
I have read a post that I felt made the claim the PCV was created to extend the life of your oil and should never be deleted from a street car. So I am paraphrasing here. I have read people kick around Metered air, vacuum, throwing off A/F in the PCM, needing a tune, stinky fumes under the hood, etc.
I thought Sarge's fast explanation of why the PCV exists was pretty simple. So why the heck do some people feel your engine will die if you run your PCV to atmosphere via a breather?
And seriously, does an engine really create sulfuric acid post combustion? Dude I'm not making this crap up, just regurgitating crap I read in other places. Like I said I read other post that make it sound like you just shot your engine with a .45 if you delete you PCV.
So here are my thoughts based on nothing but me =, myself, and I with zero credibility or experience. yeah, pretty much me telling Van Gogh o how to paint, lol...
Is sulfuric acid a by product in the combustion of an engine, hmm, dunno. I would have to pull the molecular structure of the all the stuff, um, read a few fat books, um, look at the chemical reaction, make a few drunk guess, and run a Myth busters style experiment. So my first guess, no, lol.... I hope I'm not wrong, talk about egg on my face.
Does a PCV delete that vents to the world under the hood create smelly fumes you can smell from the next lane on a hot day? Well, I don't know. I would say smelly fumes, maybe, anything more than what you smell out the tail pipes, my guess know. And why does it need to be a hot day? Last time I burned myself on my engine. It still hurt the same in cold as it did in hot weather.
My setup, for now. I am using my existing LS1 PCV tubes. I still have the driver side, the passenger rear side, meeting together where the sun don't shine, up to the front stock location to a 3/8" hose. I run mine under the TB and over into the open area behind my driver headlights. I was trying to avoid hard bends, kinks, or pinches in the line. I run this into a compressor oil/water separator and then to a small breather. Right now I still have the passenger front valve cover line connected to the TB. I plan to remove this in the AM. I have my intake port capped. In the AM I plan to cap the valve cover and TB. I have a gift card for Xmas and I may buy an oil cap breather for fun, because I am crazy that way.
So that's my setup. I have driven all of like 5 miles so far. I am stock, and no tuning.
Personally I don't see the merit of some of the awful stuff I have read about metered air, vacuum leaks, sulfuric acid, short oil life cycles, etc. this is me being ignorant and kicking up a debate to see if we can iron this out before i blow up my engine or loose a fortune in oil changes.
Pros: I don't have combusted by products going back into my air via the intake. Um, is that not the only pro you really need to list.
Cons: Um, no. I personally have no way to back this up, other than me thinking out load, and waiting for Judge Wapner to start. I am waiting to hear the debate as to what the Cons are and why. Oh boy.
Can a PCV delete like mine pull air back into the engine in the opposite direction causing problems? I am using Kindergarten logic 101 for dummies on this one. Wouldn't this be similar to stating I can possibly blow exhaust out of my intake? I mean the current PCV is not a one way valve, so....How can venting to atmosphere be any more dangerous or harmful than the stock PCV?
Is there anything magical about the PCV. I didn't think so. I looked at a couple of different PCVs. I mean, what the heck, some are just pieces of metal with a tiny freakin hole in them. How the heck does that dumb thing fix anything, lol..... And the size of the hole, come on, that is barely venting any thing. If anything I state some of those PCVs are not venting enough. I about wet myself in the store when I took a seriously look at those things. I thought they were some kind of cool device or something. Looks more like a broken whistle to me.
I think one the big debate will be around this idea of metered air, vacuum and contaminated oil. Seriously, I don't see how a PCV delete is contaminating my oil to the point of needing oil changes measured in hundreds of miles vs. thousands.
thanks
kool-aide
-
12-25-2009, 04:40 PM #2
I don't think it's a debate. The drawback of PCV is oil mist in your intake that is mostly cured by a catch can. The benefits are less oil leakage, cleaner engine compartment, and cleaner engine. So you simply choose which you prefer. To me, if you have a catch can, the benefits far outweigh the drawbacks, to others they may not.
-
12-26-2009, 06:06 AM #3
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Location
- Deltona, FL
- Age
- 49
- Posts
- 1,220
Sebring Silver Metalic- 2002 Camaro Z28
I agree, but I have read others that make it sound like the last thing you ever want to do is run a catch can to atmosphere, e.g. delete the PCV.
I'm also curious about this combustion by product. Does an engine really produce sulfuric acid? I haven't done any research yet, but man that would be a real surprise to me.
I had the chance to take my z28 out for a ride yesterday. When I got home I could smell the fumes from the PCV. Now I had to stick my nose right up to the breather though. I'm a little congested. Maybe when I'm not sick I will do the sniff test again and see from how far away I can smell the fumes. I definitely noticed water condensing in the oil/water separator.
the only reason I am venting to atmosphere is because I didn't want any chance of any oil getting sucked back into the intake.
-
12-26-2009, 08:21 AM #4
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- Cedars, Pa
- Age
- 68
- Posts
- 105
White- '02 Camaro SS
Here are the other thoughts: Back in the day the vacuum used was drawn after the carburetor at the manifold intake so any blow by was right into the manifold and not gunking up the carb. With the advent of fuel injection and throttle bodies perceptions changed because guys were seeing their nice throttle bodies getting gunked up.
Also back in the day lead was outlawed in fuels as an octane booster. Lead had the added benefit of lubrication and sealing valve stems and seats. Now don't you think a little oil blow by into the intake would help here?
Get a good catch can, with a filter if it bothers you, and plug your PCV system back in. Also it really doesn't hurt to be a little green.
-
12-26-2009, 08:29 AM #5
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- Texas Department of Corrections
- Posts
- 18,128
- Retired Outlaw Sum Bitch
You would better served utilizing a top end lube like TCW3....but I like the way you think
-
12-26-2009, 08:33 AM #6
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Location
- Deltona, FL
- Age
- 49
- Posts
- 1,220
Sebring Silver Metalic- 2002 Camaro Z28
A little green? When I thought about the PCV post my first thought was the long tube guys and off road Y guys, lol.... I bet I am still more green than them. Of course I think I am like many out there. My f-body barely sees 7k miles a year, and that is a daily driver too. I just don't drive very far.
I don't know. I don't think oil and blow by sucked back into the intake is a good idea. I mean don't you really just want Air and Fuel and nothing else in there? Maybe the blow by may be ok. I guess if it was an unburnt air fuel mix. I just don't know, but I bet someone out there will set me straight.
Maybe I will take a second look under the hood and see if I can find a new mounting location and plug it back in.
Would you still use the PCV valve?
-
12-26-2009, 08:36 AM #7
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Location
- Deltona, FL
- Age
- 49
- Posts
- 1,220
Sebring Silver Metalic- 2002 Camaro Z28
yeah, I'm still running the TCW3 stuff. Works out handy too. Just about every two weeks I need about 10-10.2 gallons. Makes the measuring so easy.
What do you think of venting the PCV to atmosphere (plus the catch can) vs. running the catch can out line back into the intake port with no PCV valve?
I'm still thinking vent to atmosphere has nothing but positives, well for the engine. Any downside to plugging my catch can outlet back into the intake? Would the gas separated from the oil still be a downer?
-
12-26-2009, 08:41 AM #8
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- Cedars, Pa
- Age
- 68
- Posts
- 105
White- '02 Camaro SS
I read your piece on it a while back and have been doing it in my pick-em-up as that gets heavy use. I drive it upwards of 30k miles a year and change out the synthetic oil when the oil life monitor alerts me and it uses less than a quart of oil every in 7 to 7.5 thousand miles. It's an '03 Silverado 5.3 with 104k on it now.
My Camaro, an occasional toy and lightly modded has only 8.5k on it.
Just to note. Both of my LSX vehicles show little sign of what I think is heavy oil use so I see no need to use a catch can in my case. I know others that have done so and would if I saw a need.Last edited by SSnow; 12-26-2009 at 08:59 AM.
-
12-26-2009, 08:50 AM #9
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- Cedars, Pa
- Age
- 68
- Posts
- 105
White- '02 Camaro SS
Last edited by SSnow; 12-26-2009 at 08:56 AM.
-
12-26-2009, 08:58 AM #10
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Location
- Deltona, FL
- Age
- 49
- Posts
- 1,220
Sebring Silver Metalic- 2002 Camaro Z28
Oh, so it does sound like running the PCV to atmosphere as a downside.
Now I read in another post the LS1 can switch to using the 1009 part number for the PCV. The difference I saw between what you see in the paper look up book and 1009 was the size of the whole and the paper look up one has this sort of spring loaded thing. The 1009 PCV is empty inside.
-
12-26-2009, 09:18 AM #11
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- Cedars, Pa
- Age
- 68
- Posts
- 105
White- '02 Camaro SS
-
12-26-2009, 09:24 AM #12
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Location
- Deltona, FL
- Age
- 49
- Posts
- 1,220
Sebring Silver Metalic- 2002 Camaro Z28
yeah. I was trying to surf and find more PCV info. It seems the idea behind the light spring tension is to make sure you don't suck blow by back into the crank. Although i read it is not to be considered one way though, just kind of a check.
i wonder though. wouldn't an oil/water separator behave like a PCV valve? I'm not sure if there is anything in there to prevent the flow from going back against the thing. Personally I haven't tried to blow in mine, and now that it is dirty I don't think I want to.
-
12-26-2009, 09:31 AM #13
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- Cedars, Pa
- Age
- 68
- Posts
- 105
White- '02 Camaro SS
No, not like a check valve as that will respond to quick changes in pressure. There is a pressure drop across a filter. If clean it is small and as it becomes less effective (dirty, blocked) the differential increases. For all intents and purposes though the container is equalized and gravity will take over and any liquid will collect in the bottom.
-
12-26-2009, 10:02 AM #14
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- Tulsa,OK
- Age
- 43
- Posts
- 914
Quick Silver- 2002 Z06
From what I have read, anyone who has TONS of oil in their intake has a faulty PCV check valve. When that valve is operating properly there is no big deal.
Some people are anal and by all means putting a catch can will keep ALL oil from getting in the intake.
That aside, I think its a complete waste of time and effort unless you have a heads/cam setup that is causing increased blow by and therefore leading to extreme amounts of oil in the intake.
I would rank a PCV delete on a stock motor right there with a throttle body coolant bypass. Almost pointless
Slow Passenger Window - Want Passenger Express Down - Tired of Replacing DayTime Running Light Bulbs
Camaro Owners Click Here
Firebird Owners Click Here
Need instructions to replace your F-Body window motor?
www.AutoTrix.net
-
12-26-2009, 11:19 AM #15
-
12-26-2009, 11:23 AM #16
-
12-26-2009, 11:31 AM #17
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- Cedars, Pa
- Age
- 68
- Posts
- 105
White- '02 Camaro SS
-
12-26-2009, 02:55 PM #18
-
12-26-2009, 02:57 PM #19
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Location
- Deltona, FL
- Age
- 49
- Posts
- 1,220
Sebring Silver Metalic- 2002 Camaro Z28
I'm kind of surprised no one took a stab at the sulfuric acid question. guess it is time for a little searching.
I re-routed my PCV lines so I could send the outlet hose back into the intake port.
I am curious if I really need to use the PCV valve. The whole reason I started this PCV adventure was because that darn factory PCV boot tears apart. I have had two Camaros and they both suffered from the same kind of tears in that darn boot.
-
12-26-2009, 04:12 PM #20
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- Cedars, Pa
- Age
- 68
- Posts
- 105
White- '02 Camaro SS
[QUOTE=kool-aide;2186209]I'm kind of surprised no one took a stab at the sulfuric acid question. guess it is time for a little searching.
Read my first reply, it's in the quote of your question.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
The second debate...
By Smittro in forum Political / Debate ForumReplies: 10Last Post: 10-17-2012, 07:20 PM -
After much debate
By 10spokess in forum Camaro / SSReplies: 35Last Post: 01-18-2010, 06:44 PM -
more zr1 gtr debate
By tomsws6 in forum Almost Anything GoesReplies: 8Last Post: 07-31-2008, 06:49 PM -
Too Much Debate!!!
By clg82 in forum DrivetrainReplies: 41Last Post: 08-23-2007, 09:10 AM -
debate
By boobs in forum Almost Anything GoesReplies: 55Last Post: 03-25-2006, 08:22 PM
Bookmarks