Results 1 to 14 of 14
-
04-11-2010, 07:40 PM #1
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Location
- Rochester, NY Rochesterracing.com
- Posts
- 1,276
- 2000 Camaro B4C
Variance Between Mustang Dyno & Dynojet
Just wondering what the difference is between a mustang and dynojet, my buddy dyno'd 408rwhp on a dynojet and this afternoon put down 361 on a mustang dyno. What causes the variance in the HP#'s
2000 B4C Special Service Package Z28 - Kooks 1&7/8 Stepped 2'' - TSP Torquer V.2 - FAST 92/92 - BDR 4000 Conveter - Xtreme Trans Stage II - Full UMI Suspension - Pacesetter LT's - Comp Drag Shocks - Magnaflow - Cutout - ZO6 MAF - FTP LID - Street Tuned -
-
04-11-2010, 11:41 PM #2
dynojets are supposed to be pretty lenient with power numbers, at least that is the rumor. but mustang dynos seem to take into account more variables, maybe not but if you want a dynoqueen pull, take it to a dynojet. never really asked the question myself. i just went with the consensus.
-
04-18-2010, 08:47 PM #3
your tune is only as good as your tuner.
-
04-19-2010, 03:17 PM #4
Mustang is a "brake" dyno, meaning the motor operates against a measured load. It can even be held at a steady speed against the load. Useful for driveability tuning or simulated track testing. Imagine a Mustang Dyno as a motor-drived water pump where you can close down the water valve and make the motor work harder -or even choke down the motor, like driving a car up a steeper and steeper hill.
Dynojet is "inertial" or accelleration dyno. It calculates, rather than measures, how much power was required to speed up a known load, basically how fast it can speed up a heavy solid drum. The drum always weighs the same, but from motor to motor, power is calculated by the computer.
Both ways of measurement can be fudged by a couple of factors having to do with inputting incorrect vehicle weights and poor use of correction factors.
-
04-19-2010, 08:42 PM #5
-
04-19-2010, 08:42 PM #6
-
04-24-2010, 12:52 PM #7
The Mustang reads @ 13-14 % less than the Dynojet . The dynojet reading always looks better . But I believe the mustang is more beneficial when tuning .
-
04-24-2010, 05:15 PM #8
-
04-26-2010, 03:29 PM #9
-
04-28-2010, 01:41 PM #10
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Location
- Milwaukee
- Posts
- 3,276
Arctic White, red/gray- 1997 Corvette, 92 Typhoon
Mustang dynos have lower numbers but are better for testing and tuning, dynojets are for people who wanna say i made 400whp with a cam only ls1.
-
05-02-2010, 08:22 PM #11
-
05-02-2010, 08:24 PM #12
-
05-08-2010, 05:25 PM #13
Besides the fact of the brake system versus the inertia deal they (Mustang) use a whole different calculating factor.
Don't be afraid of the bottle!!! Be afraid of your tune!!!
-
05-22-2010, 10:18 PM #14
Yea I have a buddy that worked in a shop here in dayton ohio he said they had a dynojet and that no matter what was ran on it it always added 15-18% more than the true numbers because it soundes better
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
difference between mustang and dynojet
By vaticano in forum Dyno InformationReplies: 4Last Post: 08-04-2008, 10:08 PM -
Mustang Dyno
By JwMonE99 in forum Almost Anything GoesReplies: 8Last Post: 07-21-2008, 05:59 PM -
Dynojet dyno,Mustang dyno??
By speedydog in forum Dyno InformationReplies: 4Last Post: 08-13-2007, 04:57 AM -
How much between mustang/dynojet?
By powermad in forum Dyno InformationReplies: 2Last Post: 01-03-2007, 06:10 PM -
Mustang Dyno 2wd/awd
By xtech in forum New Member IntroductionsReplies: 0Last Post: 08-03-2006, 10:11 PM
Bookmarks