Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 23
  1. #1
    Member R_Yates69@Hotmail.com's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Nova Scotia, Canada
    Age
    39
    Posts
    239

    Red
    1999 Trans Am

    Dyno Numbers Not What Expected?

    Hey, I put my car on a dyno today, it couldn't read torque, but it said my RWHP was 347, I was expecting higher..anyone agree/disagree/suggestions?

    1999 Trans Am WS6 M6
    LS6 H/C/I
    Pacesetter Headers
    Corsa Exhaust
    SLP Lid
    Mail order tune from TSP

  2. #2
    Senior Member 00z28bubba's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    las vegas, nv
    Age
    36
    Posts
    1,389

    white
    2000 Z28

    how big of a cam. more than likely you might need to lighten up the drivetrain with a flywheel or maybe get a dyno tune. i wouldnt go with a mail order tune for internal mods and expect a whole lot. there are so many variables and more than likely mail orders for h/c is just to get the car running half decent enough to get a real tune. oh yeah how big of a cam. list your other mods aswell too. for all anybody knows it could just be a hotcam and some stock ls6 heads. i doubt it is but we really dont know what you have off the top of our heads.

  3. #3
    Member R_Yates69@Hotmail.com's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Nova Scotia, Canada
    Age
    39
    Posts
    239

    Red
    1999 Trans Am

    Hey man, read it lol LS6 H/C/I means LS6 heads, Ls6 Cam, LS6 Intake lol

  4. #4
    Veteran Hi-Po's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    10,467

    Black
    1999 TA WS.6

    Mustang dino?

    Either way I would say that is close.

  5. #5
    Member R_Yates69@Hotmail.com's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Nova Scotia, Canada
    Age
    39
    Posts
    239

    Red
    1999 Trans Am

    Dynojet..and a guy i talked to had pretty much the same setup as me and ran 337 before a good tune, now is like 373, so im going to try a tune out.

  6. #6
    Veteran Hi-Po's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    10,467

    Black
    1999 TA WS.6

    Its just a number. Dont get too caught up on it.

  7. #7
    Member R_Yates69@Hotmail.com's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Nova Scotia, Canada
    Age
    39
    Posts
    239

    Red
    1999 Trans Am

    ahaha i kno but its a number i paid money for haha Im going to try the dyno tune, and if that doesn't change it than so be it. but it is only amail order tune.

  8. #8
    Veteran Hi-Po's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    10,467

    Black
    1999 TA WS.6

    A 'good' tune will net you a better number, and a better running car.

  9. #9
    Senior Member 00z28bubba's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    las vegas, nv
    Age
    36
    Posts
    1,389

    white
    2000 Z28

    lol sorry. i figured it was an ls6 block for some reason(no clue why i thought that. any head work. that is where youll get higher numbers. the ls6 intake will let your engine breathe but its not set up to give you peak horspower. the only intake that will give you higher peak numbers is the fast 90/92. the ls6 cam isnt gonna give you a huge bump in power especially with untouched ls6 heads. its better than the stock ls1 cam and heads but its a smaller cam than a generally small cam(224r for example of a small cam). the heads show great numbers for builds when worked on. but all in all you just practically dropped in a used in some parts and new in others ls6 into your car. the blocks are very similar and the only difference is the h/c/i really. so your basically looking at a full bolt on ls6 outside of intake and throttle body.

  10. #10
    Unbiased Opinion 67rsss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    MN
    Posts
    147

    Red
    1967

    One, the Dyno has to read torque, that is how it calculates the Hp. As for the LS6 package, you are expecting way too much out of it. With a VRX3, 59CC 243's with big valves, LS6 intake, headers, full exhaust, we put 348rwhp/325rwt on a mustang dyno. That is about 407rwhp on a dynojet. Your reading a bit higher than I would have thought with your package....

  11. #11
    Member R_Yates69@Hotmail.com's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Nova Scotia, Canada
    Age
    39
    Posts
    239

    Red
    1999 Trans Am

    haha this is crazy, some people say i should be happy with the numbers, other people say a tune will draw out more, WHICH WAY DO I GO hah

  12. #12
    Unbiased Opinion 67rsss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    MN
    Posts
    147

    Red
    1967

    I would ignore the numbers, and get a tune anyway, even if you net no more braggin rights, you will get a better running car and be much happier with it!

  13. #13
    Knight of Chaos xzaero0's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Nebraska
    Age
    43
    Posts
    468

    Black
    2000 Trans Am

    Are you still running the stock 10 bolt or upgraded to a 12 bolt or 9". Either will draw more power from your over all numbers.

    If the dyno didnt read the TQ than I would think that there is something wrong with the dyno and would go find a differnt dyno.... this may be why your numbers arent what you are expecting.

    Scott

  14. #14
    Senior Member 00z28bubba's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    las vegas, nv
    Age
    36
    Posts
    1,389

    white
    2000 Z28

    the 9" will take more power than a 12 bolt, but the broken dyno may be correct.

  15. #15
    Senior Member karpetcm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Tujunga, CA
    Posts
    1,646

    White
    01 Camaro 6speed

    Those numbers to me seem low, im about 336 rwhp and with the LT's, ORY and re tune i should be about 350-355 rwhp. Your on the right path on deciding to get a dyno tune, i think in the end you will be much happier with the results and pull much better numbers.

  16. #16
    Awaiting Activation
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    81
    Dyno numbers are over rated, they are just a tuning tool. Run the thing on a track that will tell the true story.

  17. #17
    Unbiased Opinion 67rsss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    MN
    Posts
    147

    Red
    1967

    ...with a good and consistent driver...

  18. #18
    Member R_Yates69@Hotmail.com's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Nova Scotia, Canada
    Age
    39
    Posts
    239

    Red
    1999 Trans Am

    Yeoowy!

    hey guys, just got back from the Dyno, I guess Texas Speed tuned my car for texas and for a boosted, was getting too much fuel. Changed a few settings
    From 347RWHP to 375RWHP!

    Thanks for the support

  19. #19
    Awaiting Activation
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    81
    Another thing I dont like about dynos, a tuner can easily "sugar coat" the results...

  20. #20
    Member R_Yates69@Hotmail.com's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Nova Scotia, Canada
    Age
    39
    Posts
    239

    Red
    1999 Trans Am

    wtf? Sugar coat? lol

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. My dyno numbers.
    By allbaugh_04 in forum Computer & Tuning
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 06-27-2010, 06:58 PM
  2. Question: expected numbers
    By egod in forum Firebird / WS6
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 02-20-2009, 07:14 PM
  3. Tr230 dyno numbers 98 heads=bad numbers?
    By phoenix1987 in forum Dyno Information
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 09-11-2007, 08:33 AM
  4. my dyno numbers.... too much?
    By DADillac in forum Dyno Information
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 12-23-2006, 08:21 PM
  5. New Dyno Numbers...
    By Blown Interceptor in forum Western Members
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 10-29-2005, 09:06 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •