Results 1 to 10 of 10
Thread: lt1 rockers
-
02-04-2008, 09:51 PM #1
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- hixson tennessee
- Age
- 33
- Posts
- 1,641
white- 94 camaro z28
lt1 rockers
does anyone know what size the studs are for the rockers on an lt1. im looking at roller rockers and i don't know what to go with
-
02-17-2008, 02:13 PM #2
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Location
- Cedar Falls, Iowa
- Posts
- 36
Arctic White- 2001 Firebird Formula
not sure how to help u with this one.....do u just mean the ratio? if the vendor says there for lt1 engines there gonna fit. if i remember correctly i think stock ratio for lt1's are 1.5....i think u can get away with 1.7. your only gonna see maybe 10-15hp increase with this upgrade tho.
-
02-17-2008, 05:00 PM #3
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Location
- San Antonio
- Posts
- 44
Black- '96 Impala SS & '14 SS
-
02-17-2008, 09:26 PM #4
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- hixson tennessee
- Age
- 33
- Posts
- 1,641
white- 94 camaro z28
thanks i think i found some. comp cams 1.6 roller rockers. they are the steel ones that weigh as much as aluminum ones and are stronger evidently. i went with them because of what i read on another forum about power gains. i also am changing over to conical springs when i get the chance to do the project
-
02-17-2008, 09:38 PM #5
-
02-18-2008, 04:45 AM #6
-
02-18-2008, 12:38 PM #7
uhh, ok. they're still a shitty design that is susceptible to failure. Not my engine
-
02-18-2008, 06:27 PM #8
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Location
- San Antonio
- Posts
- 44
Black- '96 Impala SS & '14 SS
I've been using the 26918 Comp Cams Beehive Springs for the past two years......with .594 exhaust lift.....with no issues.
The LT4 springs wouldn't have lasted 5 miles in my engine; they're (IMO) not suitable for anything other than stock application.
Hate to disagree with a Super MOD......but you're dead wrong .
KW
-
02-18-2008, 06:50 PM #9
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- hixson tennessee
- Age
- 33
- Posts
- 1,641
white- 94 camaro z28
ok i was starting to think that i shouldn't get them. im getting head work done before i do all the stuff. i found a time i have a backup car so im taking advantage of that time to do all of my stuff at once. it looks like the first 3 days im getting body work done, then im pulling my heads and taking them to a shop to get ported and a 3 angle valve job, then im putting it all back together with a new valvetrain and cam and all the goodies.http://www.ls1.com/forums/images/smilies/dancenana.gif
-
02-18-2008, 10:51 PM #10
Go ahead and disagree with me all you want. I think you're dead wrong . I've seen plenty of those very COMP springs break on people. That spring design will never be a strong as a standard dual type spring, and I'm well aware of why it is designed the way it is. Besides, if his car is stock, he doesnt need anything more than a Hotcam spring. All you accomplish when you put too much spring in a motor is you eat up horsepower. Before our gear rule in my racing series, we ran our motors up to 6800-7100 rpm (circle track, so they live constantly between 4500-7000)... and guess what, I dont know of one person running a beehive type spring. I'm surprised you didnt read the endless threads that exist elsewhere on the net about people breaking them.... I hope for your sake that Comp got them figured out.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Rockers
By andyramsaran in forum GTOReplies: 0Last Post: 03-25-2010, 12:02 PM -
are 243 OEM rockers the same as 853 OEM rockers
By qwik219d9 in forum Internal EngineReplies: 1Last Post: 12-29-2009, 12:30 PM -
Rockers
By phoenix1987 in forum Internal EngineReplies: 12Last Post: 09-08-2006, 02:11 PM -
1.8 rockers
By Ratdaddy07 in forum Internal EngineReplies: 12Last Post: 05-31-2006, 10:34 AM -
rockers
By jay_7681 in forum LT1Replies: 4Last Post: 08-14-2005, 06:44 AM
Bookmarks