ws.6 vs mr2 spyder

**JustAFan** · 01-14-2010, 02:04 PM

im really in to firebirds but i dont know a whole lot about them and my friend is convinced that a toyota mr2 spyder can smoke a ws.6 but i dont know enough about either to say yes or no

**Cutlass** · 01-14-2010, 02:31 PM

no, ws6 should win.

**T/Aboo** · 01-14-2010, 03:14 PM

2005 MR2 Spyder: 0-60 = 6.9
2001 T/A WS.6: 0-60 = 4.9

You make the call.

**justinmc978** · 01-14-2010, 03:23 PM

mr2 = wannabe porsche

might beat him on a road course with midengine & lightweight but as far as a straight up drag your friend is a tard,

**waldo** · 01-14-2010, 03:41 PM

you would have more fun with the ws.6.

**2000LS1Bird** · 01-14-2010, 05:40 PM

MR2 Spider? I thought those were slow as crapt.

6.9? No way they're that fast. And if they were, they're just 4-cylinders. On the top end the difference would be bus-lengths.

This is even dumb to talk about. Its like wondering if Mike Tyson could whip the shiat outta Stephen Colbert.

**4thGenTA** · 01-14-2010, 05:45 PM

you would win! give him 5+ car lengths, then it might be close, until you reach 2nd gear haha.

**justinmc978** · 01-14-2010, 05:45 PM

Originally Posted by 2000LS1Bird

MR2 Spider? I thought those were slow as crapt.

6.9? No way they're that fast. And if they were, they're just 4-cylinders. On the top end the difference would be bus-lengths.

This is even dumb to talk about. Its like wondering if Mike Tyson could whip the shiat outta Stephen Colbert.

would pay millions to see

**jrc1122** · 01-14-2010, 05:47 PM

NO contest WS6 FTW....

I actually traded a 2000 MR2-Spyder in for a 2002 WS6.

and mine was modified fairly heavily, turbo, full exhaust, intake, lowered, suspension work, rims etc.... and my TA was still faster.

Don't get me wrong with all those modifications it was a quick little car. Very fun car, but not WS6 fast.

**justinmc978** · 01-14-2010, 05:56 PM

i like the mr2, i was considering one for gas milage and rarity honestly, but i was also considering a wrangler tj sport so

**waldo** · 01-14-2010, 06:22 PM

Originally Posted by 2000LS1Bird

MR2 Spider? I thought those were slow as crapt.

6.9? No way they're that fast. And if they were, they're just 4-cylinders. On the top end the difference would be bus-lengths.

This is even dumb to talk about. Its like wondering if Mike Tyson could whip the shiat outta Stephen Colbert.

Stephen Colbert is going to get you for that.

**Smokaholik** · 01-18-2010, 11:17 AM

Originally Posted by 4thGenTA

you would win! give him 5+ car lengths, then it might be close, until you reach 2nd gear haha.

I say 10+ car lengths. come on mr2 spyder vs WS.6 really.

**onyxecosah** · 01-19-2010, 10:21 PM

The stock MR2 ricer cant compete with a Ws6

**wickedbeast** · 01-20-2010, 12:36 AM

stupid thread!!

**weberje** · 01-24-2010, 12:47 PM

quoted from Waldo:
T/A's beat everything on the road, we all know that. why are these questions even asked? I don't get it. perhaps a better question would be what if a T/A raced the space shuttle to earths outer most atmosphere which would win?

A: the T/A, cuz they are the fastest thing in the galaxy

Nuff Said...