Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Detroit
    Age
    42
    Posts
    1,664

    Black/Red/Black/Red
    98WS6/06MCSS/86GN/06H3

    Question Was the Plymouth GTX the shit back in the day? Also 340vs383

    A lot of older guys i run into tell me they had a late 60's gtx and then go on to praise it as the great gospel for style and performance of the era??? LOL All of the articles and books point to the 69-71 cuda/camaro/Chevelle/GS/Superbird/Daytona as the definitive cars of the era. Was it a feared car back in the day how popular was it?...i must of had 4 guys in the past year brag on these cars......

    Classic mopar bonus question:

    Why is/was the 340 so much more respected than the 383? I have heard so many stories of built 340's being amazing motors, but whenever i mention the 383, they just say they don't remember it having as much potential......i would like your thoughts on this also.

  2. #2
    I like turtles GTP231's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Corn and Soybean fields
    Posts
    5,483

    Gray/ White
    09Ram 1500 83 Thunderturd

    GTX was a "gentleman's muscle car" depending on the engine it would bitch slap other cars like any 440 6 pak or Hemi car
    340s were strictly performance specific small blocks. They never offered detained versions unlike a 383 you could get a 2 bbl option
    83 Thunderturd even bigger turd probably LQ4 4L80 swap at some point
    Quote Originally Posted by 0rion View Post
    the guys here know how to find a nekkid chick farting into a cake but 2+2 stumps the shit out of 'em.
    Quote Originally Posted by pajeff02 View Post
    My brain must be defective.
    Quote Originally Posted by Zapper2003 View Post
    Says the king of mockery and shit talking

  3. #3
    Exalted Cyclops 67CamaroRSSS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    5,823

    2002 Z28 A4 NBM
    Sadly now demodded :(

    To be honest, it depends on which car the engine was in as whether one ran better than the other. Like Carpy stated, the 340 was an outgrowth of the 318 "LA" small block Mopar that was never offered as a "detuned" version like the 273/318/360. It was a 3.31 stroke X 4.04 bore high-winding engine that was built with premium parts (shotpeened forged steel crank, connecting rods, push rods, and pistons). It also had 2.02/1.60 valves. Challenger TA and Cuda AAR blocks had extra webbing to facilitate adding 4 bolt mains.

    The 383, OTOH, had a 4.250 bore with a 3.375 stroke which made it a high winding assembly also but the block was much heavier, being that the bottom of the block was 3" below the crank center line ("Y" block design like all Mopar "B" and "RB" engines). While a "B" or "RB" (RB means "Raised Block" as these had a raised deck similar to the Chevy big block truck engines) engine was used in the same vehicles as the 340 those engines made it nose heavy (just like all the other "pony" cars). They even put a 440 into the 69 Cuda (1st time that name was used - all others were called Barracuda's) to homologate it for drag racing. Talk about a tight fit....

    I've had a 67 383 Baracuda. Ran like a raped ape in a straight line. My friend had a 68 with a 318 in it. Not so fast but it sure handled and braked much better.

    I had a 383 in my 66 Charger that I built up. From 3500 to 6500 rpm it ran really good. I put 3.91 gears in it and used a 3,000 stall so it could get out of the hole. It was still nose heavy because of the engine weight but I didn't care as that top end charge put a smile on my face. It also didn't hurt that a car that big (unibody design) weighed in at only a tad bit over 3500 lbs.

    So, are you doing the 1/4 mile or going around a road course?

    I'll reply on the GTX (my cousin had a 69 with a 440) later as I'm at work right now...
    Last edited by 67CamaroRSSS; 04-07-2016 at 03:00 PM.
    67 Camaro: K-K + 797-z (look it up), 454/Th400/4.10 12-bolt = 6mpg, PS/PDB/PW tilt, tach, gauges...

    2005 Corvette LS2/M6 Magnetic Red Metallic (What else would it be?) w/ Cashmere interior

    2002 Z28: NBM/Tan, MTI smooth lid, smooth bellows, !AIR, !cats, 1-3/4" QTP SS LT's, 2-1/2" TD's with X-pipe, MagnaFlows dumped at axle, custom welded SFC's, MidWest Chassis body mount adjustable T/A, 3400 stall, 3.23 gears (was 2.73). Tuned: 343rwhp/357rwt (before TD's). Best: 12.559 @ 108+, 1.73 60' @ 3500' DA w/MT ET Street DR's.

    Carbon footprint? CLOWN SHOE!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Hot Rod To The Rescue - 1980 Plymouth Arrow
    By Ed Blown Vert in forum General Help
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-10-2013, 05:10 AM
  2. 1968 Plymouth GTX - Go To Xtremes
    By Ed Blown Vert in forum Almost Anything Goes
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-04-2009, 10:20 AM
  3. Buying: 90 or 91 Plymouth Laser RS AWD 5 speed
    By xinthenight in forum Vehicles For Sale / Trade
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-03-2007, 04:26 PM
  4. Muscle Car playoffs..Plymouth
    By snaggeltooth in forum Almost Anything Goes
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 01-28-2007, 12:33 PM
  5. 1974 Plymouth Satellite Sebring Plus
    By LS1 Trans am in forum Classic Muscle
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 11-07-2006, 08:27 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •