Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    Chief of his tribe! LSCyaL8R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    1,460

    Navy Blue Metallic
    2000 T/A Firehawk M6

    Experimental Engine.....

    So in the always escalating horsepower wars big developments are sometimes made. For many years now Ford has coaxed horsepower to compete with GM and Chrysler from the "relatively" low displacement 4.6L. It's had it's high points, think terminators, but the NA versions can only go so far on that design and displacement. Remember the Mod motor has been around since 1991.

    Ford is finally done doing more with less and has decided to do more with more.

    With that I introduce project code name 777. Those 7's have meaning... Meaning like 7.0L 700hp 7,000RPM

    This engine was put together by roush for Ford using the new BOSS V8 project that will debut on the SVT Raptor later in the 2010 production year. That 700hp is NA btw....... This engine has been running at NMRA events around the country.

    Where's the genV V8? I suddenly feel like I need one



    I guess we know what SVT has in store for the 2012-2013 Cobra....

  2. #2
    Sold: LS1 '85 El Camino ls1camino's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Laurel, Maryland
    Posts
    4,975

    2000 Grand Prix GTP
    2000 Trans Am WS6 M6

    It will still weigh 1000lbs more than my TA, and with 600hp, I may be able to keep up with it

  3. #3
    Member c5z28's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Bay Area
    Posts
    8,114

    On your ass flashing
    my highbeams

    link or pics to motor? I can live with that since the new a/c cobras are going to be ls-3 powered.

  4. #4
    Senior Member bluehawk2000's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    1,501

    midnight blue
    2000 trans am

    yea but you dont realize that the new supersnake I read a magazine where they dyno'd it and they overrated that car by over a 150 horsepower, said it was 750 horsepower and it put down on the dyno only a little over 600 which is freakin horrible. The hennessy camaro was rated at 650 it put down 636 to the rear wheels, the poor challenger was rated at 700 and only dyno'd 493 to the rear wheels, whats wrong with this picture. Out of all 3 of them the camaro was faster from 0-60 and 0-100 and run better quarter miles, I wouldnt doubt if this car will be overrated.

  5. #5
    Chief of his tribe! LSCyaL8R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    1,460

    Navy Blue Metallic
    2000 T/A Firehawk M6

    I can't find pics of the motor. try googling 777 you will get lots of turbofan pics with stage 1 fans as wide as the fuselage of a 737. Gotta love the GE 90-115B! You will find text articles relating to the engine and how it's been running in the NMRA circuit. Also it's similarities and differences vs the modular engines.

    http://ezinearticles.com/?Fords-Late...oss&id=2001791

  6. #6
    Member CJREX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    GA
    Posts
    701
    Gone:2001 Camaro SS #4846

    Quote Originally Posted by bluehawk2000 View Post
    I wouldnt doubt if this car will be overrated.
    I don't think SVT will EVER overrate an engine again after the debacle and subsequent recalls with the 1999 Cobra.

    John Coletti, SVT Chief at the time, basically vowed that never again would an SVT product not make what it claims.

    Note the stock RWHP numbers of the 1999-2003 Lightnings (335-360 at the wheels, rated 360-380 at the engine) and 2003 Cobras (360-390 rwhp, 390 rated). They were both significantly underrated.

  7. #7
    LSwut tep98ws6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Saint Louis, MO
    Posts
    1,705

    Arctic White & Black
    '98 WS6 M6 - SWAPTIME!

    the new raptors

  8. #8
    Senior Member snaggeltooth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    alabama
    Posts
    7,203

    Gray
    2012 Challenger R/T

    ..
    the 6.2

  9. #9
    Senior Member snaggeltooth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    alabama
    Posts
    7,203

    Gray
    2012 Challenger R/T


  10. #10
    James Bond Spikito's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Texas
    Age
    37
    Posts
    4,546

    2001 3.8 Black - sold
    2000 SS Black M6

    Quote Originally Posted by bluehawk2000 View Post
    yea but you dont realize that the new supersnake I read a magazine where they dyno'd it and they overrated that car by over a 150 horsepower, said it was 750 horsepower and it put down on the dyno only a little over 600 which is freakin horrible. The hennessy camaro was rated at 650 it put down 636 to the rear wheels, the poor challenger was rated at 700 and only dyno'd 493 to the rear wheels, whats wrong with this picture. Out of all 3 of them the camaro was faster from 0-60 and 0-100 and run better quarter miles, I wouldnt doubt if this car will be overrated.
    I know what video you saw. the challenger they were gonna test was 700, but something on it broke, so they sent a similar N/A model that put down about what it claimed it would.....they put together the video poorly

  11. #11
    11 years of bangin gears cammed goat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    North Jersey
    Posts
    11,496

    Phantom Black Metallic
    2004 GTO M6

    Well, we still have Nickey and GMPP waiting to fire back at the blue oval. I am sure other GM aftermarket suppoerters are on standby.

  12. #12
    Senior Member snaggeltooth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    alabama
    Posts
    7,203

    Gray
    2012 Challenger R/T

    We thought it was pretty slick when the first-generation S197 Ford Mustang produced just over 300 horsepower right off the dealership lot. That’s a healthy dose of power from a V8 power plant..or at least we once thought it was. Now, what if we told you the 2011 Ford Mustang V6 is set to produce the same amount of power? It’s true. The sixer of tomorrow that will be in the Ford Mustang for 2011 is rated at a substantial 305 horsepower and also boasts a miserly fuel consumption ratio of about 30 miles per gallon (highway)

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-17-2013, 09:30 AM
  2. Experimental Corvette SS
    By trev0006 in forum Corvette
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-15-2010, 10:54 AM
  3. Small Block Chevy Engine - Build Your First Engine - Tech
    By Ed Blown Vert in forum Camaro / SS
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-30-2008, 07:50 PM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-29-2007, 06:50 AM
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-01-2007, 10:00 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •