Results 1 to 12 of 12
Thread: turbo kit ????? of course
-
09-27-2009, 09:56 AM #1
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Location
- tampa
- Posts
- 3
black- 2002 camaro
turbo kit ????? of course
i was looking at this turbo kit and was woundering if anyone has used it or has any comments on it http://www.ls1turbo.com.au/us/fbody_genttr.html
-
09-29-2009, 09:46 AM #2
-
09-30-2009, 09:50 AM #3
yes I have that set up o my 2006 GTO. So what performance r u looking 4. ie: strip or street. Is this 4 a GTO ???? looking 4 600hp? forged internals? heads, cam, fuel rails, and most important of all Tuning. you don't really need a cam w/ this type of setup stock will do if this is 4 a GTO
-
09-30-2009, 11:29 AM #4
I see the price is only $4300, not bad for a twin turbo kit with those numbers. Of course you'll still need a fuel pump, injectors, K-member, tune, ect. Still cheaper than the APS kit by a lot though.
-
09-30-2009, 02:24 PM #5
i dont know about the truck application. the charge pipes are mounted under the frame making them the lowest point on the vehicle. looks pretty sketchy to me. as long as you dont have a truck you should be ok lol.
-
09-30-2009, 03:00 PM #6
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Location
- tampa
- Posts
- 3
black- 2002 camaro
its for a 2002 camaro so that all of u know and thanks for the input guys i guess its time to save save save then
-
09-30-2009, 03:02 PM #7
-
10-19-2009, 03:02 PM #8
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Location
- Newark, ohio
- Posts
- 78
Maple Red Metallic- 2000 Pontiac Trans Am
ive never heard of the "gent" turbo brand before
-
10-19-2009, 03:55 PM #9
Uhm..well..i run a pair of 35mm on my built LS6 pushing 12psi..i dont have the claimed
650 rwhp..and those pipes are really low in the front..By just reading the article my gut feeling is to stay away from that deal..and yes you will need the extra fuel pump..
-
10-21-2009, 07:59 AM #10
If that's the case, there is something wrong with your setup. I have a bone-stock LS6 vette with headers, meth, and supercharger that makes 620s on 9psi. Another 3 psi and it would be in the high 600s. Really ANY turbo setup that is within reason will make more than that with less boost.
This is assuming that you understand trans types/dynos, etc. Automatics will always dyno low though by comparison to that 6-speed vette I was talking about.
-
10-21-2009, 04:15 PM #11
-
10-21-2009, 06:19 PM #12
I had a cam-only M6 car once that made 386ish rwhp. He added a P1sc at 5psi. At 5psi, I could only make 445rwhp with it on the edge of knock. We turned on the methanol and retuned and it made 493rwhp and was no where near knocking.
With those numbers, you must have some IAT rise. The methanol helps cooling tremendously under boost. Pure methanol has fuel and octane value as well.
If you buy a kit, stay away from cheap kits. This is not the place to save a dollar. Look at the kits made by Alkycontrol. I have worked with many, theirs is top shelf. They come with a GM MAP sensor so they are progressive with boost. It lasts a long time per fill up. I can't think of a good reason NOT to use it.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
turbo ls 240sx vs turbo mustang + video
By Sleeper101 in forum Kill StoriesReplies: 30Last Post: 07-26-2011, 09:44 AM -
Wanted: Trade my HUGE turbo for your smaller turbo
By Iknowthefuture in forum Parts Wanted / TradeReplies: 0Last Post: 08-30-2010, 05:47 PM -
Pontiac Firebird Turbo Installation - Subterranean Turbo System
By Ed Blown Vert in forum GTOReplies: 0Last Post: 09-29-2007, 06:50 AM -
Pontiac Firebird Turbo Installation - Subterranean Turbo System
By Ed Blown Vert in forum Firebird / WS6Replies: 1Last Post: 09-12-2007, 06:16 PM -
camaro turbo vs 3000gt turbo
By GONZO SS in forum Multimedia SectionReplies: 6Last Post: 01-01-2007, 06:58 PM
Bookmarks