Results 1 to 20 of 32
Thread: camaro with sts sys
-
05-24-2006, 11:32 PM #1
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Location
- CHARLOTTE
- Age
- 39
- Posts
- 9
SILVER- 2001 SS
camaro with sts sys
can someone give me an idea on what my car might do at the trak
only have a sts sys run 5 lbs of boost 436hp/456t,fuelpump boosterLast edited by eddie sae; 05-24-2006 at 11:36 PM.
-
05-27-2006, 02:41 PM #2
436hp @ the wheels or flywheel? What Elevation? M6 or A4?
-
05-31-2006, 08:50 PM #3
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Location
- CHARLOTTE
- Age
- 39
- Posts
- 9
SILVER- 2001 SS
436hp at the rear tires. have the dyno sheet dont know how to put on.
-
06-01-2006, 03:28 AM #4
those are some good #'s
98' SS Convertible Camaro-76k-Build # 1471, Cragar SS rims, RK SFC's, MAC Panhard, LSX Tune, Shaner S3,
SLP:short thro,Strut tower brace,fan switch
MTI Power induction kit,40 Series muffler,Pacesetter LT's + ORY,12 CD changer,3800lbs
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/787506/1
-
06-01-2006, 03:28 AM #5
do you have any suspension mods, you will need them bad, PHB, SFC's, STB, LCA's,
-
06-01-2006, 08:59 PM #6
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Location
- Memphis, TN
- Posts
- 8
Silver- 2002 Z28
Drag radials or stock rubber?
Most LS1/STS only cars are mid 12's, if you get the launch down.
-
06-01-2006, 09:02 PM #7
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Location
- Memphis, TN
- Posts
- 8
Silver- 2002 Z28
I just saw this.
http://www.ls1.com/forums/showthread.php?t=18595TimeslipRegistry.com
Timeslip database and racing videos
-
06-02-2006, 12:22 AM #8
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
- Williamsburg, Virginia
- Age
- 52
- Posts
- 11
White- 2002 Camaro Z28
Originally Posted by eddie sae
-
06-02-2006, 04:35 PM #9
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
- Fort Irwin, CA.
- Age
- 39
- Posts
- 62
Black- 2002 Trans AM
Wow those are pretty good numbers!! How is ground clearance on the sts kits?
-
06-03-2006, 12:33 AM #10
-
06-04-2006, 03:20 PM #11
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Location
- CHARLOTTE
- Age
- 39
- Posts
- 9
SILVER- 2001 SS
dont know but they put some suspention on the chasy and rear tires.
i guess its good clearance about 5 to 7 inches front and back.i also had it tuned by cpracing here in charlotte
i've been very happy with there work.placed the dyno sheet in profile dont know how to place in thread.Last edited by eddie sae; 06-04-2006 at 03:40 PM.
-
06-06-2006, 04:58 PM #12
With a good driver and slicks you could def get that car with 436 to the wheels the run 11.8's if its a stick!
-
06-10-2006, 11:13 PM #13
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Location
- CHARLOTTE
- Age
- 39
- Posts
- 9
SILVER- 2001 SS
its an automatic. and i just noticed that they put sub frame connectors and traction bars in with the sts .
-
06-11-2006, 04:32 PM #14
Yeah, depending on what tires you use, you should be in the low to mid 12's and running somewhere around 116mph. The STS provides a lot of horsepower but it's topend horsepower so it's hard to put it to the ground in the quarter mile. When I ran mine last summer I noticed that most of the power didn't kick in until the 1/8 mile.
-
06-11-2006, 05:02 PM #15
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- THE SWAMP
- Posts
- 1,446
Light Pewter Metallic- 2000 Camaro SS M6
Man, that clearance sux!!! There's got to be a better way to route that. The clearance problem is what turns me off about that system.
-
06-11-2006, 11:02 PM #16
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Location
- CHARLOTTE
- Age
- 39
- Posts
- 9
SILVER- 2001 SS
it depends on where you live. if you live in the city its good clearance and the speed bumps dont really matter because the front tubing is right in the middle of the front tires so when you hit the bump every thing goes up.its the same thing for the rear tubing and turbo so you still have the clearance. the bad things are pothole but they are a problem to any car with any modification on the cassy like sub frame connectors and traction bars,or long tube headers.
Last edited by eddie sae; 06-11-2006 at 11:09 PM.
-
06-11-2006, 11:16 PM #17
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Location
- CHARLOTTE
- Age
- 39
- Posts
- 9
SILVER- 2001 SS
Originally Posted by 02IKND
you think low 12ths is the best i could get. i ran in the 1/8 once and ran 8.64.
but i had the tires spinning for about 10-15 ft. they were street tires.and i was starting to feel the turbo kick in when the 1/8 was over.
-
06-12-2006, 02:51 PM #18
Well on my runs with a 8.3 1/8 mile I ran 12.5's in the quarter at 117mph. I know I had bad quarter mile times but I was also not running on all cylinders.
-
06-13-2006, 06:16 AM #19
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
- greenville sc
- Age
- 26
- Posts
- 88
white- 02
im debating on losing the nos and running the sts. i have a 02 ss 345 package and it dynoed 349 RWHP off the show room floor. i spray a 100 shot and make 447 RWHP at the moment which is good for 11.6s on spray and 12.6s on motor in the quarter and 7.3s in the 1/8 on spray and 7.8s on motor. what would my numbers be with an sts. i heard it bolts on 150 rwhp at 8 lbs of boost. is this true?
-
06-13-2006, 04:31 PM #20
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Location
- CHARLOTTE
- Age
- 39
- Posts
- 9
SILVER- 2001 SS
i got 111 hp on 5 lbs of boost and i have enjoyed my system alot so as for me i do recomend it .
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
1967 Chevrolet Camaro - Classic Camaro With A Big-Inch Punch
By Ed Blown Vert in forum Camaro / SSReplies: 0Last Post: 04-06-2012, 04:10 PM -
1999 trans am, 1995 z28 camaro, 1979 z28 camaro for sell!!!!
By poneykiller2k4 in forum Vehicles For Sale / TradeReplies: 7Last Post: 08-11-2007, 05:12 PM -
FS 97-02 Camaro Taillights/Ebony TTop shades/Camaro 35th model car
By nhra-trans-am in forum Parts For Sale / TradeReplies: 2Last Post: 08-01-2007, 11:34 AM -
This is a 2001 Baldwin-Motion Tribute Camaro featured in Camaro Performance this mont
By blackbirdpr1 in forum Vehicles For Sale / TradeReplies: 1Last Post: 05-10-2007, 03:03 PM -
02 Camaro SS Auto vs 95 Camaro Z28 and Camaro SS vs 00 Trans Am WS6
By zbizkit in forum Multimedia SectionReplies: 19Last Post: 01-12-2007, 11:52 AM
Bookmarks