RAN INTO THE SLR MCLAREN 2 NIGHT!! 617 horses stock

[Silverado2000LS1]

X2

Johnny...We have a couple winners...They took the bait....hook, line and sinker....lol. Tell them what they have won!!........

[john]

Johnny...We have a couple winners...They took the bait....hook, line and sinker....lol. Tell them what they have won!!........

Yup. I noticed your clever reply to several posts here. I thought you were an idiot who thought a GTO could hang with a $400,000 super car. Now I realize what a mastermind you really are.

[Silverado2000LS1]

Yup. I noticed your clever reply to several posts here. I thought you were an idiot who thought a GTO could hang with a $400,000 super car. Now I realize what a mastermind you really are.

Just in good fun guys.....Take care, be safe, and Happy Holidays to all!!...

[Marc87GN]

Agreed. I'm not too impressed with them either. Now, the Lingenfelter package for the C5 just before he passed.... a TT-C5, running 0-60 in under two seconds, 9 second flat quarter mile, top speed of well over 200mph, street legal, and a fraction of the cost of the McLaren above.

... now that's impressive.

That's because you guys are only 1 dimensional. The MB cars have more technology in the seats than the C5 has in it's entire car. I have been a GM fan for over 20 years and was a MB tech for years and the technology is not even close. Of course, I would love a TT C5, but let's be a little more open minded about what we are comparing it to from an overall perspective.

[redls1bird]

A GTO or Z06 would have killed it.

That must be one sick gto....



SLR NUMBERS

Motor Trend Magazine
5.5 L, V-8, 5 speed Automatic
0-50 2.90 sec.
0-60 3.60 sec.
0-70 4.40 sec.
1/4 Mile11.60 sec.
60-0 Braking103.00 ft.
IssueJan-05
Skidpad 0.97 g.
Slalom 68.30 mph
back to top

Road and Track Magazine:
5.5 L, V-8, 5 speed Automatic
0-50 2.80 sec.
0-60 3.50 sec.
0-70 4.30 sec.
1/4 Mile 11.50 sec.
1st Gear 87.00 dBA
50 mph Cruising 73.00 dBA
60-0 Braking 107.00 ft.
70 mph 73.00 dBA
80-0 Braking 186.00 ft.
Idle54.00 dBA
IssueJul-05
Skidpad0.97 g.
Slalom69.60 mph
Top Speed207.00 mph


'06 Z06 NUMBERS

Performance
0-60 mph: 3.7 sec
0-100 mph: 7.9 sec
Quarter Mile: 11.5 sec @ 127 mph
Skidpad: 1.02g
Top Speed: 198 mph
Braking, 60-0 mph: --- ft
Slalom Speed: --.- mph

'04 gto numbers

Performance
0-60 mph: 5.3 sec
0-100 mph: 12.9 sec
Quarter Mile: 13.8 sec @ 103.8 mph
Skidpad: .81g
Top Speed: 160 mph
Braking, 60-0 mph: 132 ft
Slalom Speed: 63.4 mph


a c6 zo6 might have hung with it, i sure doubt it would have "killed it". oh and a gto would have looked like a civic in comparison to a slr.

[delinquent543]

That's because you guys are only 1 dimensional. The MB cars have more technology in the seats than the C5 has in it's entire car. I have been a GM fan for over 20 years and was a MB tech for years and the technology is not even close. Of course, I would love a TT C5, but let's be a little more open minded about what we are comparing it to from an overall perspective.

i have to agree. also, anyone who pays 400,000 for a car probably has a few other insane cars...

[third_shift|studios]

HOLY SHIT! they totally just had this car on VH1- donald trump bought one for his birthday...OMG! they had a promo video clip of it, DAMMMMN this car sounds like a fucking F1!!!!

[redls1bird]

Johnny...We have a couple winners...They took the bait....hook, line and sinker....lol. Tell them what they have won!!........

Does anyone have some pliers so i can get the hook out of my mouth?