Results 21 to 28 of 28
Thread: M3
-
03-05-2008, 03:53 PM #21
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- Cave Run Lake area, Kentucky
- Age
- 39
- Posts
- 1,001
Pewter- 2002 T/A WS6
My buddy down in Florida (when I lived there) has a nice silver, vert M3. I like it, it's a nice car. The leather inside is nice, but it isn't THAT much nicer and the interior isn't as amazing as the Euro guys play them up as, but still a great car. Used and from the same year (2002 or so) they aren't THAT much difference in price really. I think he paid less for his M3 than I did my WS6.
They handle good, but the verts are really, really heavy (heavier than our cars). You can make a F-body handle too though, but I'm sure everyone here knows that already so I'll just shut up.
Point being, no need for anyone to diss an M3. May not be your cup of tea, but it's a quality car and I wouldn't mind having one as a DD or something.
-
03-06-2008, 07:12 AM #22
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Phoenix, Az
- Posts
- 27
White- 1999 e36 M
-
03-06-2008, 07:16 AM #23
-
03-06-2008, 11:17 AM #24
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Gainesville, VA
- Posts
- 654
That's not 100% true you pay a lot of extra $$$ to have that symbol on your car. The overall quality and components used do not add up to the overall price difference. Give me a low mile ls1 and the price difference and I'll build a car that out performs a BMW in everyway.
The reason why mustangs out sold Firebirds/Camaros had nothing to do with them being a better car. It's the fact Mustangs have always been more popular and ford did a better job marketing them. The quality and performance of an f-body LS1 is better in every aspect then a mustang with the exception for the 03/04 cobras.
I'm not bashing BMWs i've driven plenty of them from 3s, 5s, 7s and Ms. I find them to be great driving cars but a little heavy and under powered. IMO even the Ms are unpowered considering their cost.
-
03-06-2008, 12:32 PM #25
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Phoenix, Az
- Posts
- 27
White- 1999 e36 M
I’ve had a lot of seat time in the e46 M and driven a 01 SS. Both are great cars but very different. I have a lot of respect for that LS1 motor and the low-end torque is great.
The camaro has more of a usable power band; the M3 has to be rung-out hard (333 hp @7900 RPM) all the power is made up top. Its not a matter of making up ground as much as the M3 is coming into its element. In a stock for stock all out races the SS will be the faster car until around 150 or so. At that point the M will reel him in and walk away. Not because it’s a “better car” its because it was designed to maintain high speeds for a long duration of time, It’s an Autobahn machine. 333hp 7900 RPM 3:62 gears.
E46 M pulls to 8k in every gear, it basically come down to which car runs out of breath first…
By the way, I wouldn’t mind dropping that LS1 motor in my e36 M with some bolt-ons.
-
03-06-2008, 12:41 PM #26
-
03-06-2008, 05:31 PM #27
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Phoenix, Az
- Posts
- 27
White- 1999 e36 M
-
03-07-2008, 07:54 AM #28
Ya ill keep my SS...
If i want to go faster, ill take the R6!!
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks