Page 11 of 11 FirstFirst ... 7891011
Results 201 to 208 of 208

Thread: Friends Prelude

  1. #201
    !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ATCharming's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Rockford, IL
    Age
    33
    Posts
    8,311

    Silver
    2000 Camaro SS

    ^^^ the way u get that type of MPG numbers is by changing ur dash display or wherever it says ur gas mileage, etc. i took a roadtrip in my moms cobalt, and u can have it in "average mpg" which obviously tells u what ur average is the whole time uvebeen driving, or "current mpg" or something like that, which baically says how much gas ur using that second. i got the current mpg up to 52 in the cobalt, cuz i put it in neutral and went down a huuuuuuuge hill. that does not mean that i got 52mpg on that roadtrip.

  2. #202
    Member Zedicous's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Slidell, LA.
    Age
    55
    Posts
    397

    Mystic Magentic Red
    99 C5, 98 Z28.

    Quote Originally Posted by ATCharming View Post
    ^^^ the way u get that type of MPG numbers is by changing ur dash display or wherever it says ur gas mileage, etc. i took a roadtrip in my moms cobalt, and u can have it in "average mpg" which obviously tells u what ur average is the whole time uvebeen driving, or "current mpg" or something like that, which baically says how much gas ur using that second. i got the current mpg up to 52 in the cobalt, cuz i put it in neutral and went down a huuuuuuuge hill. that does not mean that i got 52mpg on that roadtrip.
    No such thing in a 93 civic plus the drive is all slightly up hill from LA. I was able to get those motors to run so efficient and thats why i'm getting them for the kids..

  3. #203
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Fort Benning, GA
    Age
    42
    Posts
    435

    Black
    '91 turbo fox, '97 vette

    Quote Originally Posted by Zedicous View Post
    I'm not asking you to believe, it is a fact. The car also wasn't stock. The actual number was 62.3 and there were three to witness it also. Another good factor is i had it since new, so it was well taken care of. The car ran very efficient. I havn't driven far enough to know yet but the RSX-S does get 28mpg city driving.
    I don't care if there were 3 or a 1000 witnesses... They were all stupid, ignorant, gullible or some combination thereof if they believed you. I'm not, and you didn't get 62.3 mpg at 90mph and probably not at all.

    So, I don't care that you don't care because your post is in a relatively public part of these forums, and I'm a member. Thus, I get to post a counterpoint to statements that I feel are bullshit. In your own words you didn't ask and you don't care if I believe, but regardless of your cares or questions I don't.

    Have a nice day,

    Chris

  4. #204
    The Bandit Wesman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    4,031

    SGM
    1998 Trans Am WS6

    Quote Originally Posted by Zedicous View Post
    I'm not asking you to believe, it is a fact. The car also wasn't stock. The actual number was 62.3 and there were three to witness it also. Another good factor is i had it since new, so it was well taken care of. The car ran very efficient. I havn't driven far enough to know yet but the RSX-S does get 28mpg city driving.
    Here's the problem with your numbers...they are off the wall.

    No Honda Civic, not even a hybrid, gets 62.3MPG. So there is no way that it can even achieve that kind of fuel economy at 55MPH, and it sure as hell isn't happening at 90MPH. Anything over about 80MPH requires close to wide open throttle in a Civic, and with their short gear ratios, you're around 4500RPM, which really sucks down the gas regardless of engine size. And to top it all of, there were 4 people in the car?? I've heard some bullshit before, but thats ridiculous.

    And not only that, but RSX-S's don't get 28MPG city. They get around 20-22MPG. My friend has an 07 Si, same engine, and thats all he gets in his, bone stock. The EPA rates the RSX-S at 23 city, there is no way you're getting 28MPG. Those numbers are optomistic on those cars, so if anything, you should be getting less than 23 anyway.

  5. #205
    Senior Member M-Ten's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    St. Pete, Florida
    Age
    34
    Posts
    2,210

    Silver+Black/Black+Silver
    1999 TA M6/03 GSXR 600

    I don't get it.. I didn't read the 10 pages before, but the prelude lost the first time, second time it didn't even look the the firebird was racing... ???

  6. #206
    Senior Member Getzen_Guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Age
    35
    Posts
    1,530

    Black
    2000 T/A

    Quote Originally Posted by M-Ten View Post
    I don't get it.. I didn't read the 10 pages before, but the prelude lost the first time, second time it didn't even look the the firebird was racing... ???
    well that firebird ran a 12.6 something....

    lol...

    where is john at?

    no need to read those other pages it's just John_Stout and Me arguing like burns and limecat

  7. #207
    Senior Member Sleeper101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Springcity
    Posts
    1,152

    Red
    Vette,240sx,ls1 camaro

    Quote Originally Posted by Wesman View Post
    Here's the problem with your numbers...they are off the wall.

    No Honda Civic, not even a hybrid, gets 62.3MPG. So there is no way that it can even achieve that kind of fuel economy at 55MPH, and it sure as hell isn't happening at 90MPH. Anything over about 80MPH requires close to wide open throttle in a Civic, and with their short gear ratios, you're around 4500RPM, which really sucks down the gas regardless of engine size. And to top it all of, there were 4 people in the car?? I've heard some bullshit before, but thats ridiculous.

    And not only that, but RSX-S's don't get 28MPG city. They get around 20-22MPG. My friend has an 07 Si, same engine, and thats all he gets in his, bone stock. The EPA rates the RSX-S at 23 city, there is no way you're getting 28MPG. Those numbers are optomistic on those cars, so if anything, you should be getting less than 23 anyway.

    and your T/A gets 30 mpg right?

  8. #208
    Senior Member mrr23's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    orlando, fl
    Posts
    7,364

    black
    2014 camaro 2ss/rs

    you have to be kidding me. argueing over gas mileage in the kills section? i should ban all of you......
    Cold Air Intake, Muffler Delete, Vinci High Performance Dual Valve Springs, Hardened Pushrods, Yella Terra 1.85 Rockers, Some Hydropdipped Stuff, Strut Tower Brace, Some SS Badges, boost/vacuum gauge, fuel pressure gauge, some checkered stripes, drilled/slotted rotors, ZL1addons Stealth wickerbill, Ruxifey LED side markers

Page 11 of 11 FirstFirst ... 7891011

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Friends working for friends.... high bids
    By knightryda01 in forum Almost Anything Goes
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 06-15-2014, 07:33 AM
  2. beastly prelude
    By LeadFarmer in forum Kill Stories
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 09-03-2010, 07:51 AM
  3. prelude is gone...
    By John_stout in forum Almost Anything Goes
    Replies: 42
    Last Post: 11-22-2008, 10:11 AM
  4. 2001 Honda Prelude
    By '99 SLP#24 in forum Vehicles For Sale / Trade
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-27-2007, 07:07 PM
  5. Camaro vs prelude
    By metsatvz400 in forum Kill Stories
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 11-22-2006, 12:43 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •