Results 41 to 60 of 124
Thread: trans am vs. any srt models
-
10-26-2009, 11:52 AM #41
-
10-26-2009, 11:55 AM #42
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Location
- Milwaukee
- Posts
- 3,276
Arctic White, red/gray- 1997 Corvette, 92 Typhoon
-
10-26-2009, 11:56 AM #43
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Location
- Milwaukee
- Posts
- 3,276
Arctic White, red/gray- 1997 Corvette, 92 Typhoon
Looky what i found, stock 2010 manual runs a 12.87 @ 109mph with a 2.0 60ft. DA was 986, so that helped lol
I have already seen with my own eyes 111mph trap speed out of a bone stock 2010 manual. But that guy only went a 13.3. And it was high 30s that night.
I have said it before and il lsay it again, give the new camaro drivers time to get used to the car and the IRS and give the engines time to break in and we will see some 12.6-12.8 passes stock down to the tires.
http://www.camaro5.com/?p=1605Last edited by Zinergy; 10-26-2009 at 12:00 PM.
-
10-26-2009, 12:01 PM #44
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Location
- college station, tx
- Posts
- 2,557
sold: 1999 firebird- 1998 Trans Am
not that motor trend is really acurate, but in thier '10-'11 line up, says challenger goes 0-60 in 4.6 while charger goes it in 5.0, (same as what they say a 98 trans am does)even if they arent right all the time, .4 seconds is a good measurable difference.
-
10-26-2009, 12:08 PM #45
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Location
- college station, tx
- Posts
- 2,557
sold: 1999 firebird- 1998 Trans Am
and yes no doubt, nearly any mild cam will put us well in the lead against the two no doubt sir. i just cant afford any of that right now, college sucks.
-
10-26-2009, 12:56 PM #46
-
10-26-2009, 01:04 PM #47
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Location
- Nebraska
- Posts
- 151
Pewter- 2002 Camaro SS
I had a srt-4.. Dyned 270whp with wga, exhaust, and intercooler and would walk my camaro all day long.
Would run high 12s all day long.12.89 108 2.0
331whp 338rwtq
LLk
-
10-26-2009, 01:07 PM #48
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Location
- Milwaukee
- Posts
- 3,276
Arctic White, red/gray- 1997 Corvette, 92 Typhoon
-
10-26-2009, 01:08 PM #49
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Location
- Milwaukee
- Posts
- 3,276
Arctic White, red/gray- 1997 Corvette, 92 Typhoon
-
10-26-2009, 01:09 PM #50
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Location
- Nebraska
- Posts
- 151
Pewter- 2002 Camaro SS
-
10-26-2009, 01:17 PM #51
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Location
- Milwaukee
- Posts
- 3,276
Arctic White, red/gray- 1997 Corvette, 92 Typhoon
-
10-26-2009, 01:19 PM #52
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Location
- Nebraska
- Posts
- 151
Pewter- 2002 Camaro SS
-
10-26-2009, 01:22 PM #53
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Location
- Milwaukee
- Posts
- 3,276
Arctic White, red/gray- 1997 Corvette, 92 Typhoon
-
10-26-2009, 01:26 PM #54
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Location
- Nebraska
- Posts
- 151
Pewter- 2002 Camaro SS
-
10-26-2009, 01:28 PM #55willys srt8Guest
SRT-8 Charger/Challenger/300 all pretty much the same. Dodge claims 4168lbs for the Charger the 300 and the Challenger are only slightly lighter.
the T/C button is not a toggle under the dash it's right above the radio and to disable it completly it needs to remain pressed for 6 sec till it chimes and the display says ESP off. for best acceleration/track results leave it ON
f-body vs SRT-8 close but if i HAD to bet it would be on the SRT-8.
-
10-26-2009, 01:49 PM #56
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Location
- FL
- Posts
- 750
The average trap speed for a stock new Camaro is 108-111mph. That is a bit more than a stock F-body which averages 104-106mph. While they may be running similar 1/4 mile times, the new Camaro is still pulling harder on the top end.
I forget which company, but they threw a pair of drag radials on a new 6M SS, and it went high 12s@110-111mph, and it was pretty achievable between two different cars they had. I've only seen a small handful of factory freaks, or base model (no power anything) Z28s, that have gone 12s stock.
-
10-26-2009, 01:56 PM #57
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Location
- Milwaukee
- Posts
- 3,276
Arctic White, red/gray- 1997 Corvette, 92 Typhoon
This link is a stock camaro down to the stock tires going a high 12. Im willing to bet the average for that car in a year or two will be 12.8-13.3 a couple tenths better than the 4th gen and a great time will be 12.6s. This is why i laugh when everyone on here talks about how they pulled the new SS with there stock 4th gen. Even though it is heavier, its a faster car.
http://www.camaro5.com/?p=1605
-
10-26-2009, 02:01 PM #58
- Join Date
- Aug 2008
- Location
- Orleans, IN
- Posts
- 150
Red- 2002 Camaro SS
I'm sorry but you do need to get over your 350hp pac thing.... a LS1 puts out 350hp(at crank).... no matter if it is in a Vette, F-body or GTO... any LS1 will dyno from 290hp to 315hp(stock)... give or take a few... and as for the op question... well most likely it is a drivers race....
-
10-26-2009, 03:18 PM #59
i hope you're right-- i want the new camaro to be faster but at this point i'm not super impressed with any of the new musclecars. i dont want to buy something that has an edge over my 02 i want something that will kill my 02
i haven't heard of many new camaros actually trapping 111.. 98% of them are in that 108-109 area.
-
10-26-2009, 04:18 PM #60
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
GTO models
By johnfin in forum GTOReplies: 3Last Post: 06-27-2013, 06:20 AM -
Anyone know why they got rid of the EGR on the later models?
By Naaman in forum External EngineReplies: 3Last Post: 11-16-2012, 07:44 PM -
Question: DIC on 2008 Models
By Mr. Hyde in forum CorvetteReplies: 0Last Post: 01-12-2009, 12:32 PM -
Different Models of Firebird's/T/A's
By Method in forum Firebird / WS6Replies: 9Last Post: 11-11-2007, 01:29 PM -
differences in lsx models
By senior gomez in forum Almost Anything GoesReplies: 6Last Post: 07-10-2006, 09:02 PM
Bookmarks