G-TECH Pro SS and RR??

**Blackout99** · 07-17-2008, 02:36 PM

anybody hear anything about these or use either of them before? im thinking about buying one, just wanna kno if they really are accurate in everything they say

Thanks

**Mr. Luos** · 07-17-2008, 02:42 PM

For me, they would be a waste of money.
Want accurate?? Go to the dyno or the track. Costs less than the G-PRO does.

But, in their defense (kinda), I do not know what features they have these days.

**thearborbarber** · 07-17-2008, 05:14 PM

Here is a link from car and driver's website on tests they did on various performance meters.

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...ature/(page)/1

I have a g-tech pro ss. It's a good unit but I would get the RR so I can upload runs to my computer.

When I compare my elapse time and trap speed from the G-tech it is within 10 hp when compared to the last time my car was on a dyno.

Whether they are dead balls accurate has been debated but I firmly believe in their repeatability and that is a good tool for determining whether a change has been beneficial or not. I have kept track of my runs with a G-tech and note changes and the elapse time decreases and trap speed increases with what seems to be the norm for different mods (i.e. headers, lid ect).