The $109,000 2010 Mustang

**02SOMZ** · 02-21-2010, 06:14 PM

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/2010-...item35a7591b85

**c5z28** · 02-21-2010, 06:18 PM

I think I saw a brief clip about it, for those who want from the dealership straight to the track.

**1fastcamarosss11** · 02-21-2010, 08:08 PM

it's like the dodge drag pack they can out with last year. high horsepower low quantity. high price tag.

it would be cool to have it though.

**F-my-body** · 02-23-2010, 11:23 AM

100k for 425horses...uhhh

**Y2KPewterSS** · 02-23-2010, 07:07 PM

Originally Posted by F-my-body

100k for 425horses...uhhh

So you are saying that a car is all about HP and nothing else?

**Knight** · 02-23-2010, 07:25 PM

Originally Posted by Y2KPewterSS

So you are saying that a car is all about HP and nothing else?

There's something else?

**Y2KPewterSS** · 02-23-2010, 07:28 PM

Originally Posted by Knight

There's something else?

I was specifically asking the guy I quoted

**Knight** · 02-23-2010, 07:39 PM

I know. Just being a smartass. Sorry.

**Zinergy** · 02-24-2010, 08:51 AM

Originally Posted by F-my-body

100k for 425horses...uhhh

It is by far underrated, a 5.4liter dual overhead cam engine with a supercharger is easily making that much power. 425hp is about what a stock 03/04 cobra came with when it had the 4.6 dohc s/c.

**F-my-body** · 02-24-2010, 02:22 PM

Originally Posted by Y2KPewterSS

So you are saying that a car is all about HP and nothing else?

no..but if im throwing 100k out..that bitch better have some giddy up

**kevnstac** · 02-24-2010, 04:21 PM

Originally Posted by F-my-body

no..but if im throwing 100k out..that bitch better have some giddy up

Runs a 1/4 mile below 10 seconds. Actually low to mid 9's from factory. I'd say that's pretty much "giddy up".

**Knight** · 02-24-2010, 04:57 PM

If I had an extra $100k I'd sink it into my car, and then it would eat pretty much anything. Too much $$ to spend on a car.

**Revolutions** · 03-03-2010, 07:12 PM

Mid to upper 9s my arse given a weight of 3200 it takes roughly 700HP to run a 9.75 and it is quite a bit short of the 700HP mark.

**Zinergy** · 03-04-2010, 09:24 AM

Originally Posted by Revolutions

Mid to upper 9s my arse given a weight of 3200 it takes roughly 700HP to run a 9.75 and it is quite a bit short of the 700HP mark.

Its very underrated, this car has already ran those times so its proven to be that fast. Ford charged 75-80k for this car not 109k like this guy is.

Its a modded gt500 engine, those come with 500hpstock so the 425hp rating is way off

**shady milkman** · 03-04-2010, 09:37 AM

Originally Posted by Zinergy

Its very underrated, this car has already ran those times so its proven to be that fast. Ford charged 75-80k for this car not 109k like this guy is.

Its a modded gt500 engine, those come with 500hpstock so the 425hp rating is way off

thank you..i love how people get sooo caught up in posted hp numbers...it wouldnt be the first time the big three have lied about their numbers

**Johns00Z28** · 03-04-2010, 03:33 PM

Wow, $109k for a 9 sec car? I'd think you could build a 7 or 6 sec car for that price.

**VonDutch** · 03-04-2010, 03:46 PM

I'd love to see that car run mid 9's

I bet it don't

None the less it's one nice American Car

Von

**Zinergy** · 03-05-2010, 08:00 AM

Originally Posted by Johns00Z28

Wow, $109k for a 9 sec car? I'd think you could build a 7 or 6 sec car for that price.

Fords msrp was 69,900. But really out the door they were 75-80k. Only time will tell if it can runs 9s. But a modded gt500 engine should be good for 600-1000hp depending on what they did to it and at 3200lbs setup to hook 9s arent out of the question. Remember there are cam and head f-bodys running 10s and some in the 9s with only 450-500whp.

**turbojimmy** · 03-05-2010, 09:42 AM

It's only a $109k Mustang if someone's willing to pay $109k for it. No one was. Bidding ended at $80k, but the reserve was higher than that. Guess the guy has to let it age a little more....