Results 1 to 14 of 14
Thread: lowering springs
-
01-16-2007, 01:56 PM #1
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Location
- florida
- Posts
- 16
blue- 2000 trans am ws6
lowering springs
Anyone tried the vogtland springs ? If so how are they? Does anyone know how they compare to the pro kits?
-
01-16-2007, 03:44 PM #2
- Join Date
- Jun 2002
- Location
- Montreal, CANADA
- Age
- 49
- Posts
- 3,190
triple-black- 2000 CamaroSS convertible
what is the spring rate ? are they progressive, linear ?
behaviour will be dictated by those specs.Eugenio_SS
almost stock triple-black 2000 SS convertible with 17x11s on all 4 w/ 315s at the track or on the street with 18x10.5s on all 4 w/ 315s: (1), (2)
-
01-17-2007, 12:47 AM #3
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Location
- florida
- Posts
- 16
blue- 2000 trans am ws6
It did not say if they are progressive or linear. The only specs listed were :
spring pounds per inch front:336-542 lbs/inch
rear:77-228 lbs/inch
working rate front:440-542 lbs/inch
rear:183-228 lbs/inch
I dont know anything about these figures I just want the car to look good and have a good ride. It also said that they lower the car 1.2 inches front and back.
thanks.
-
01-17-2007, 07:39 AM #4
- Join Date
- Jun 2002
- Location
- Montreal, CANADA
- Age
- 49
- Posts
- 3,190
triple-black- 2000 CamaroSS convertible
that actually says everything.
that means that the springs are progressive... otherwise the rate would not change with the difference compression position on the spring.
the working rate is based with the vehicule weight @ rest to full compression.
These springs are gonna make the rear too stiff and make the car very tail happy.
with a spring rate ~ 500 in the front, i wouldn't go anything much higher than 150 in the rear.
Basically, you'll be constantly losing traction on the rear of the car.
If anything, i'd go w/ the Strano springs, which are around 550front and 150rear (don't quote me on those #s... basing on memory only)
Then you have to look @ shocks to suit the spring rates.
-
01-17-2007, 10:34 AM #5
- Join Date
- Nov 2006
- Location
- Earth
- Posts
- 215
-
01-18-2007, 05:19 AM #6
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Location
- florida
- Posts
- 16
blue- 2000 trans am ws6
thanks very much for the info and taking the time to respond.
-
01-18-2007, 06:20 AM #7
These are a handling spring and will stiffen the ride up on your car. In terms on the rear rate; they are designed to help the car rotate so you do not have to run those enormous anti-roll bars other companies encourage you to run. If you take for example a typical aftermarket anti-roll bar and a 150lb spring your wheel rate be higher than a stock rear sway bar and the Vogtland spring rear wheel rate. We do not like using the bigger anti-roll bars because in the rear they tend to lift the inside tire during cornering which will hurt your total grip and really make your corner exit speeds suffer.
-
01-18-2007, 06:34 AM #8
- Join Date
- Jun 2002
- Location
- Montreal, CANADA
- Age
- 49
- Posts
- 3,190
triple-black- 2000 CamaroSS convertible
but those spring rates for the back are too high, even if having the 19mm rear swaybar... you'll simply lose rear traction too easily unless you increase both the spring rate in the front and put a HUGE front sway-bar to compensate. I figure you would need at least another 100lbs/in in the front and at least a 35/36mm front swaybar... for the car to behave better and not just lose rear traction on corners.
-
01-18-2007, 07:49 PM #9
These springs are designed to allow for you to rotate the car during cornering without the need of the bigger rear bar. If you want to reduce body roll you can do that with either stiffer springs or larger anti-roll bars. The problem with using a larger anti-roll bar in the rear is cornering ability and corner exit acceleration can suffer from unloading of the inside rear tire. If you increase the wheel rate by using springs and not the anit-roll bar you do not have the problem of pulling the inside rear tire during cornering. Everybody has a different feeling of what the car is doing since everybodies driving styles are different so it will be personal preference on how much wheel rate you want. Good luck on your decision. I will tell you if you just want to lower the car for looks and retain a factory quality ride these are not the springs for you. These are a performance spring designed for handling.
-
01-18-2007, 08:28 PM #10
Off topic..but in Karting ..this...
because in the rear they tend to lift the inside tire during cornering which will hurt your total grip
-
01-19-2007, 11:18 AM #11
-
01-22-2007, 08:25 AM #12
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- Hamburg, Germany
- Posts
- 2,521
Silver- 1998 Camaro Z28 A4
Could I run the Vogtland springs with any shocks (KYB gas-a-just for example)? Or would I need something adjustable?
Which shocks are recommendable anyway for a mostly stock daily driver?
-
01-22-2007, 10:57 AM #13
- Join Date
- Nov 2006
- Location
- Earth
- Posts
- 215
If you don't mind me throwing in my 2ยข, I just replaced the deCarbon shocks with Gabriels inside the Vogtland springs. I can understand me getting booed out of the place but they are better than what they replaced and I'm a straight line driver. I spent so little on the struts that the whole effort of lowering my car cost way less than $300 US. The car hugs the road in a turn and I'm pleased with it all.
-
01-22-2007, 11:18 AM #14
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- Hamburg, Germany
- Posts
- 2,521
Silver- 1998 Camaro Z28 A4
sounds tempting...
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Wanted: Wtb lowering springs
By 98maro in forum Parts Wanted / TradeReplies: 35Last Post: 02-08-2011, 09:42 AM -
B and G lowering springs
By Mr.Lee in forum Suspension and HandlingReplies: 0Last Post: 10-22-2009, 09:02 AM -
Lowering Springs
By Vertiviper in forum Firebird / WS6Replies: 6Last Post: 03-22-2006, 03:38 PM
Bookmarks