Results 1 to 4 of 4

Benfits of adjustable Tq Arm vs. fixed?

This is a discussion on Benfits of adjustable Tq Arm vs. fixed? within the Suspension and Handling forums, part of the General Help category; other than price?...

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Boca Raton

    98 SS

    Benfits of adjustable Tq Arm vs. fixed?

    other than price?

  2. #2
    Paid 2 Post Daycrew SexOnWheels's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005

    Blood Red

    Every car is different and that means a set arm could be the wrong angle so therefore why not pay the little extra money to be able to adjust the pinion angle? Also if you change your suspension geometry (e.g. lowering springs) you will have to adjust the pinion angle then as well.

    I Use -2 for drag racing but I like -1 for rr/autoX/street driving so I do adjust mine from under the car

  3. #3
    Crazy Canuck ! Eugenio_SS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Montreal, CANADA

    2000 CamaroSS convertible

    adj. allows to set the pinion angle.
    other things to consider is that some tq-arm have different lengths, some connected to the tranny, some to the chassis. the ones connected to the chassis are shorter in length.
    Note that a shorter tq-arm is good for acceleration (drag)
    Note that a longer tq-arm is good for braking... having a short tq-arm in braking is less efficient, and will bring massive wheel-hop on braking... worse than the wheel-hop you might experience on acceleration, since the the weight is transfered to the front and yo ualso allow for more suspension travel while like that.
    Both are great, but have their advantage/inconvenience... personally, i wouldn't go for a short tq-arm due to compromising braking performance... i'm not that much into drag-racing.
    Note that you can also have the best of both worlds, if you are willing to pay:
    Great proven setup... will act as a short TA when accelerating, and as a very long TA when braking.
    almost stock triple-black 2000 SS convertible with 17x11s on all 4 w/ 315s at the track or on the street with 18x10.5s on all 4 w/ 315s: (1), (2)

  4. #4
    Member z28misfit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006

    1999 Chevy Camaro Z28

    The thing that's nice I think is that if you go with a Torque Arm that's shorter,it takes the stress off the back of the tranny. I just did my sfc' and adj t/a so I'll have too see if I take notice of any problems with braking. Mines located on the crossmember section of my sfc's. They're made by S&W racing.
    99 z28 cam,m6 ,S60 4.56gears,Fast 90/90 full boltons,more mods one day.
    11.2 @ 123mph.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Adjustable or Non-Adjustable Torque Arm?
    By Naaman in forum Suspension and Handling
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 09-18-2016, 10:03 AM
  2. Adjustable or non adjustable LCAs?
    By Spikito in forum Suspension and Handling
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 08-21-2011, 08:43 AM
  3. Panhard Rod Adjustable vs. Non-Adjustable
    By seppburgh in forum Suspension and Handling
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 09-22-2008, 04:18 PM
  4. Borla adjustable or non adjustable?
    By Ryanater in forum External Engine
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 09-14-2007, 07:15 AM
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-12-2007, 05:54 PM


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts