Results 1 to 20 of 28
Thread: 2 or 3 point sub frames??
-
03-02-2008, 05:15 PM #1
2 or 3 point sub frames??
I have a 02 trans am and i was looking to put on some sub frames. My engine is pretty much stock so im sure its not pushin much more with a few mods that i have. I dont think ill be gettin any super chargers or nitrus . Should i get the 2 point sub frame or go from the 3 pointer? i think the 3 might be overkill but i really dont know thats why i need your help!!!
Thanks,
Tony
-
03-02-2008, 05:25 PM #2
I'm not sure I have UMI 3 points and I wouldn't trade them. I plan on going as far as virtually possible though as far as streetable horsepower. If you aren't going to do much to yours I guess you will be fine. I would definitely get something though, you won't regret it I promise you.
UMI sfc,whisper lid,k-n,diablo,shift kit,kooks long tubes-N-y-pipe,Borla 3" cat-back,power bond underdrive pulley,msd wires,front- baer gt brakes, slotted and drilled rotors , braided lines,tuned and dyno'd.345 HP and 354 torque
-
03-02-2008, 05:26 PM #3
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- hixson tennessee
- Age
- 33
- Posts
- 1,641
white- 94 camaro z28
I say 3 point anyways just because your motor from the factory makes alot of power
-
03-02-2008, 05:40 PM #4
Go 3pt... If you go with the extreme duty torque arm in the future, it will bolt right up to the 3rd inner points of the sub frame connectors !!! Giving the car more lift on launches !!!
-
03-02-2008, 06:36 PM #5
3, no doubt
-
03-06-2008, 06:00 AM #6
- Join Date
- Dec 2005
- Location
- Cedar Rpaids,IA
- Age
- 44
- Posts
- 354
Red- 1998 Camaro SS
2pt are okay, but 3pts are better. I personally would only install 3 pts, due to they give support for front to back and side to side loads. Where 2 pts really just give front to back support.
1998 Camaro SS Hard Coupe Bright Red #1593
Mods: Lots!!, still my daily driver except for winter
383rwhp 370rwft/lbs
1979 Corvette
Mods Lots!!, weekend cruiser
325rwhp and 320rwft/lbs
2007 Dodge Ram 1500 4x4 (Yes its got a HEMI)
Mods: Catback, BFI CAI, Winter daily driver
-
03-11-2008, 04:25 PM #7
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Location
- Eastern, Kentucky
- Age
- 37
- Posts
- 494
Black on Black- 2000 Trans Am M6
3pt FTW
SLP LT's, SLP High Flow Cats, 3" Flowmaster CB, Comp Cam, SLP Lid, LS6 Intake, BBK 80mm TB, SFC, Ram Air HO Hood, Lowered, Torq Thrust II's
-
03-12-2008, 03:26 AM #8
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Location
- West Virginia
- Age
- 44
- Posts
- 763
Pewter- Y2K WS6
I have decided to go with 3 point bolt in's ( i can always have welded later) and also because the toque arm will bolt up when i'm done. and i want to make a totally bad assed car so why not be able to handle like one too!
-
03-12-2008, 03:39 AM #9
I think the weld in and bolt in are the same... The bolt in comes with the bolts ! I bought the weld in, and it had all the bolt holes. You made a smart choice !!!
-
03-12-2008, 04:03 AM #10
-
03-13-2008, 07:27 AM #11
bills98ta,
What torque arm set up will bolt to a 3 point sfc? I just ordered 2 point sfc. I will be going with an extreme duty torque arm soon with the 9" install...might have to go with the 3 point for rigidity.
-
03-13-2008, 01:28 PM #12
-
03-13-2008, 01:33 PM #13
is there any brand that u guys recommend
-
03-13-2008, 02:07 PM #14
I used the spohn... Here's an EBay link with nice pics, but you can find a better price on it...
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/93-02...QQcmdZViewItem
-
03-14-2008, 04:17 AM #15
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Location
- West Virginia
- Age
- 44
- Posts
- 763
Pewter- Y2K WS6
I can't speak from personal esperience. but having looked at pictures and other threads here
UMI ROCKS! very good stuff. They make a 3 point SFC and a torque arm relocation bracket that has a drive shaft loop in it. They both bolt up to the same holes. I've thought about this but will have to wait until i have more money.
Steve
-
03-14-2008, 01:52 PM #16
ok thanks those do look good hows the clearance with those brands
-
03-15-2008, 04:26 AM #17
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Location
- Fort Wayne, IN
- Posts
- 59
Red- 2002 Chevy Camaro SS LE
UMI 3 pt. SFC's
I just bought a set of UMI 3 pt. SFC's and will be installing this weekend. They are an awesome looking piece, nice welds and good pwder coating. It will almost be a shame to put them under the car. I bought bolt in one's and may get them welded in later. My reason for not welding in right away is just for flexibility if I decide to sell my 02 SS LE, someone may want a more "stock" car. I spoke to the UMI people a few times and they were very helpful over the phone. UMI did not try and sell my something I did not need. I told them I had a few questions and they immediately asked what my plans were for the car. I also recently bought an adjustable panhard bar from UMI and I am very happy with that also.
My $ 0.02 worth is go with UMI 3 pt. SFC's. I will post an update on how the install goes.
Take Care.
-
03-15-2008, 05:57 AM #18
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Location
- West Virginia
- Age
- 44
- Posts
- 763
Pewter- Y2K WS6
Nice, Price?.. i don't think i found a website for UMI directly..
Can't wait to get my T/A on the road
-
03-15-2008, 11:40 AM #19
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Location
- Fort Wayne, IN
- Posts
- 59
Red- 2002 Chevy Camaro SS LE
UMI 3 pt. SFC's
You can buy them directly from UMI: http://www.umiperformance.com/produc...ategory_id=129
Or: Stranoparts.com
Or you can give Young a call at BYUNSPEED.COM. I got the lowest price from him, but not by a huge amount. You can PM me for details.
I just finished installing my UMI 3-pt SFC's and they are AWESOME. They tuck up against the body so nice that you can not see them unless you crouch down to look under the car. Two people are definitely needed for the install as they are heavy and some physical force may be required. My biggest problem was with using a BMR driveshaft safety loop with the UMI 3-pt. SFC's. Both pieces bolt up in the same location at the center of the car. We took our time and got everything to bolt up. It was tight but we did not have to break out the dremel. I have not driven the car since installing, but the setup looks awesome and looks like it will really tie the car together. UMI's website has some nice pictures of them installed on a car. The UMI 3-pt. SFC's are expensive, but well worth every penny (IMO) and they are cheaper than SLP or Hotchkis SFC's and I believe fit tighter against the body than any other 3-pt. on the market. Again, just my opinion and just like noses, every has one.
If you only are concerned about going in a straight line (drag strip) then I would recommend UMI 2-pt. SFC's, but if you want to do some SCCA or like taking off ramps at double the posted speed limit, then the 3-pt.'s are the way to go. Take Care.
-
03-22-2008, 07:29 AM #20
I was looking at some SFC`s myself I was looking at SLP one`s but it seems everyone on the site has UMI`s . Now UMI`s are cheeper ( non-moly ) are they lighter & better than SLP`s ?
1999 T/A FIREHAWK - SLP Lid & Bellow,LT`s & Catted Y & Power-Flo Catback , MSD & NGK , UMI 3P SFC,ADJ PHB,STB,LCA`s & Relos , Eibach Pro Kit , Bilstine/SLP Shocks , MAC Diff Cover , BFG & OE Wheels C5DD 18x9.5/10.5 , HID 8000K Headlights - Dyno`d @ 319.07 HP & 327.23 Ft-lb ( Tuned by Champ Motors )
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Question: Aluminum frames?
By TOPORANGER in forum CorvetteReplies: 1Last Post: 03-06-2009, 04:03 PM -
Sub Frames
By driftpin in forum Suspension and HandlingReplies: 8Last Post: 02-14-2009, 05:44 PM -
Subframe Connectors - 2 Point vs. 3 Point...Advantage/Disadvantage
By midi_2001 in forum Suspension and HandlingReplies: 10Last Post: 12-06-2007, 11:24 AM -
convertible sub frames??
By speedydog in forum Suspension and HandlingReplies: 9Last Post: 06-21-2007, 04:46 PM -
Sub Frames and Panhard Bar
By ss~zoso~ss in forum Camaro / SSReplies: 7Last Post: 01-07-2006, 03:59 PM
Bookmarks