Hp Diff. between Pacesetter LT and Hooker LT ?

**98Z28importslayer** · 04-27-2008, 10:02 PM

what do you guys think the hp diffrence between Pacesetter non coated full length headers and Hooker super comp. non coated LTs ? it would be on a 98 z28 (ls1) a4 with true dual set up with no cats.

**Midnight02** · 04-28-2008, 05:34 AM

The difference between the two would likely be minimal. I would be surprised if there is any difference greater than +/- 3 rwhp.

**GULLETT17** · 04-28-2008, 05:59 AM

Originally Posted by Midnight02

The difference between the two would likely be minimal. I would be surprised if there is any difference greater than +/- 3 rwhp.

**UTVols98** · 04-28-2008, 08:12 AM

Originally Posted by 98Z28importslayer

what do you guys think the hp diffrence between Pacesetter non coated full length headers and Hooker super comp. non coated LTs ? it would be on a 98 z28 (ls1) a4 with true dual set up with no cats.

Agreed with the minimal difference. I wouldn't worry with the Hooker Sup. Comps unless you are planning some heavy mods later on. Pacesetter will do just fine.

**INMY01TA** · 04-28-2008, 06:00 PM

none.

**Y2KPewterSS** · 04-28-2008, 07:08 PM

None

**Loudz28** · 04-28-2008, 08:17 PM

Originally Posted by Y2KPewterSS

None

**Z28LS1** · 04-29-2008, 02:10 PM

All i know is that the GM performance shops around me say Kooks give the most power out of all of them (but beware of the pricetag). They also told me not to get SLP. One guy said he dynoed 22 more hp from the kooks over slp long tubes. I dont know if i believe him.. but sounds bad. Just get headers that are designed like kooks if money is an issue